JB/042/811/001: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 22:44, 18 August 2013

Lawyers and priests view with conjunct delight
the continually encreasing mass of solemn falshoods.
more particularly when the flavours of them, is height-
ened by the admixture which raises them to the rank
of perjury: the friend to mankind, regarding falshood
in every shape as a source of unbounded misery,
and an instrument in the hand of every crime, ne
-ver, on any occasion, relaxes in his solitude for the
exclusion of it.

23 March 1832. Is there proper? Are they the better for it?
Exclusively? If so, show how.

23 March 1832. The word Observation does
not match with the non-colloquial phraseology. Would
not Instrumental be the proper word?

Identifier: \| JB/042/811/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 42.
Date_1	1832-03-23	Marginal Summary Numbering
Box	042	Main Headings	constitutional code
Folio number	811	Info in main headings field
Image	001	Titles
Category	copy/fair copy sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering
Penner		Watermarks
Marginals		Paper Producer
Corrections	jeremy bentham	Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number	13734
Box Contents

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
-<p>Lawyers and priests view with conjunct delight<lb/> the continually <sic>encreasing</sic> mass of solemn <sic>falshoods</sic>!<lb/>more particularly when the flavours of them, <add>is</add> height-<lb/>ened by the admixture which raises them to the rank<lb/> of <hi rend="underline">perjury</hi>: the friend to mankind, regarding falshood<lb/> in every shape as a source of unbounded misery,<lb/> and an instrument in the hand of every crime, ne<lb/>-ver, on any occasion, relaxes in his solitude for the<lb/> exclusion of it.</p>
+<p>Lawyers and priests view with conjunct delight<lb/> the continually <sic>encreasing</sic> mass of solemn <sic>falshoods</sic>.<lb/>more particularly when the flavours of them, <add>is</add> height-<lb/>ened by the admixture which raises them to the rank<lb/> of <hi rend="underline">perjury</hi>: the friend to mankind, regarding falshood<lb/> in every shape as a source of unbounded misery,<lb/> and an instrument in the hand of every crime, ne<lb/>-ver, on any occasion, relaxes in his solitude for the<lb/> exclusion of it.</p>
 <p>23 March 1832. Is there proper? Are they the better for it?<lb/> <unclear>Exclusively</unclear>? If so, show how.</p>
 <p>23 March 1832. The word Observation does<lb/> not match with the non-colloquial phraseology. Would<lb/> not Instrumental be the proper word?</p>

Views

JB/042/811/001: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 22:44, 18 August 2013

Navigation

Search