★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
<p>Conduct III Non existence proved 15 <del>(1) 16 21</del> Such <gap/> is repugnant to the panoply of the Complete law. <lb/><del>Abolished lastly</del>), <add>Relinquished in fact but tacitly if at all (for the point is <lb/> <unclear>not worth</unclear> arguing)</add>, if the power had been <add>declared illegal, and</add> abolished by <lb/><unclear>express</unclear> words, it would not have been <add>so disposed of</add> without very sufficient <lb/>grounds. That over English subjects, in England or <lb/>any where else, the King should, <hi rend="superscript">[+]</hi> <note><hi rend="superscript">[+]</hi> by himself or by others.</note> exercise <del>y</del> <add>legislative</add> power, without <lb/>the concurrence of Parliament, was repugnant to the <lb/>constitution — was <del><sic>irreconciliable</sic></del> <add>repugnant to</add> [<del>at any rate to the spirit — <lb/>perhaps was to the letter of</del> <foreign><sic>Magna Charta</sic></foreign>. <del>B</del> </p> | <p>Conduct III Non existence proved 15 <del>(1) 16 21</del> Such <gap/> is repugnant to the panoply of the Complete law. <lb/><del>Abolished lastly</del>), <add>Relinquished in fact but tacitly if at all (for the point is <lb/> <unclear>not worth</unclear> arguing)</add>, if the power had been <add>declared illegal, and</add> abolished by <lb/><unclear>express</unclear> words, it would not have been <add>so disposed of</add> without very sufficient <lb/>grounds. That over English subjects, in England or <lb/>any where else, the King should, <hi rend="superscript">[+]</hi> <note><hi rend="superscript">[+]</hi> by himself or by others.</note> exercise <del>y</del> <add>legislative</add> power, without <lb/>the concurrence of Parliament, was repugnant to the <lb/>constitution — was <del><sic>irreconciliable</sic></del> <add>repugnant to</add> [<del>at any rate to the spirit — <lb/>perhaps was to the letter of</del> <foreign><sic>Magna Charta</sic></foreign>. <del>B</del> </p> | ||
<p>Till the reign of George the Second — till the year 1740 <lb/>at least, <add>as above,</add> I know not of its being <add><del>having been doubted</del></add> disputed or doubted of: and <lb/>the <gap/> of precedents, by which it has been exercised, commences <lb/> with <add>what appears as</add> the <del>take</del> first charter, <add><del>extant</del> given to</add> <del>for</del> the first Colony <del>in my</del> <lb/><del>with</del> <add>in</add> the reign of James <add>in 1606 or thereabouts</add> the 1<hi rend="superscript">st</hi> <hi rend="superscript">+</hi> <note><hi rend="superscript">+</hi> See <gap/> <gap/> in the Acts of the 13<hi rend="superscript">th</hi> Parliament relative to the Colonies — 1775. </note> <del>or if in the reign of Elizabeth.</del> </p> | <p>Till the reign of George the Second — till the year 1740 <lb/>at least, <add>as above,</add> I know not of its being <add><del>having been doubted</del></add> disputed or doubted of: and <lb/>the <gap/> of precedents, by which it has been exercised, commences <lb/> with <add>what appears as</add> the <del>take</del> first charter, <add><del>extant</del> given to</add> <del>for</del> the first Colony <del>in my</del> <lb/><del>with</del> <add>in</add> the reign of James <add>in 1606 or thereabouts</add> the 1<hi rend="superscript">st</hi> <hi rend="superscript">+</hi> <note><hi rend="superscript">+</hi> See <gap/> <gap/> in the Acts of the 13<hi rend="superscript">th</hi> Parliament relative to the Colonies — 1775.</note> <del>or if in the reign of Elizabeth.</del> </p> | ||
<p><note><del>23</del> 17 The <gap/> we <gap/> of Parliament to legislative power was not <hi rend="underline">then</hi> settled nor since.</note> <lb/>But, in <del>since</del> the day, in which the practice that originated, <lb/>the <unclear>exitensive</unclear> right of Parliament to legislative power, <lb/>was <del>by no means</del> far from being defined as now. Even within the territory <lb/>of England, in this and that and t'other <add>pretext</add> <del>ground</del>, the King <lb/>by his proclamations, would be legislating without Parliament, <lb/>and <add>even</add> in spite of Parliament. Whatever Parliament would <lb/><del>suffer him to do without complaint</del> | |||
21 15 7 July 1802 + 15 21 N. S. Wales
Conduct III Non existence proved 15 (1) 16 21 Such is repugnant to the panoply of the Complete law.
Abolished lastly), Relinquished in fact but tacitly if at all (for the point is
not worth arguing), if the power had been declared illegal, and abolished by
express words, it would not have been so disposed of without very sufficient
grounds. That over English subjects, in England or
any where else, the King should, [+] [+] by himself or by others. exercise y legislative power, without
the concurrence of Parliament, was repugnant to the
constitution — was irreconciliable repugnant to [at any rate to the spirit —
perhaps was to the letter of Magna Charta. B
Till the reign of George the Second — till the year 1740
at least, as above, I know not of its being having been doubted disputed or doubted of: and
the of precedents, by which it has been exercised, commences
with what appears as the take first charter, extant given to for the first Colony in my
with in the reign of James in 1606 or thereabouts the 1st + + See in the Acts of the 13th Parliament relative to the Colonies — 1775. or if in the reign of Elizabeth.
23 17 The we of Parliament to legislative power was not then settled nor since.
But, in since the day, in which the practice that originated,
the exitensive right of Parliament to legislative power,
was by no means far from being defined as now. Even within the territory
of England, in this and that and t'other pretext ground, the King
by his proclamations, would be legislating without Parliament,
and even in spite of Parliament. Whatever Parliament would
suffer him to do without complaint
|
Identifier: | JB/116/311/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 116. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1802-07-02 |
15-17 |
||
|
116 |
panopticon versus new south wales |
||
|
311 |
n. s. wales |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
a21 / b15 / d15 / f21 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
|||
|
37844 |
|||
