★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
Auto upload |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'[{{fullurl:JB/041/122/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | '[{{fullurl:JB/041/122/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head>1824. March 19</head><lb/> | |||
<head>Constitutional Code.</head> <note>Ch. XV. Quasi-Jury</note><lb/> | |||
<note>S.3 Functions.</note> | |||
Art. 13. VII. Appeal-licensing function. The<lb/> | |||
<del><gap/></del> sort of occasion by which thus their function is called<lb/> | |||
into exercise is as follows. <del>In the case between</del> <unclear>Consistent</unclear><lb/> | |||
<del><gap/> are</del><add>cases there appear to be,</add> in which <add><del>of a consequence of</del></add> <del>should Appeal be put without</del> <unclear>retrut<del>ion</del></unclear><lb/> | |||
<del>and the power of the defendent used</del> <add>of</add> the exemption of<lb/> | |||
the sanction were delayed of course, until the decrees of the<lb/> | |||
Appellant Judicatory have been pronounced, and <add><del>its <gap/> sanction</del></add> <del><gap/> <gap/></del><add><del><gap/></del></add><lb/> | |||
of the <del>Law</del><add><gap/> given to the execution of the imperative decree</add> Immediate Judicatory. <del><gap/> method for execution</del> <lb/> the certain evil of delay, vexation and asp<gap/>, to<lb/> | |||
<gap/> improved, and M<gap/> action in the judicial theatre, might<lb/> | |||
in the eyes of the Legislation outweigh the possible evil of effective<lb/> | |||
<unclear>undecision</unclear> for want of such Appeal, if <del>such Appeal</del><lb/> | |||
with consequent <del>delay</del> stay of execution, <add>the Appeal</add> were placed <del>ap</del><lb/> | |||
absolutely within the power of the Defendant. | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} |
'Click Here To Edit
1824. March 19
Constitutional Code. Ch. XV. Quasi-Jury
S.3 Functions.
Art. 13. VII. Appeal-licensing function. The
sort of occasion by which thus their function is called
into exercise is as follows. In the case between Consistent
arecases there appear to be, in which of a consequence of should Appeal be put without retrution
and the power of the defendent used of the exemption of
the sanction were delayed of course, until the decrees of the
Appellant Judicatory have been pronounced, and its sanction
of the Law given to the execution of the imperative decree Immediate Judicatory. method for execution
the certain evil of delay, vexation and asp, to
improved, and M action in the judicial theatre, might
in the eyes of the Legislation outweigh the possible evil of effective
undecision for want of such Appeal, if such Appeal
with consequent delay stay of execution, the Appeal were placed ap
absolutely within the power of the Defendant.
Identifier: | JB/041/122/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 41. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1824-03-19 |
|||
041 |
Constitutional Code |
||
122 |
Constitutional Code |
||
001 |
|||
Text sheet |
1 |
||
Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property. |
D9 / E4 |
||
001 |
|||