★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
Auto loaded |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
'' | <head>Civil</head><lb/><p>Whose history traces are afforded by that venerable <add> matchless </add> <lb/>monument <add> relick of antiquity</add> few if any afford any indications <lb/>of any other form of government than the monarchical <lb/>[If the Ministers of Religion, or the Counsellors <lb/>of the Monarch that is those whom the Monarch was <lb/>in the habit of consulting possessed an influence which <lb/>would now and then rise so high <add> strong </add> as to overrule <add> overlap</add> <add> overbear</add><lb/><gap/> of the Monarch himself, the Monarchy was <lb/> <gap/><gap/><gap/><gap/><gap/>, but still it was Monarchy.<lb/> The form was always monarchical, nor is there one <lb/>instance to be <gap/> with of a particular assembly <lb/>possessing an authority independent of the Monarch <lb/> <gap/> from the body of the people ] Monarchs <lb/>which they remained Monarchs had God for their<lb/>support: their will was his will: disobedience to <lb/>him was disobedience to them. </p> <p> [if the Bible was favourable to <unclear>Tilmin's</unclear> notion <lb/>in one point of view, it was favourable to Locke's <lb/>in another. There are no governments in it <lb/>but the government of Kings: on the other hand <lb/>Kings would every now and then lose their Kingdoms.]</p> <p> The Bible favoured <unclear>Tilmin</unclear> in some respects <lb/> since there are no governments in it but the government of Kings: it favoured Locke in other respects, <lb/> since <del> their</del> Kings would sometimes lose their Kingdoms. </p> | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | ||
Civil
Whose history traces are afforded by that venerable matchless
monument relick of antiquity few if any afford any indications
of any other form of government than the monarchical
[If the Ministers of Religion, or the Counsellors
of the Monarch that is those whom the Monarch was
in the habit of consulting possessed an influence which
would now and then rise so high strong as to overrule overlap overbear
of the Monarch himself, the Monarchy was
, but still it was Monarchy.
The form was always monarchical, nor is there one
instance to be with of a particular assembly
possessing an authority independent of the Monarch
from the body of the people ] Monarchs
which they remained Monarchs had God for their
support: their will was his will: disobedience to
him was disobedience to them.
[if the Bible was favourable to Tilmin's notion
in one point of view, it was favourable to Locke's
in another. There are no governments in it
but the government of Kings: on the other hand
Kings would every now and then lose their Kingdoms.]
The Bible favoured Tilmin in some respects
since there are no governments in it but the government of Kings: it favoured Locke in other respects,
since their Kings would sometimes lose their Kingdoms.
|
Identifier: | JB/100/111/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 100. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
100 |
civil code |
||
|
111 |
civil |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
e3 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
|||
|
32127 |
|||
