★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 71: | Line 71: | ||
2. what illegal.<lb/> | 2. what illegal.<lb/> | ||
<pb/> | <pb/> | ||
<head>12.</head> | |||
Cases put of illegal<lb/> | |||
regulations for which<lb/> | |||
in point of utility<lb/> | |||
there may be a<lb/> | |||
demand.<lb/> | |||
<lb/> | |||
<head>13.</head> | |||
Capt<hi rend="underline"><hi rend="superscript">n</hi> Collins not<lb/> | |||
considering this<lb/> | |||
want of power to<lb/> | |||
make regulations<lb/> | |||
speaks with surprize<lb/> | |||
of the spirit<lb/> | |||
of careless independance<lb/> | |||
among<lb/> | |||
the emancipated<lb/> | |||
bondsmen.<lb/> | |||
<lb/> | |||
<pb/> | |||
<head>1</head> | |||
<unclear>Thought</unclear> the design was<lb/> | |||
to prevent the return of<lb/> | |||
Convicts, no plan was<lb/> | |||
<del><gap/><gap/><gap/></del> <add><gap/><gap/><gap/></add><lb/> | |||
<del><gap/><gap/><gap/></del> <add><gap/> of it - neither</add><lb/> | |||
<del>of the Convicts</del> <add>at they <gap/>, nor for <gap/>. p,10?</add><lb/> | |||
<head>2</head> | |||
A just one would<lb/> | |||
have provided for<lb/> | |||
their return of emancipees<lb/> | |||
and made it<lb/> | |||
as easy as under<lb/> | |||
the old system. p.19<lb/> | |||
<lb/> | |||
<head><del>2</del> 3.</head> | |||
An unjust one would<lb/> | |||
have taken measures<lb/> | |||
against the return<lb/> | |||
of emancipees from<lb/> | |||
the first.<lb/> | |||
<lb/> | |||
<head><del>3</del> 4</head> | |||
At first they had<lb/> | |||
no plan for prevention<lb/> | |||
of the return either<lb/> | |||
of emancipees or<lb/> | |||
non-emancipees.<lb/> | |||
<lb/> | |||
<head>5.</head> | |||
When they had any<lb/> | |||
it was directed as<lb/> | |||
much against the<lb/> | |||
one as the other.<lb/> | |||
<lb/> | |||
<head>6</head> | |||
and this the legitimate<lb/> | |||
object of the establishment<lb/> | |||
or not their<lb/> | |||
conduct is equally<lb/> | |||
indefensible.<lb/> | |||
<lb/> | |||
<head><del>6</del> 7.</head> | |||
When they put emancipated<lb/> | |||
bondsmen<lb/> | |||
under this<lb/> | |||
illegal restraint<lb/> | |||
they put all freemen<lb/> | |||
under the same<lb/> | |||
restraint.<lb/> | |||
<lb/> | |||
<head><del>7</del> 10</head> | |||
It was with the<lb/> | |||
Penitentiary Act<lb/> | |||
of 1799 before them<lb/> | |||
the Act so anxious<lb/> | |||
to distinguish between<lb/> | |||
degrees of punishment<lb/> | |||
that they thus confound<lb/> | |||
them.<lb/> | |||
<lb/> | |||
<head>8</head> | |||
<gap/> of these <gap/><gap/><gap/><lb/> | |||
plan<lb/> | |||
1. While <add><hi rend="superscript">as yet</hi></add> there was no<lb/> | |||
plan formed for preventing<lb/> | |||
the return of<lb/> | |||
non-expirees, expences<lb/> | |||
were provided, by the<lb/> | |||
neglect, not accidental<lb/> | |||
or <gap/>, <gap/> and <gap/><lb/> | |||
out the process and <gap/><lb/> | |||
<gap/> lengths of the <lb/>. p.25<lb/> | |||
<pb/> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} |
1.
Legislative power. none
created.
2.
Cause. Two powers
were meant to be exercised.
neither of them
fit to be named -
1. Power of reasoning
all the transportation
laws
3.
2. Power of legislation
in a single hand.
4.
Pitt was then upon
his good behaviour
having lately stood
his ground against
the House of Commons
upon Constitutional
grounds -
5
There was a rage
for colonizing somewhere
- this furnished
a pretence for the
expence
6
To create the necessary
legislative power the
only way was to
create the necessity
for it by
7.
As by the first Pitt
Lord Camden had been
done by negligence.
8
Evil consequences
1<hi rend="underline">st</hi> Unconstitutional
example
2. Insecurity of the
Colony.
9.
The seditionists if at
any time they should
have lawyers among
them may subvert
the government without
incurring any
legal penalty.
10
Regulations
1st what legal
11
2. what illegal.
---page break---
12.
Cases put of illegal
regulations for which
in point of utility
there may be a
demand.
13.
Capt<hi rend="superscript">n Collins not
considering this
want of power to
make regulations
speaks with surprize
of the spirit
of careless independance
among
the emancipated
bondsmen.
---page break---
1
Thought the design was
to prevent the return of
Convicts, no plan was
of it - neither
of the Convicts at they , nor for . p,10?
2
A just one would
have provided for
their return of emancipees
and made it
as easy as under
the old system. p.19
2 3.
An unjust one would
have taken measures
against the return
of emancipees from
the first.
3 4
At first they had
no plan for prevention
of the return either
of emancipees or
non-emancipees.
5.
When they had any
it was directed as
much against the
one as the other.
6
and this the legitimate
object of the establishment
or not their
conduct is equally
indefensible.
6 7.
When they put emancipated
bondsmen
under this
illegal restraint
they put all freemen
under the same
restraint.
7 10
It was with the
Penitentiary Act
of 1799 before them
the Act so anxious
to distinguish between
degrees of punishment
that they thus confound
them.
8
of these
plan
1. While as yet there was no
plan formed for preventing
the return of
non-expirees, expences
were provided, by the
neglect, not accidental
or , and
out the process and
lengths of the
. p.25
---page break---
Identifier: | JB/116/451/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 116. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1802-07-01 |
1-10, 1-11 |
||
116 |
panopticon versus new south wales |
||
451 |
new south wales conduct contents |
||
001 |
|||
marginal summary sheet |
2 |
||
recto |
|||
john herbert koe |
cw 1799 |
||
c. abbit lees |
|||
1799 |
|||
37984 |
|||