★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
of the Public Opinion Tribunal.<lb/></p> | of the Public Opinion Tribunal.<lb/></p> | ||
<p>4. Ordaining the registration of the discourses of the Quasi<lb/> | |||
Jurymen as well as those of the Judge is for the purpose of subjecting<lb/> | |||
<del>these</del> to responsibility <add>these <gap/> to the Judge</add> in case of una<gap/> discourse <del><gap/></del> on this<lb/> | |||
past: and the Judge himself in case of disregard shown to <lb/> | |||
this discourse when its loth to regard shall appear unimpeachable.<lb/></p> | |||
5. Admission <add>In<add>to</add> the <add> requests</add>secured, to any alterations<add>amendment</add> proposed by the<lb/> | |||
Quasi Jury or any member of it to the terms of the decision<lb/> | |||
<del><gap/><gap/></del> <unclear>debarred</unclear> by the Judge: yet to us the Judge shall <unclear>remain</unclear><lb/> | |||
at liberty to pay what regard to it he thinks proper: remaining thus<lb/> | |||
with his responsibility undiminished: the amendment <del>being rif</del> | |||
<add>going after</add> of <note>common to the Judge Appelation for his adoption rejection, or modification.</note> | |||
1823. August Sept.3
Constitutional Code
IV. Features, supposed apt, which not being found in the Jury
System are here, in the Quasi-Jury systems introduced.
So far as they have correspondent and opposite features in
the Quasi Jury system then have
been already mentioned
1. Division of the every Quasi Jury into two sections: 1 the
more erudite: 2. the more popular: the more erudite: the more
popular the more numerous, than in case of disagreement the
work of thethose who belong to more numerous section may preponderate over the
will of the less those who belong to the most less numerous
section. the more those who belong toerudite section introduced that by the
influence of stronger understanding over understanding, then
who may be supposedpositive to result in inaffectual aptitude.
in whose intellectual aptitude may be refracted very guide
than who in whom appropriate moral aptitude
is more probable, in so far as they think asproper to
be so guided
2 AllowingAllotting to the JuryQuasi Jury by law in express terms,
and thence withmore comparativeness and more constant -surer effect the several functions herein
designated by the a several adjuncts auditors, inbtive,
and consonant, and with more composition effect than has
place in the case of athe Jury.
3. Stating in express terms the notion of the explanations
expected at the hands of the Judge for the use of the
Quasi Jury as also for the use of theothers herein-after members
of the Public Opinion Tribunal.
4. Ordaining the registration of the discourses of the Quasi
Jurymen as well as those of the Judge is for the purpose of subjecting
these to responsibility these to the Judge in case of una discourse on this
past: and the Judge himself in case of disregard shown to
this discourse when its loth to regard shall appear unimpeachable.
5. Admission In<add>to the requestssecured, to any alterationsamendment proposed by the
Quasi Jury or any member of it to the terms of the decision
debarred by the Judge: yet to us the Judge shall remain
at liberty to pay what regard to it he thinks proper: remaining thus
with his responsibility undiminished: the amendment being rif
going after of common to the Judge Appelation for his adoption rejection, or modification.
Identifier: | JB/041/111/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 41. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1823-09-03 |
27-32 |
||
041 |
Constitutional Code |
||
111 |
Constitutional Code |
||
001 |
|||
Text sheet |
1 |
||
Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property. |
D9 / E1 |
||
J WHATMAN TURKEY MILL 1822 |
|||
Jonathan Blenman |
|||
1822 |
|||
001 |
|||