JB/041/445/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/041/445/001: Difference between revisions

Robmagin (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Robmagin (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:


<head>1831 Sept 19</head>
<head>1831 Sept 19</head>
<head><p>Const. Code.</p></head>
<head>Const. Code.</head>


<head>17</head>
<head>17</head>
<p>2. Cause in Case 2- Le-<lb/>gislative perspicuity.<lb/> By Substantive law<lb/> an act being prohibited,<lb/> by Adjective prosecution<lb/> is interdicted to all but<lb/> the Government Advocate,<lb/> subject in a Monarchy<lb/> to the Monarch, in <hi rend='underline'>this</hi><lb/> Constitution, to Prime<lb/> Minister.</p><lb/><p>Cause here, regard<lb/> for people's amity, as above.</p>
<p>2. Cause in Case 2- Le-<lb/>gislative perspicuity.<lb/> By Substantive law<lb/> an act being prohibited,<lb/> by Adjective prosecution<lb/> is interdicted to all but<lb/> the Government Advocate,<lb/> subject in a Monarchy<lb/> to the Monarch, in <hi rend='underline'>this</hi><lb/> Constitution, to Prime<lb/> Minister.</p><p>Cause here, regard<lb/> for people's amity, as above.</p>
<head>18.</head>
<head>18.</head>
Hence,  
Hence, supposing great-<lb/> set happiness the end,<lb/> Legislator's opinion is<lb/> that by attaching pun-<lb/>ishment to the acts in ques-<lb/>tion: happiness would be<lb/> diminished: yet by be-<lb/> ing seen to take it off,<lb/> ill-will would be pro-<lb/>duced involving an<lb/> evil which by an un-<lb/> observed course might<lb/> be excluded.
<head>19</head>
Here the supposition<lb/> is that by punishment<lb/> attached to the acts in question,<lb/> happiness<lb/> would be diminished.<lb/> Yet in the promulga-<lb/>tion of a new Code<lb/> were no punishment<lb/> attached to them, dis-<lb/>satisfaction would be<lb/> produced, pregnant<lb/> with more evil than<lb/> will be produced by<lb/> the punishment, added<lb/> to the consequent re-<lb/>straint.
<pb/>
<head>20</head>
What then to do here?<lb/> Answer- Apply to the<lb/> obnoxious act the least<lb/> punishment the people<lb/> will to see; but<lb/> appoint for sole pro-<lb/>secutor the Government<lb/> Advocate General.
<head>21</head>
To evils supposed to<lb/> flow from expres-<lb/>sion given to bad<lb/> opinions punish-<lb/>ment has by almost<lb/> all legislators been<lb/> attached. To inquire<lb/> into the reaction<lb/> between this alleged<lb/> cause and the hap-<lb/>piness of the commu-<lb/>nity belongs not to<lb/> this purpose. Only<lb/> for aid to conception<lb/> is it held up to view.
<head>22.</head>
To this purpose belongs<lb/> the observation that<lb/> supposing this policy<lb/> advisable, the Govern-<lb/>meant Advocate<lb/> under Prime Ministers'<lb/> orders is the function-<lb/>ary for carrying it<lb/> into effect.
<head>22(a)</head>
Other
 
 
 
 
 
 
 




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 05:27, 13 June 2013

'Click Here To Edit

1831 Sept 19 Const. Code.

17

2. Cause in Case 2- Le-
gislative perspicuity.
By Substantive law
an act being prohibited,
by Adjective prosecution
is interdicted to all but
the Government Advocate,
subject in a Monarchy
to the Monarch, in this
Constitution, to Prime
Minister.

Cause here, regard
for people's amity, as above.

18. Hence, supposing great-
set happiness the end,
Legislator's opinion is
that by attaching pun-
ishment to the acts in ques-
tion: happiness would be
diminished: yet by be-
ing seen to take it off,
ill-will would be pro-
duced involving an
evil which by an un-
observed course might
be excluded. 19 Here the supposition
is that by punishment
attached to the acts in question,
happiness
would be diminished.
Yet in the promulga-
tion of a new Code
were no punishment
attached to them, dis-
satisfaction would be
produced, pregnant
with more evil than
will be produced by
the punishment, added
to the consequent re-
straint.
---page break---
20 What then to do here?
Answer- Apply to the
obnoxious act the least
punishment the people
will to see; but
appoint for sole pro-
secutor the Government
Advocate General. 21 To evils supposed to
flow from expres-
sion given to bad
opinions punish-
ment has by almost
all legislators been
attached. To inquire
into the reaction
between this alleged
cause and the hap-
piness of the commu-
nity belongs not to
this purpose. Only
for aid to conception
is it held up to view. 22. To this purpose belongs
the observation that
supposing this policy
advisable, the Govern-
meant Advocate
under Prime Ministers'
orders is the function-
ary for carrying it
into effect. 22(a) Other







Identifier: | JB/041/445/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 41.

Date_1

1831-09-19

Marginal Summary Numbering

17-22, 22a, 23-24

Box

041

Main Headings

Constitutional Code

Folio number

445

Info in main headings field

Const. Code

Image

001

Titles

Category

Marginal summary sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property.

Page Numbering

E3

Penner

Watermarks

J WHATMAN TURKEY MILL 1829

Marginals

Paper Producer

Jonathan Blenman

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1829

Notes public

ID Number

001

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in