JB/002/250/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/002/250/001: Difference between revisions

TB Editor (talk | contribs)
Created page with ''''[{{fullurl:JB/002/250/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> ''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet'' <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELO…'
 
Lea Stern (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>159</head>
 
<p>including so many comparatively petty Towns and<lb/> even Villages &#x2014; even for the period of greatest <lb/> abundance: &#x2014; and yet at a period of inferior<lb/> abundance we find £200,000 the quantity<lb/> spent by a single Town in a town of inferior<lb/> rank &#x2014; Newcastle! How small<lb/> may be the quantity <del>of it</del> in <unclear>office</unclear> in the inclusion <lb/>in which it is <gap/>, it seems impossible to<lb/> say: &#x2014; no <del><gap/></del> <add>more</add> than a few thousands, possibly,<lb/> &#x2014; or even hundreds : &#x2014; &#x2014; in that case a few such <lb/>instances as Newcastle and many there can <lb/>hardly be &#x2014; would go but a small way towards <lb/>
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 22:46, 15 July 2013

Click Here To Edit

159

including so many comparatively petty Towns and
even Villages — even for the period of greatest
abundance: — and yet at a period of inferior
abundance we find £200,000 the quantity
spent by a single Town in a town of inferior
rank — Newcastle! How small
may be the quantity of it in office in the inclusion
in which it is , it seems impossible to
say: — no more than a few thousands, possibly,
— or even hundreds : — — in that case a few such
instances as Newcastle and many there can
hardly be — would go but a small way towards
Metadata:JB/002/250/001

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in