JB/121/011/003: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/121/011/003: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto upload
 
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>Marginal Corrections <lb/> Connect<hi rend="superscript">s</hi> Oberv<hi rend="superscript">s</hi>(Compensation) <lb/>(Suppression)</head><lb/><p>Suppression. </p> <p> 1.<lb/>The difference between <lb/> <hi rend="underline"><foreign>mala fide</foreign></hi> suppression <lb/> of documents and <lb/> Forgery lies not in <lb/> the mischief but <lb/> in the article of punishment and <lb/> that of faculty of <lb/> proof. </p> <p> 2. <lb/> In the instance of <lb/> J.B.<hi rend="superscript">s</hi> supplemental <lb/> Letter of 20<hi rend="superscript">th</hi> June <lb/> 1800 &amp; Boards Letter of <lb/> reference between that <lb/> and the 27<hi rend="superscript">th</hi> it would <lb/> be a point to pronopunce <lb/> upon whether the <lb/> suppression was <lb/> <foreign><hi rend="underline">bona</hi></foreign> or <hi rend="underline"><foreign>mala fide.</foreign></hi> </p> <p> 3. <lb/> proof ofg <hi rend="underline"><foreign>mala fidis</foreign></hi> <lb/>in ther suppression <lb/> of J B<hi rend="superscript">s</hi> supplemental <lb/>< letter of 20 June 1800 <lb/> (if <del> suppd</del> suppressed) <lb/> its putting a flat <lb/>contradiction on the <lb/> pretended increase <lb/> of terms. </p> <p> 4. <lb/> Can put it then <lb/> the p[oints of agreement <lb/> &amp; disagreement <lb/> between <foreign>mala fide</foreign> <lb/> suppression &amp; forgery. <lb/> 1. Obliterative forgery - <lb/> If instead of suppressing <lb/>the entire letter <lb/> (20 June 1800) supplemental <lb/> to the Memorial <lb/> Long had obliterated <lb/> the saving Clause to <lb/> a like effect in the <lb/>body of the Memorial <lb/>the effect would <lb/> have been the same. </p> <p> 5<lb/> 2 So also by creative <lb/> Forgery the same <lb/> effect might have <lb/> been produced. </p> <pb/> <p> Perfidy </p> <!-- note on different ink --><note>Think of the material that mans <gap/ <gap/> must be made of who <gap/> <gap/> when <gap/> waits at his command - and having the choice of means - <gap/> in preference a course of eight years perfidy</note><lb/><p> 1. <lb/> the ignominy of <lb/> perfidy is not incurred <lb/> wantonly <lb/> nor without a <lb/> specific motive by <lb/> any body - nor in <lb/> particular was on <lb/> the particular <lb/> occasion in question <lb/> by <del>Pitt</del> Pitt.</p> <p> 2. he had a particular <lb/> &amp; cogent reason <lb/> for it - the fear <lb/> of putting hs <lb/> habitual messmate <lb/> L<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> Spencer out of <lb/> humour. - </p> <p>3. <lb/> Of L<hi rend="superscript">d</hi>
 
Spence's opposition <lb/> J.B. has <lb/> the proof in his <lb/> lordship's hand. </p> <p> 4. <lb/> Had it not been <lb/> for that cogent <lb/> reason JB <sic>admitts</sic> <lb/> that Pitt would have <lb/> carried the Establishment <lb/> into effect. </p> <p>5<lb/> Pitt would no <lb/> more have broken <lb/> his word than <lb/> he would have<lb/> concurred in the <lb/> exercise of legislative <lb/> power if the object <lb/> of the conspiracy <lb/> could have been <lb/> effected otherwise. </p> <pb/> <p> (Perfidy.) </p> <p> 6 <lb/> if a man were <lb/> uniform in the <lb/> breach of his promises <lb/> it would <lb/> come to the same <lb/> thing as if he <lb/> were so in the <lb/> observance of them. </p> <p>7. <lb/> The influence is - <lb/> not that Pitt breaks <lb/> promises so often <lb/> as he keeps them - <lb/> he break<del>s</del> them <lb/> no oftener than it <lb/> answers the convenience<lb/> or fancied <lb/> interest of the <lb/>moment. - </p> <p> 8. <lb/> Had the uneasiness <lb/> from the shame <lb/> of having broke <lb/> his promise ever <lb/> surmounted that <lb/> which caused his <lb/> breaking it - he <lb/> would have <lb/>repented &amp; kept it - <lb/> this was JB<hi rend="superscript">s</hi> <lb/> chance. </p><!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
 
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 14:13, 1 September 2013

'Click Here To Edit

Marginal Corrections
Connects Obervs(Compensation)
(Suppression)

Suppression.

1.
The difference between
mala fide suppression
of documents and
Forgery lies not in
the mischief but
in the article of punishment and
that of faculty of
proof.

2.
In the instance of
J.B.s supplemental
Letter of 20th June
1800 & Boards Letter of
reference between that
and the 27th it would
be a point to pronopunce
upon whether the
suppression was
bona or mala fide.

3.
proof ofg mala fidis
in ther suppression
of J Bs supplemental
< letter of 20 June 1800
(if suppd suppressed)
its putting a flat
contradiction on the
pretended increase
of terms.

4.
Can put it then
the p[oints of agreement
& disagreement
between mala fide
suppression & forgery.
1. Obliterative forgery -
If instead of suppressing
the entire letter
(20 June 1800) supplemental
to the Memorial
Long had obliterated
the saving Clause to
a like effect in the
body of the Memorial
the effect would
have been the same.

5
2 So also by creative
Forgery the same
effect might have
been produced.


---page break---

Perfidy

Think of the material that mans <gap/ must be made of who when waits at his command - and having the choice of means - in preference a course of eight years perfidy

1.
the ignominy of
perfidy is not incurred
wantonly
nor without a
specific motive by
any body - nor in
particular was on
the particular
occasion in question
by Pitt Pitt.

2. he had a particular
& cogent reason
for it - the fear
of putting hs
habitual messmate
Ld Spencer out of
humour. -

3.
Of Ld Spence's opposition
J.B. has
the proof in his
lordship's hand.

4.
Had it not been
for that cogent
reason JB admitts
that Pitt would have
carried the Establishment
into effect.

5
Pitt would no
more have broken
his word than
he would have
concurred in the
exercise of legislative
power if the object
of the conspiracy
could have been
effected otherwise.


---page break---

(Perfidy.)

6
if a man were
uniform in the
breach of his promises
it would
come to the same
thing as if he
were so in the
observance of them.

7.
The influence is -
not that Pitt breaks
promises so often
as he keeps them -
he breaks them
no oftener than it
answers the convenience
or fancied
interest of the
moment. -

8.
Had the uneasiness
from the shame
of having broke
his promise ever
surmounted that
which caused his
breaking it - he
would have
repented & kept it -
this was JBs
chance.


Identifier: | JB/121/011/003"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 121.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

1-13, 15, 1-8

Box

121

Main Headings

Panopticon

Folio number

011

Info in main headings field

Marginal Contents Compensation Suppression Perfidy Connectg Observs

Image

003

Titles

Offer of compensation / Suppression / Perfidy

Category

Marginal summary sheet

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property.

Page Numbering

A8 / F8

Penner

Watermarks

CW 1799

Marginals

Paper Producer

C. Abbit Lees

Corrections

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Produced in Year

1799

Notes public

ID Number

003

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in