★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
and writing not of the probability of <unclear>Innesesser</unclear>.<lb/> | and writing not of the probability of <unclear>Innesesser</unclear>.<lb/> | ||
cannot by be true As if W. defenses that he saw <gap/><lb/> | cannot by be true As if W. defenses that he saw <gap/><lb/> | ||
ran through the body by A. alone, I presumably expire.<lb/> | |||
<note>+ or <unclear>Providentially</unclear></note> Proof <hi rend="underline">Violable</hi> <hi rend="superscript">+</hi> <hi rend="underline">Presumptive</hi> is that, which is of itself insufficient <lb/> | |||
to convert, if nothing on the opposite side <unclear>opposes</unclear>, which<lb/> | |||
<note>A- accorded D. deceased W. Writings</note> then may do by probability, so as that the testimony of<lb/> | |||
this 1<hi rend="superscript">st</hi> may <unclear>drill</unclear> <del>not</del> <add>continue</add> true. As if, (to take the <unclear>interview</unclear><lb/> | |||
given by <unclear>R. Clarke</unclear>) to be found run through the body<lb/> | |||
with a <unclear>hand</unclear>, and a <unclear>offense</unclear>. As it is seen to come <unclear>outside</unclear><lb/> | |||
that Home, with a Bloody Sword, if no other man <hi rend="underline">was</hi><lb/> | |||
as that <unclear>??</unclear> in the House. These <unclear>??</unclear><lb/> | |||
<add>ruled by W.</add> standing alone might form a presumption sufficiently<lb/> | |||
strong for it to be commented. And yet things and <unclear>??</unclear><lb/> | |||
of explanation <unclear>commit ably</unclear> <add>both</add> on the one hand with A's<lb/> | |||
imminence & on the other with W. veracity. For it<lb/> | |||
may be that <unclear>He</unclear> did it himself, & A. his friend <unclear>introducing</unclear> the<lb/> | |||
Sword out of the Body run out of the House in a fit of<lb/> | |||
distraction; as may be proved <hi rend="underline">fully</hi> by another W. who<lb/> | |||
heard A. expostulating with D. on his design, or <unclear>purposes</unclear>. | |||
Click Here To Edit
CERTAINTY EVIDENCE - Degrees of force
If I were to exhibit a division of Purdence according
v. Burn I 9703 , 3.
to the degrees of probability, it should be this.
Full Proof is that, which, the writings being believed,
and writing not of the probability of Innesesser.
cannot by be true As if W. defenses that he saw
ran through the body by A. alone, I presumably expire.
+ or Providentially Proof Violable + Presumptive is that, which is of itself insufficient
to convert, if nothing on the opposite side opposes, which
A- accorded D. deceased W. Writings then may do by probability, so as that the testimony of
this 1st may drill not continue true. As if, (to take the interview
given by R. Clarke) to be found run through the body
with a hand, and a offense. As it is seen to come outside
that Home, with a Bloody Sword, if no other man was
as that ?? in the House. These ??
ruled by W. standing alone might form a presumption sufficiently
strong for it to be commented. And yet things and ??
of explanation commit ably both on the one hand with A's
imminence & on the other with W. veracity. For it
may be that He did it himself, & A. his friend introducing the
Sword out of the Body run out of the House in a fit of
distraction; as may be proved fully by another W. who
heard A. expostulating with D. on his design, or purposes.
|
Identifier: | JB/050/043/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 50. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
050 |
procedure code |
||
|
043 |
certainty evidence - degrees of force |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
f1 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::[partial ec motif]]] |
||
|
16034 |
|||
