JB/107/217/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/107/217/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
Petergh (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>29 Jan<hi rend="superscript">y</hi> 180<del>8</del>9.</head>
<head>Peines <hi rend="superscript">16</hi></head><!-- headings in pencil -->


<p><note>Paley <unclear>number</unclear> 7 <add>Paley</add> Offenders swept into by <hi rend="underline">numerous</hi> Statutes <del>Th</del>Number of Statutes creating capital <del>offences</del> punishment no proof of <sic>compleatness</sic>, since however numerous</note>
By the <hi rend="underline">number</hi> &#x2014; by the <unclear>mere</unclear> <hi rend="underline">number</hi> <add>it is, <unclear>as</unclear></add> without notice<lb/>
taken of <hi rend="underline">extent</hi>, that is here said to do what it is here<lb/>
said to accomplish</p>
Another error - and that too a vulgar one: and<lb/>
not the less so for being a parliamentary one. By the<lb/>
Reverend Doctor at least a professed teacher of logic -<lb/>
had his hope been of a <unclear>complexion</unclear> fit for use this error <add>at least</add><lb/>
might <add>would</add> have been avoided. And needs <add>needed</add> be there to be<lb/>
<unclear>told</unclear> that the number of statutes creating capital offences<lb/>
might have been any number of thousands of times greater<lb/>
than it is, without being half so sanguinary as it is or<lb/>
filling half so full as it has done the delectable <add>delightful <add>convenient</add></add> net<lb/>
he speaks of? Needed he to be told that metal after metal<lb/> and <del><gap/></del> plant after plant have to this purpose<lb/>
by successive statutes been taken for the subject of legislation?<lb/>
and that <hi rend="superscript">[+]</hi>




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 13:19, 22 July 2013

Click Here To Edit

29 Jany 18089. Peines 16

Paley number 7 Paley Offenders swept into by numerous Statutes ThNumber of Statutes creating capital offences punishment no proof of compleatness, since however numerous By the number — by the mere number it is, as without notice
taken of extent, that is here said to do what it is here
said to accomplish

Another error - and that too a vulgar one: and
not the less so for being a parliamentary one. By the
Reverend Doctor at least a professed teacher of logic -
had his hope been of a complexion fit for use this error at least
might would have been avoided. And needs needed be there to be
told that the number of statutes creating capital offences
might have been any number of thousands of times greater
than it is, without being half so sanguinary as it is or
filling half so full as it has done the delectable delightful <add>convenient</add> net
he speaks of? Needed he to be told that metal after metal
and plant after plant have to this purpose
by successive statutes been taken for the subject of legislation?
and that [+]



Identifier: | JB/107/217/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 107.

Date_1

1809-01-29

Marginal Summary Numbering

7

Box

107

Main Headings

law versus arbitrary power (a hatchet for dr paley's net)

Folio number

217

Info in main headings field

peines

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e16

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

th 1806

Marginals

pr1

Paper Producer

andre morellet

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1806

Notes public

ID Number

35208

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in