JB/116/640/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/116/640/001: Difference between revisions

Robmagin (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Robmagin (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
57
 


<p>the whole island: who could answer for his not<lb/> consenting to charge himself with two or three<lb/> spots. Year after year he had gone through the<lb/> same sort of business gratis: who would answer<lb/> for his refusal to undertake for a portion of it,<lb/> for a price. Year after year he had done the same<lb/> sort of business without authority: who could say<lb/> that with or without ordinary recompense, he might<lb/>have accepted of that authority, the effect of which<lb/> could not but be to second in such a variety of<lb/> ways, his generous endeavours. Below-above-every<lb/> where- authority, even though it were without power,<lb/> is of use. <hi rend="underline">Below</hi>, it commands information: <hi rend="underline">above,</hi><lb/> it gives a claim to notice.</p>
<p>Were these gentlemen, or either of them, so<lb/> much as consulted with on the choice?_ Nor that nei-<lb/>-ther. How could they have been? Under the auspices<lb/> of Lord Pelham- under the administration of gentlemen<lb/> on t'other side the wainscoat- places are made for<lb/> gentlemen, not gentlemen <unclear>searced</unclear> out for places. Is<lb/> it not so? a page or two will for demonstrate.</p>
<p>Would there have been any thing wild, spec-<lb/>lative, incongruous, so much as unaccustomed in<lb/> a choice guided by considerations such as above sug-<lb/>-gested? Let us look back a little. In the case of<lb/> Convicts Howard was the first investigator of the<lb/> system of abuse: Howard's was the hand first chosen<lb/> for the <del>app</del> hand first chosen for the application<lb/> of the remedy: I speak of the Penitentiary <gap/><lb/>-ment in its first intended shape. In a succeeding <hi rend="superscript">list</hi></p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 06:33, 22 August 2013

Click Here To Edit

57

the whole island: who could answer for his not
consenting to charge himself with two or three
spots. Year after year he had gone through the
same sort of business gratis: who would answer
for his refusal to undertake for a portion of it,
for a price. Year after year he had done the same
sort of business without authority: who could say
that with or without ordinary recompense, he might
have accepted of that authority, the effect of which
could not but be to second in such a variety of
ways, his generous endeavours. Below-above-every
where- authority, even though it were without power,
is of use. Below, it commands information: above,
it gives a claim to notice.

Were these gentlemen, or either of them, so
much as consulted with on the choice?_ Nor that nei-
-ther. How could they have been? Under the auspices
of Lord Pelham- under the administration of gentlemen
on t'other side the wainscoat- places are made for
gentlemen, not gentlemen searced out for places. Is
it not so? a page or two will for demonstrate.

Would there have been any thing wild, spec-
lative, incongruous, so much as unaccustomed in
a choice guided by considerations such as above sug-
-gested? Let us look back a little. In the case of
Convicts Howard was the first investigator of the
system of abuse: Howard's was the hand first chosen
for the app hand first chosen for the application
of the remedy: I speak of the Penitentiary
-ment in its first intended shape. In a succeeding list



Identifier: | JB/116/640/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 116.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

116

Main Headings

panopticon versus new south wales

Folio number

640

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

correspondence

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d57 / d58

Penner

john herbert koe

Watermarks

1800

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1800

Notes public

letter was never sent; see note 8 to letter 1747, vol. 7, and note 4 to letter 1824, vol. 7

ID Number

38173

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in