★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
Auto upload |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
''This | <head>Marginal <lb/> Connect<hi rend="superscript">s</hi> Observ<hi rend="superscript">s</hi>(Incapacity<lb/>(Killing no murder</head> <lb/> | ||
<p>Killing no Murder</p> <p> 7. <lb/>2. Pitt's speech when <lb/> he was told of the <lb/> <unclear>loss</unclear>if the season <lb/> through the (probably <lb/> wilful) neglext of <lb/> his own instruments. <lb/>He imputed it to <lb/>J.B. & exulted in it.</p> <p> 8<lb/> In the whole seven <lb/> years never the <lb/> least expression of <lb/> sympathy from Long <lb/> - i.e. to JB. for J.B<hi rend="superscript">s</hi><lb/> <unclear>sufferings</unclear> - only at <lb/> first for Pitts violated <lb/> honour. - </p> <p>Proof of mala <lb/> fides <lb/> 8. The <gap/> a fraud <lb/> or <gap/> of these <lb/> letters - so <gap/> after <lb/> this he writes the <lb/> <gap/></p> <gap/> <lb/> As may do what he <lb/> pleases in the <gap/> <lb/> <gap/> - and <lb/> to some men use a <lb/> very <sic>burthernsome</sic> <gap/> <lb/> of <gap/> <gap/> <gap/><lb/> *truth - <lb/> better to have it <gap/> <add> <gap/> </add> <lb/> <gap/> them with it. </p> <p> Conclusion <lb/>Justification <gap/> <lb/> Had the <gap/> been <lb/> that of Statesmen <add> gap/> they <lb/> might have passed thereafter <lb/> in <gap/>. But their <gap/> <add> <del> <gap/> </del> </add> having been <lb/> that of malefactors, <lb/> their place is among <lb/> malefactors. <lb/> <unclear>&c</unclear></p> <p>Conclusion. <gap/> <lb/> <del>5</del> Pun;ic <gap/> <gap/> <lb/> 1. To give to the Establishment <lb/> at least the <gap/> <lb/> promised <lb/>2. <gap/> <gap/> to <lb/> J.B. for past <gap/> <lb/> and humiliations </p> <p> 3. <gap/> and the Authors <lb/> of the <gap/> -& breach <lb/> of public <unclear>fuilli</unclear>. </p> <p> L<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> Pelham applied to <lb/> as a Mediator. </p> <pb/><p> Inadvertence</p> <p> All pretences of it are <lb/> out of the question for <lb/> the <unclear>Duke</unclear> A man to say<add> says <gap/> </add> <lb/> he has read the <gap/> <gap/> <lb/> he understands the effect <lb/> is it, <lb/> <del> Baldw</del> Civil List <lb/> <gap/> Times 23 March <lb/> 1802 <lb/>"W Baldwin Esq" as a <lb/> reward for his advice in <lb/> Counsel to the Secretary of State <lb/> in 1800 £1.624 <lb/>1801 655 7<hi rend="superscript">'</hi> 6<hi rend="superscript">d</hi><lb/> 1802 547 12<hi rend="superscript">'</hi></p> <p><del>[the Letter <gap/> only <lb/> the greatest number: <del> but </del> <lb/> <hi rend="underline"><gap/></hi> the <hi rend="underline">increase:</hi> but the <lb/> design in <gap/> the </del> </p><p> The <gap/> prior <lb/> <gap/> the <gap/> <lb/> The Treasury friend <hi rend="underline">acts</hi><lb/> the Duke <unclear><hi rend="underline">prinequili</hi></unclear></p> <p> <unclear>Pulman's case <hi rend="underline">harsh</hi>:</unclear><lb/> <gap/> <hi rend="underline">illegal</hi>. </p> <p><del> The Duke &c had as <lb/> sure of a plan for subverting <lb/> the Construction, ,gap/> <gap/> <lb/> least.</p><p> <gap/> Jury decides <lb/> there be <gap/> <gap/> <lb/> <gap/> the money <gap/> <lb/> Parliament in case of <lb/> danger and think he <lb/> was <gap/> of the danger. </p> <p> The Duke conceives that <lb/> he may annul <add> rescind</add> an <lb/> imperative act of Parl' <lb/> if it be an improper: <lb/> and that he a judge <lb/> of the impropriety. </p> <p> He also concurs that <lb/> it belongs to him to size <lb/> up the minds of the <lb/> <gap/> if it be probable <lb/> that they would <lb/> <gap/> <gap/> <lb/> and he concurs <lb/> that it is probable.</del> </p> <p> It is not worth <gap/> <lb/> over these <gap/> that <lb/> man set to make <lb/> execute or annull <add> repeal <add> abrogate</add></add> <lb/> laws. </p> <p> Conclusion Addington <lb/> G. <gap/> said if the <lb/> <gap/> Administrator<lb/> 1. because of the power it <lb/> gives me to <gap/> of it <lb/> 2. because it will be the <lb/> subject of a <gap/> <unclear>picker</unclear></p> <p> Dispensing Power </p> 3 1<lb/> the illegality of the <lb/> Dukes & King's exercise <lb/> of the dispensing <lb/> power could not <lb/> but have been <lb/> fully known to them - <lb/> they had full notice <lb/> of it. - p.a. </p> <p> 2 <lb/> It was <add> not </add> a mere <add> <del> so cut a <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> </del> </add> <lb/> honest misconstruction <lb/> of the Act. p.a. </p> <p> <del>5</del> 3. <lb/> the Act has no <lb/> words in it on which <lb/> any misconstruction <lb/> could be put. p.2.<lb/> <del>4</del> </p><p> <del> 6 </del> 4 <lb/> The Duke says he has <lb/> read the Acts - nut <lb/> if this were admitted <lb/> as a proof of misconstruction - <lb/> any man <lb/> in his place might <lb/> overrule an Act of <lb/> Parliament on condition <lb/> of pretending to read <lb/> in it what is not <lb/> there p.2.3. </p> <p> 12 5 <lb/> Weakness of intellect <lb/> no excuse - <lb/> he meant no <lb/> harm - that is when <lb/> he committed the <lb/> crime he did not <lb/> think there was <lb/> any danger of his <lb/> being punished for <lb/> it. - p.4 </p> 13 6 <lb/> All he chose to think <lb/> of was that he was <lb/> serving his friends <lb/> but he could not <lb/> but know that it was by <sic>manipling</sic> <lb/> on the law. - p.4.<lb/> 5. </p> <p>1 <hi rend="underline"><gap/></hi> <lb/> 2. Imprisonment <lb/> not according to <lb/> <gap/> + <lb/>3. 40 days, only <gap/> <lb/> this by ruling by fraud. <lb/> 4 <gap/> law to create the <lb/> <gap/> </p> <pb/><p> Dispensing Power <lb/> <p>7 <lb/> the Duke learnt from <lb/> Baldwin that the <lb/> only person who <lb/> could have to complain <lb/> of it was one <lb/> from whom he had <lb/> no danger to apprehend. </p> <p> Baldwin's account <lb/> of JB. p.5, 6,7. </p> <p> <add> 15 </add> 8.<lb/> The genuineness of <lb/> it is established by <lb/> intrinsic evidence. <lb/> p.7 </p> <p> 9. <lb/> 1. Being a matter <lb/> of law the Duke <lb/> thought King alone <lb/> would be responsible <lb/> for it - as he took <lb/> no money for it - <lb/> & it was only to <lb/> oblige hid friend - <lb/> p.8. </p> <p> 10<lb/> 2. Their best chance <lb/> for escape is the <lb/> ridicule attached to <lb/> the idea of a great <lb/> crime committed <lb/> by one personally <lb/> so little. - p.9. </p> <p> <add> 18 </add> 11. <lb/> This plea ought not <lb/> to be admitted even <lb/> in extenuation - <lb/> Not only in itself <lb/> the offence was mischievous -<lb/> but as a <lb/> precedent if unpunished <lb/> it would be dangerous. <lb/> p.10, 11 </p> <p> 7 12. <lb/> That the crime was <lb/> unnecessary since the <lb/> object of the conspiracy <lb/> could have been equally <lb/> attained without <lb/> it - neither <lb/> justification nor <lb/> extenuation. p.11 </p> <pb/><!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | |||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | ||
Marginal
Connects Observs(Incapacity
(Killing no murder
Killing no Murder
7.
2. Pitt's speech when
he was told of the
lossif the season
through the (probably
wilful) neglext of
his own instruments.
He imputed it to
J.B. & exulted in it.
8
In the whole seven
years never the
least expression of
sympathy from Long
- i.e. to JB. for J.Bs
sufferings - only at
first for Pitts violated
honour. -
Proof of mala
fides
8. The a fraud
or of these
letters - so after
this he writes the
As may do what he
pleases in the
- and
to some men use a
very burthernsome
of
*truth -
better to have it
them with it.
Conclusion
Justification
Had the been
that of Statesmen gap/> they
might have passed thereafter
in . But their <add> having been
that of malefactors,
their place is among
malefactors.
&c
Conclusion.
5 Pun;ic
1. To give to the Establishment
at least the
promised
2. to
J.B. for past
and humiliations
3. and the Authors
of the -& breach
of public fuilli.
Ld Pelham applied to
as a Mediator.
---page break---
Inadvertence
All pretences of it are
out of the question for
the Duke A man to say says
he has read the
he understands the effect
is it,
Baldw Civil List
Times 23 March
1802
"W Baldwin Esq" as a
reward for his advice in
Counsel to the Secretary of State
in 1800 £1.624
1801 655 7' 6d
1802 547 12'
[the Letter only
the greatest number: but
the increase: but the
design in the
The prior
the
The Treasury friend acts
the Duke prinequili
Pulman's case harsh:
illegal.
The Duke &c had as
sure of a plan for subverting
the Construction, ,gap/>
least.
Jury decides
there be
the money
Parliament in case of
danger and think he
was of the danger.
The Duke conceives that
he may annul rescind an
imperative act of Parl'
if it be an improper:
and that he a judge
of the impropriety.
He also concurs that
it belongs to him to size
up the minds of the
if it be probable
that they would
and he concurs
that it is probable.
It is not worth
over these that
man set to make
execute or annull repeal <add> abrogate</add>
laws.
Conclusion Addington
G. said if the
Administrator
1. because of the power it
gives me to of it
2. because it will be the
subject of a picker
Dispensing Power
3 1
the illegality of the
Dukes & King's exercise
of the dispensing
power could not
but have been
fully known to them -
they had full notice
of it. - p.a.
2
It was not a mere so cut a
honest misconstruction
of the Act. p.a.
5 3.
the Act has no
words in it on which
any misconstruction
could be put. p.2.
4
6 4
The Duke says he has
read the Acts - nut
if this were admitted
as a proof of misconstruction -
any man
in his place might
overrule an Act of
Parliament on condition
of pretending to read
in it what is not
there p.2.3.
12 5
Weakness of intellect
no excuse -
he meant no
harm - that is when
he committed the
crime he did not
think there was
any danger of his
being punished for
it. - p.4
13 6
All he chose to think
of was that he was
serving his friends
but he could not
but know that it was by manipling
on the law. - p.4.
5.
1
2. Imprisonment
not according to
+
3. 40 days, only
this by ruling by fraud.
4 law to create the
---page break---
Dispensing Power
7
the Duke learnt from
Baldwin that the
only person who
could have to complain
of it was one
from whom he had
no danger to apprehend.
Baldwin's account
of JB. p.5, 6,7.
15 8.
The genuineness of
it is established by
intrinsic evidence.
p.7
9.
1. Being a matter
of law the Duke
thought King alone
would be responsible
for it - as he took
no money for it -
& it was only to
oblige hid friend -
p.8.
10
2. Their best chance
for escape is the
ridicule attached to
the idea of a great
crime committed
by one personally
so little. - p.9.
18 11.
This plea ought not
to be admitted even
in extenuation -
Not only in itself
the offence was mischievous -
but as a
precedent if unpunished
it would be dangerous.
p.10, 11
7 12.
That the crime was
unnecessary since the
object of the conspiracy
could have been equally
attained without
it - neither
justification nor
extenuation. p.11
---page break---
|
Identifier: | JB/121/013/003"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 121. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1-5, 1-6, 1-19 |
|||
|
121 |
Panopticon |
||
|
013 |
Marginal Contents Incapacity Killing no murder Connectg Observs |
||
|
003 |
Incapacity / Killing no murder / Dispensing Power |
||
|
Marginal summary sheet |
2 |
||
|
Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property. |
A10 / F10 |
||
|
CW 1799 |
|||
|
C. Abbit Lees |
|||
|
1799 |
|||
|
003 |
|||
