JB/107/215/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/107/215/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
Petergh (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>29 Jan<hi rend="superscript">y</hi> 1809</head>
<head>Peines</head><!-- headings in pencil -->


<p><unclear>Pardon</unclear> should be the <unclear>rare case</unclear>. <unclear>disagree inferred from</unclear> <hi rend="underline">negligence</hi>.<lb/>
<gap/> if laws were made with the new <gap/> though <gap/> <gap/> <unclear>intention</unclear> of<lb/>
<unclear>their being</unclear> <gap/> <unclear>in</unclear> nine instances out of ten.</p>
<note><!-- note in pencil -->Paley 3 Which is different from the power of pardon. the dispensing power as now exercised being the <unclear>rule</unclear> - <del>power</del> pardon only an exception &amp; that for reasons assigned</note>
Not I indeed: <del><gap/></del> <unclear>is my</unclear> conception of the matter<lb/>
between the possession and exercise of a power of <hi rend="underline">pardoning</hi><lb/>
on the one hand, and the exercise of <add>what is so well known under the name of</add> a <hi rend="underline">dispensing</hi> power<lb/>
there exists a perfectly <add>very</add> clear and distinguishable difference.<lb/>
As to the power of pardon, the latitude <add><unclear>field</unclear> of <gap/></add> that according to<lb/>
my conception of the matter ought to be given to it, <add>marked out for it</add><lb/>
as well as by what authority, has already been brought<lb/>
to view.




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 11:25, 21 July 2013

Click Here To Edit

29 Jany 1809 Peines

Pardon should be the rare case. disagree inferred from negligence.
if laws were made with the new though intention of
their being in nine instances out of ten.

Paley 3 Which is different from the power of pardon. the dispensing power as now exercised being the rule - power pardon only an exception & that for reasons assigned Not I indeed: is my conception of the matter
between the possession and exercise of a power of pardoning
on the one hand, and the exercise of what is so well known under the name of a dispensing power
there exists a perfectly very clear and distinguishable difference.
As to the power of pardon, the latitude field of that according to
my conception of the matter ought to be given to it, marked out for it
as well as by what authority, has already been brought
to view.



Identifier: | JB/107/215/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 107.

Date_1

1809-01-29

Marginal Summary Numbering

3

Box

107

Main Headings

law versus arbitrary power (a hatchet for dr paley's net)

Folio number

215

Info in main headings field

peines

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e14

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

pr1

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

35206

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in