JB/097/209/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/097/209/002: Difference between revisions

Robmagin (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Robmagin (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 9: Line 9:
<p>2.<lb/> Evil consciousness<lb/>on the part of a De<lb/>fendant.</p>
<p>2.<lb/> Evil consciousness<lb/>on the part of a De<lb/>fendant.</p>
<p>3.<lb/> Temerity on the part<lb/>of a pursuer or other<lb/>applicant: thereby,<lb/> wasteful consump<lb/>tion of Judicial time.</p>
<p>3.<lb/> Temerity on the part<lb/>of a pursuer or other<lb/>applicant: thereby,<lb/> wasteful consump<lb/>tion of Judicial time.</p>
<p>4.<lb/> Mendacious falsehood<lb/>on the part of Pursuer<lb/> Defendant<lb/> or Witness:<lb/>fine applicable the<lb/>instant the deliquen<lb/>--cy is sufficient as<lb/>-certained.</p>
<p>4.<lb/> Mendacious falsehood<lb/>on the part of Pursuer<lb/> Defendant or Witness:<lb/>fine applicable the<lb/>instant the deliquen<lb/>--cy is sufficient as<lb/>-certained.</p>
<p>5.<lb/> <unclear>Temeraciens</unclear> fals<lb/>hood on the part of<lb/> the above. </p>
<p>5.<lb/> <unclear>Temeraciens</unclear> fals<lb/>hood on the part of<lb/> the above. </p>
<p>6.<lb/> In every case of de<lb/>-linquency, fine in<lb/> execution as the<lb/> whole on a part of<lb/> punishment, in so<lb/> for as the circum<lb/>stances of the de<lb/>-linquent admit.</p>
<p>6.<lb/> In every case of de<lb/>-linquency, fine in<lb/> execution as the<lb/> whole on a part of<lb/> punishment, in so<lb/> for as the circum<lb/>stances of the de<lb/>-linquent admit.</p>
<p>7.<lb/> So, even and above<lb/> satisfaction to the<lb/> pursuer when, for<lb/> the subsequently pre<lb/>ventive purpose of<lb/> punishment, suffer<lb/>-ing is requisite over<lb/> and above that pro<lb/>-duced by the<lb/> burthen<lb/> of adequate satisfac<lb/>tion</p>
<p>7.<lb/> So, even and above<lb/> satisfaction to the<lb/> pursuer when, for<lb/> the subsequently pre<lb/>ventive purpose of<lb/> punishment, suffer<lb/>-ing is requisite over<lb/> and above that pro<lb/>-duced by the burthen<lb/> of adequate satisfac<lb/>tion</p>
<pb/>
<pb/>
Occasions for Fines<lb/>or say Mulets.
Occasions for Fines<lb/>or say Mulets.

Revision as of 04:30, 2 July 2013

Click Here To Edit

1828. Feby 2 Agenda for the Law Amendment Commission Resources as to Expense. Occasions for Fines
or say Mulets.

1.
Evil consciousness
on the part of the
Pursuer or other Ap
-plicant.

2.
Evil consciousness
on the part of a De
fendant.

3.
Temerity on the part
of a pursuer or other
applicant: thereby,
wasteful consump
tion of Judicial time.

4.
Mendacious falsehood
on the part of Pursuer
Defendant or Witness:
fine applicable the
instant the deliquen
--cy is sufficient as
-certained.

5.
Temeraciens fals
hood on the part of
the above.

6.
In every case of de
-linquency, fine in
execution as the
whole on a part of
punishment, in so
for as the circum
stances of the de
-linquent admit.

7.
So, even and above
satisfaction to the
pursuer when, for
the subsequently pre
ventive purpose of
punishment, suffer
-ing is requisite over
and above that pro
-duced by the burthen
of adequate satisfac
tion


---page break---
Occasions for Fines
or say Mulets.

8.
Conspiracy on the
part of numbers for
wasting the time of
the Judicatory, thereby
delaying the commence
-ment or termination
of this or that indivi
-dual suit or class
of suits

9.
Note that, under the
proposed system, fine
for the purpose
of sa
tisfaction to the indivi
-dual takes place by
the whole amount
of it of fine for the pur
-pose of punishment:
because fine to the
party wronged answers
pro tanto, the prevent
-ive purpose of punish
-ment: not vice versa.

10.
Note on the other
hand that, in default
of capital in hand,
fine may be made
payable by instalments
not only out of in
-come in possession,
but out of income
produced by the pro-
-duce of future labors:
and for securing such
instalments, Friendly
Bondsmen may be
called in.


---page break---
Savings

1. Comparative suppress
ion of smuggling by
the superior efficiency
of the proposed system:
abolition of the delin
-quency-protecting rules
of Evidence.





Identifier: | JB/097/209/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 97.

Date_1

1828-02-02

Marginal Summary Numbering

1-3, 1-6, 1-10

Box

097

Main Headings

law amendment

Folio number

209

Info in main headings field

agenda for the law amendment commission

Image

002

Titles

principles as to expense / occasions for fines or say mulcts / ulterior savings

Category

marginal summary sheet

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

j whatman turkey mill 1824

Marginals

Paper Producer

admiral pavel chichagov

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

1824

Notes public

ID Number

31593

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in