JB/116/043/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/116/043/001: Difference between revisions

Jancopes (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Jancopes (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


16 Nov 1802                            88<lb/><lb/><head>Letter 3</head><lb/>The estimate of the pernicious effects of capital punishment would<lb/>
16 Nov 1802                            88<lb/><lb/><head>Letter 3</head><lb/>The estimate of the pernicious effects of capital punishment would<lb/>be <sic>incompleat</sic> indeed if it were supposed to be <gap/><lb/>to that <add>the particular cases in</add> part of the legal code to which that punishment<lb/>is annexed <add>employed</add>.To this <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> to all other causes<lb/>put together &#x2014; to the <add>silent and</add> <gap/> <gap/> of this<lb/>punishment upon <gap/> <gap/> that we are indebted<lb/>for all their <gap/> but <gap/> and vulgar <gap/> and<lb/>maxims and propensities <add>on the part of one <gap/> of our jurisprudence</add> by which the certainty of punish-<lb/>-ment has been enfeebled <add>weakened</add> on the side of <gap/>, and its<lb/>influence on the <add>guilty minds</add> minds of delinquents <del>rendered</del> paralyzed<lb/>and rendered inefficient: <add>1 <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> why so many</add> all their rules of <gap/> which<lb/>were but <gap/> for avoiding to find this <gap/> when from <add>the</add><lb/>execution of the law upon <gap/> is the <gap/> it leads to?<lb/><gap/> is to be the consequence of it - all those <gap/><lb/>of <gap/> by which the guilty are let free which <gap/><lb/>do many <gap/> of triumph to the guilty and <add><gap/></add> <gap/><lb/><add>and forth <gap/> <gap/> any</add> to the innocent and the injured. [+A <gap/> <gap/> it is<lb/>+2. Ask why i is the<lb/>not <gap/> and <gap/><lb/>only the propensity but<lb/>the <gap/>





Revision as of 21:45, 4 June 2013

Click Here To Edit

16 Nov 1802 88

Letter 3
The estimate of the pernicious effects of capital punishment would
be incompleat indeed if it were supposed to be
to that the particular cases in part of the legal code to which that punishment
is annexed employed.To this to all other causes
put together — to the silent and of this
punishment upon that we are indebted
for all their but and vulgar and
maxims and propensities on the part of one of our jurisprudence by which the certainty of punish-
-ment has been enfeebled weakened on the side of , and its
influence on the guilty minds minds of delinquents rendered paralyzed
and rendered inefficient: 1 why so many all their rules of which
were but for avoiding to find this when from the
execution of the law upon is the it leads to?
is to be the consequence of it - all those
of by which the guilty are let free which
do many of triumph to the guilty and
and forth any to the innocent and the injured. [+A it is
+2. Ask why i is the
not and
only the propensity but
the




Identifier: | JB/116/043/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 116.

Date_1

1802-11-16

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

116

Main Headings

panopticon versus new south wales

Folio number

043

Info in main headings field

letter 3d

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d1 / f88

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

1800

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1800

Notes public

ID Number

37576

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in