★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
Created page with ''''[{{fullurl:JB/002/482/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> ''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet'' <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELO…' |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head>Art. 20.</head><lb/>12 Annuity <gap/><lb/><lb/>Altough none of the Stockholders had submitted<lb/><add><gap/></add> a reduction, <add><hi rend="underline">might,</hi></add> in some way or other, <del><gap/></del> at some<lb/>time or other, might and perhaps <hi rend="underline">would</hi> have<lb/><gap/> <gap/>. But in what time? At ten years<lb/><note><hi rend="superscript">+</hi>That is to say, <gap/><lb/>having <hi rend="underline">time</hi> and<lb/><hi rend="underline">persons</hi> favourable: Parlia-<lb/>-ments and their <gap/>-<lb/>-<gap/> Ministers, and<lb/>their Successors, to have<lb/>been consistent for perhaps<lb/>ten years.</note><lb/>end or so, perhaps: [at least <gap/> <gap/> was then<lb/>expected] Two in <gap/> one millions a year perhaps:<lb/><del>and it</del> <gap/> <gap/> <add>for</add> <del><gap/></del> round numbers, 8 millions.<lb/>From <add>the statement above given</add> what has been observed above it is evident<lb/>that <add>taking that same length of time</add> one and the same sum of 6 millions would<lb/>have done all the business: No accumulation would<lb/>have been necessary: no such thing would then have<lb/><add><gap/> at least</add> been reckoned upon: it is only of late years<lb/>that people <del>have</del> have <add>allowed themselves to see</add> <del>learnt to <gap/></del> that<lb/>property does accumulate. Ten vibrations of this<lb/>many <add><gap/></add> would have sufffered: but <del>less</del> at the Par-<lb/>-liamentary rate of <add>going</add> progress less than a year can<lb/><gap/> be allowed for the <gap/> of each vibration.<hi rend="superscript">a</hi><lb/>-----<lb/>Note<lb/><hi rend="superscript">(a)</hi>the plainness of this measure <add>could not have looked</add> did not look to<lb/> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | ||
Art. 20.
12 Annuity
Altough none of the Stockholders had submitted
a reduction, might, in some way or other, at some
time or other, might and perhaps would have
. But in what time? At ten years
+That is to say,
having time and
persons favourable: Parlia-
-ments and their -
- Ministers, and
their Successors, to have
been consistent for perhaps
ten years.
end or so, perhaps: [at least was then
expected] Two in one millions a year perhaps:
and it for round numbers, 8 millions.
From the statement above given what has been observed above it is evident
that taking that same length of time one and the same sum of 6 millions would
have done all the business: No accumulation would
have been necessary: no such thing would then have
at least been reckoned upon: it is only of late years
that people have have allowed themselves to see learnt to that
property does accumulate. Ten vibrations of this
many would have sufffered: but less at the Par-
-liamentary rate of going progress less than a year can
be allowed for the of each vibration.a
-----
Note
(a)the plainness of this measure could not have looked did not look to
