JB/041/449/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/041/449/001: Difference between revisions

Jancopes (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Jancopes (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


1823. May<lb/><lb/><head>Constitut. Code          Location F</head><lb/>Ch.    Justice Minister<lb/>§. <gap/> Located by whom.<lb/><lb/>1.<lb/>Question &#x2014; Of Justice<lb/>Minister, location why<lb/>in Legislature &#x2014; not in<lb/>Constitutive, nor in Ex-<lb/>-ecutive Chief?<lb/><lb/>2.<lb/>Answer. Reasons.<lb/>I. Why in Legislature &#x2014; <lb/>1. Use of this office, giving<lb/>execution and effect in<lb/>the surest manner<lb/>to Legislative will in<lb/>the case in question:<lb/>viz that of contestati-<lb/>-on between party and<lb/>party concerned: i.e.<lb/>where, instead of ob-<lb/>-sequiousness, it experi-<lb/>-ences contestation.
1823. May<lb/><lb/><head>Constitut. Code          Location F</head><lb/>Ch.    Justice Minister<lb/>§. <gap/> Located by whom.<lb/><lb/>1.<lb/>Question &#x2014; Of Justice<lb/>Minister, location why<lb/>in Legislature &#x2014; not in<lb/>Constitutive, nor in Ex-<lb/>-ecutive Chief?<lb/><lb/>2.<lb/>Answer. Reasons.<lb/>I. Why in Legislature &#x2014; <lb/>1. Use of this office, giving<lb/>execution and effect in<lb/>the surest manner<lb/>to Legislative will in<lb/>the case in question:<lb/>viz that of contestati-<lb/>-on between party and<lb/>party concerned: i.e.<lb/>where, instead of ob-<lb/>-sequiousness, it experi-<lb/>-ences contestation.<lb/><lb/>3.<lb/>In each individual<lb/>instance, suppose that<lb/>will ascertained, obe-<lb/>-quiousness can not<lb/>be too sure, nor too<lb/>prompt.<lb/><lb/>4.<lb/>Thence, the dependence<lb/>of this functionary on<lb/>legislative can not<lb/>be too immediate.<lb/><lb/>





Revision as of 15:58, 8 August 2013

'Click Here To Edit

1823. May

Constitut. Code Location F
Ch. Justice Minister
§. Located by whom.

1.
Question — Of Justice
Minister, location why
in Legislature — not in
Constitutive, nor in Ex-
-ecutive Chief?

2.
Answer. Reasons.
I. Why in Legislature —
1. Use of this office, giving
execution and effect in
the surest manner
to Legislative will in
the case in question:
viz that of contestati-
-on between party and
party concerned: i.e.
where, instead of ob-
-sequiousness, it experi-
-ences contestation.

3.
In each individual
instance, suppose that
will ascertained, obe-
-quiousness can not
be too sure, nor too
prompt.

4.
Thence, the dependence
of this functionary on
legislative can not
be too immediate.




Identifier: | JB/041/449/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 41.

Date_1

1823-05

Marginal Summary Numbering

1-7, 8 or 1 - 12 or 5

Box

041

Main Headings

Constitutional Code

Folio number

449

Info in main headings field

Constitut. Code Location I

Image

001

Titles

Category

Marginal summary sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property.

Page Numbering

E1

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

001

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in