JB/121/013/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/121/013/002: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<head>10 (Marginal Content<lb/>(Incapacity )<lb/>(Killing is murder)Connect<hi rend="superscript">s</hi> Observ<hi rend="superscript">s</hi></head><lb/><p> Incapacity </p> <p> 1 <lb/><unclear>Oxenshern's</unclear> recognition <lb/> of the incapacity <lb/> common <lb/> among men in <lb/> office </p> <note><gap/> description no <gap/> <lb/> of <gap/> ever attempted <lb/> or induced.   <gap/> <lb/>then but what might <lb/> equally have been done <lb/> by the worst <gap/> </note><lb/> <note>incapacity <unclear>numbering</unclear><lb/> 7. B.1. observation</note><lb/><p> 2. <lb/> Propensity of the <lb/> public to take <lb/> any man for a <lb/> great man whom <lb/> they see in a <lb/> great place. </p><note>1. Badly and slowly <lb/>2. Badly and quickly <lb/>3. Well and slowly <lb/>4. Well and quickly.<lb/>to find you. well <lb/>not had us look very <add> low </add> far <lb/>down in the H. of Commons</note><lb/> <p> 3. <lb/> The necessity of <lb/> a tongue for Parliament <lb/> introduces <lb/> men with little <lb/> heads. - </p> <p> 4. <lb/> Who fill the <lb/> under offices with <lb/>incapable hands. </p> <p> 5 <lb/> Hence the advertisement <lb/> for places .</p> <!-- text in different ink --> <p>They <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <lb/> <gap/> it may <gap/> him <lb/> <gap/> for <gap/> <gap/> <lb/> <add> <gap/> . </add> Killing </p> <p> The plot at his <add> man's </add> life <lb/> is made through his <lb/> reputation. </p> <p> Every <gap/> the cast <lb/> <gap/> in order to <gap/> <lb/>be <gap/> <gap/> cut! </p> <p>Thus in Palmer's case <lb/> then the unguarded <lb/> word is the only one taken <lb/> notice of.</p> <p> <gap/> <gap/> in the <lb/> <gap/> of the <gap/> Shows <lb/> <gap/> <gap/> a cause <lb/> of forfeiture. </p><pb/><p> Note <lb/> Long's <gap/> J.B. <lb/> expressed in the ill will <lb/> of the neighbourhood <lb/> from the Tothill Fields <lb/> Bill - and <gap/> <lb/> apology - </p><p> To destroy <gap/> <gap/> of <lb/> mind was therefore the object. </p> <p> Pitt <gap/> to J.B. which <lb/> <unclear>Frankland</unclear> to Caleb Williams. <lb/> but they a <hi rend="underline"><gap/></hi> </p> <p> 1. In then that man <lb/>- <del> Long </del> <gap/> had left <lb/> his <gap/> : he takes <lb/> Opium talks as <lb/> to recall it <gap/> is in <lb/> <add> <del> Wilberforce </del> </add> a course of torture under <lb/> Mr. Pitt. <lb/> Palmer before 8 <lb/> months by Longs <lb/> treachery. </p> <p> The triumph <add> <gap/> </add> if disposition <lb/> our most <add> ingenious </add> <lb/> <gap/> more complicit<lb/> <add> and <gap/> </add> in this case than in <lb/> <gap/>.  In man it <lb/> <gap/> my case it <gap/> <add> has </add> <lb/> only been looked for : <lb/> in Mr <unclear>Halman's</unclear> case <lb/>it had been proved. </p> <p>A midst such a list <lb/> of <add> abnormal <add> abomination </add></add>examples to which <lb/> such an administration <lb/> must have been <lb/> from birth, it would <lb/> be a <add> <gap/> </add> service done to <lb/> <gap/> if those who <lb/> have been victims <lb/> or <gap/> to <gap/> <lb/> could come forward <lb/> must give the penalty <lb/> <gap/> of the information. <lb/> <gap/> <lb/> those pages ever been <lb/> made public, those <lb/> who may <del> then </del> be <lb/> disposed to contribute <lb/> their minds <del> will </del> <lb/> may in my view <lb/> abide it or should <lb/> be <del> contribute </del> confound <lb/> fund in Treasury <lb/> in which they will <lb/> not be lost. </p> <pb/><p> Killing no murder </p><p> 1 <lb/> The alleged conspiracy <lb/> against J.B.<hi rend="superscript">s</hi><lb/> life not criminal <lb/> because not punishable</p> <p> 2. <lb/> His death would <lb/> have been very <lb/> desirable to them. </p> <p> 3 <lb/> <del> He </del>  It was an object <lb/> with them so far <lb/> as it could be <lb/> prosecuted with <lb/> <sic>compleat</sic> impunity. </p><p> 4. <lb/> In this age and <lb/> nation the life of <lb/> an obnoxious individual <lb/> cannot <lb/> be attempted with <lb/> hope of impunity <lb/> otherwise than by <lb/> the slow poison <lb/> of mental injury - <lb/> otherwise in Italy. </p> <p> 5 <lb/> In France <del> it was </del> <lb/> in the case of <lb/> <unclear>Chalotais</unclear> it was <lb/> attempted but <lb/> not with impunity. </p> <p> 6 <lb/> Additional reasons <lb/> for supposing this <lb/> to have been the <lb/> plan. <lb/> 1. Abbott judgment <lb/> on the <unclear>basturity</unclear> <lb/> of their conduct <lb/> in June 1798. </p> <pb/><p> Conclusion <lb/> Justification answered. </p> <p> They had a right to exercise <lb/> their judgment <lb/> - if wrong, in <gap/> error <lb/> in judgment - proof of <lb/> error gives no right to <lb/> J.B. to call  <gap/> either <lb/> the past or present Administration <lb/> to sit in the <lb/> fort against this judgment. </p> <p><unclear>Answer</unclear> </p> <p>1.  They do not pretend to <lb/> disapprove of it, notwithstanding <lb/>the call upon <lb/> them so to be in their own <lb/> justification </p> <p> 2. This reserve an act <lb/> out of kindness to J.B. </p> <p> 3.  If their opinion had <lb/> ever been all and, they <lb/> could have obtained as <lb/> much publicity, to justify <lb/> their conduct.  their <lb/> conduct having been so <gap/> <lb/>with that offence.</p> <p> 4.As <gap/> of him not <lb/> the cause - they look <lb/> many times and study <lb/> in considering how to repeal <lb/> it than would have been justified <lb/> for the accomplishment <lb/> of it. </p> <p> 5. The Act is  <gap/> - As Ministers they <lb/> might have applied for <lb/> the Repeal or Amendment <lb/> of it - but they never <lb/> did. </p> <p>6.  The Finance Committee <lb/> had approved <lb/> it in strong terms - and <lb/> censured them for the delay. <lb/> They were <gap/> called <lb/> <gap/> either to allow <lb/> their <gap/> or to <lb/> justify it - they did <lb/> neither. </p> <p> 7.  They propose an <gap/> <lb/> to execute it as <lb/> their preferred <gap/> <lb/> <gap/> - this would not <lb/> be justifiable of King's thoughts <lb/> is but in <gap/> </p> <p>8.  Is it worth while to <gap/> <lb/> the public <gap/> for this difference?<lb/> 9. Would they have <lb/> had <gap/> to a conduct <lb/> so <gap/> with <lb/>duplicity, perfidy and <lb/> inhumanity if they <lb/> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <lb/> him and by the <gap/> <lb/> exercise of their lawful <lb/> power. </p> <p> 10. Saying a few words <lb/> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> in the <lb/> way of excuses. is no proof <lb/> of <hi rend="underline"><foreign>bona fides</foreign></hi>: if it was <lb/> the vilest <gap/> would <gap/> <lb/> a sure <gap/> for clearing himself<lb/> [+] <note>When they all <gap/> matter of fact by way of exercise, the question is whether they believe in it themselves?</note></p>
<head>10 (Marginal Content<lb/>(Incapacity )<lb/>(Killing is murder)Connect<hi rend="superscript">s</hi> Observ<hi rend="superscript">s</hi></head><lb/>
 
<p><gap/> description no <gap/> <lb/> of reason ever attempted <lb/> or induced.  <gap/> <lb/>then but what might <lb/> equally have been done <lb/> by the worst <gap/> </p><lb/>  
<p>incapacity <unclear>numbering</unclear><lb/> 7. B.1. observation</p><lb/>
<p>1. Badly and slowly <lb/>2. Badly and quickly <lb/>3. Well and slowly <lb/>4. Well and quickly.<lb/>to find you. well <lb/>not had us look very <add> low </add> far <lb/>down in the H. of Commons</p>
 
<pb/>
 
<head> Incapacity </head>  
<p> 1 <lb/>Oxenstern's recognition <lb/> of the incapacity <lb/> common <lb/> among men in <lb/> office </p>  
 
<p> 2. <lb/> Propensity of the <lb/> public to take <lb/> any man for a <lb/> great man whom <lb/> they see in a <lb/> great place. </p><lb/>  
<p> 3. <lb/> The necessity of <lb/> a tongue for Parliament <lb/> introduces <lb/> men with little <lb/> heads. - </p>  
 
<p> 4. <lb/> Who fill the <lb/> under offices with <lb/>incapable hands. </p>  
 
<p> 5 <lb/> Hence the advertisement <lb/> for places .</p>  
 
<!-- text in different ink -->  
 
<p>They <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <lb/> <gap/> it may afford him <lb/> <gap/> for <gap/> <gap/> <lb/> <add> <gap/> . </add> Killing </p>  
 
<p> The plot at his <add> man's </add> life <lb/> is made through his <lb/> reputation. </p>  
 
<p> Every <gap/> the cast <lb/> <gap/> in order to <gap/> <lb/>be <gap/> <gap/> cut! </p>  
 
<p>Thus in Palmer's case <lb/> then the unguarded <lb/> word is the only one taken <lb/> notice of.</p>  
 
<p> <gap/> <gap/> in the <lb/> <gap/> of the <gap/> Shows <lb/> <gap/> <gap/> a cause <lb/> of forfeiture. </p>
 
<pb/>
 
<p> Note <lb/> Long's <gap/> J.B. <lb/> expressed in the ill will <lb/> of the neighbourhood <lb/> from the Tothill Fields <lb/> Bill - and <gap/> <lb/> apology - </p>
 
<p> To destroy that power of <lb/> mind was therefore the object. </p>  
 
<p> Pitt &amp;c to J.B. which <lb/> <unclear>Frankland</unclear> to Caleb Williams. <lb/> but they a <hi rend="underline"><gap/></hi> </p> <p> 1. In then that man <lb/>- <del> Long </del> <gap/> had left <lb/> his <gap/> : he takes <lb/> Opium talks as <lb/> to recall it <gap/> is in <lb/> <add> <del> Wilberforce </del> </add> a course of torture under <lb/> Mr. Pitt. <lb/> Palmer before 8 <lb/> months by Longs <lb/> treachery. </p>  
 
<p> The triumph <add>incapable </add> if disposition <lb/> our most <add> ingenious </add> <lb/> <gap/> more complicit<lb/> <add> and <gap/> </add> in this case than in <lb/> <gap/>.  In man it <lb/> <gap/> my case it <gap/> <add> has </add> <lb/> only been looked for : <lb/> in Mr <unclear>Halman's</unclear> case <lb/>it had been proved. </p>  
 
<p>A midst such a list <lb/> of <add> abnormal <add> abomination </add></add>examples to which <lb/> such an administration <lb/> must have been <lb/> from birth, it would <lb/> be a <add> rich </add> service done to <lb/> <gap/> if those who <lb/> have been victims <lb/> or <gap/> to <gap/> <lb/> could come forward <lb/> must give the penalty <lb/> <gap/> of the information. <lb/> <gap/> <lb/> those pages ever been <lb/> made public, those <lb/> who may <del> then </del> be <lb/> disposed to contribute <lb/> their minds <del> will </del> <lb/> may in my view <lb/> abide it or should <lb/> be <del> contribute </del> confound <lb/> fund in Treasury <lb/> in which they will <lb/> not be lost. </p>  
 
<pb/>
 
<head> Killing no murder </head>
 
<p> 1 <lb/> The alleged conspiracy <lb/> against J.B.<hi rend="superscript">s</hi><lb/> life not criminal <lb/> because not punishable</p>  
 
<p> 2. <lb/> His death would <lb/> have been very <lb/> desirable to them. </p>  
 
<p> 3 <lb/> <del> He </del>  It was an object <lb/> with them so far <lb/> as it could be <lb/> prosecuted with <lb/> <sic>compleat</sic> impunity. </p>
 
<p> 4. <lb/> In this age and <lb/> nation the life of <lb/> an obnoxious individual <lb/> cannot <lb/> be attempted with <lb/> hope of impunity <lb/> otherwise than by <lb/> the slow poison <lb/> of mental injury - <lb/> otherwise in Italy. </p>  
 
<p> 5 <lb/> In France <del> it was </del> <lb/> in the case of <lb/> <unclear>Chalotais</unclear> it was <lb/> attempted but <lb/> not with impunity. </p>  
 
<p> 6 <lb/> Additional reasons <lb/> for supposing this <lb/> to have been the <lb/> plan. <lb/> 1. Abbott judgment <lb/> on the <unclear>basturity</unclear> <lb/> of their conduct <lb/> in June 1798. </p>  
 
<pb/>
 
<p> Conclusion <lb/> Justification answered. </p>  
 
<p> They had a right to exercise <lb/> their judgment <lb/> - if wrong, in <gap/> error <lb/> in judgment - proof of <lb/> error gives no right to <lb/> J.B. to call  <gap/> either <lb/> the past or present Administration <lb/> to sit in the <lb/> fort against this judgment. </p>  
 
<p>Answer </p>  
 
<p>1.  They do not pretend to <lb/> disapprove of it, notwithstanding <lb/>the call upon <lb/> them so to be in their own <lb/> justification </p>  
 
<p> 2. This reserve an act <lb/> out of kindness to J.B. </p>  
 
<p> 3.  If their opinion had <lb/> ever been all and, they <lb/> could have obtained as <lb/> much publicity, to justify <lb/> their conduct.  their <lb/> conduct having been so <gap/> <lb/>with that offence.</p>  
 
<p> 4.As <gap/> of him not <lb/> the cause - they look <lb/> many times and study <lb/> in considering how to repeal <lb/> it than would have been justified <lb/> for the accomplishment <lb/> of it. </p>  
 
<p> 5. The Act is  <gap/> - As Ministers they <lb/> might have applied for <lb/> the Repeal or Amendment <lb/> of it - but they never <lb/> did. </p>  
 
<p>6.  The Finance Committee <lb/> had approved <lb/> it in strong terms - and <lb/> censured them for the delay. <lb/> They were <gap/> called <lb/> <gap/> either to allow <lb/> their <gap/> or to <lb/> justify it - they did <lb/> neither. </p>  
 
<p> 7.  They propose an <gap/> <lb/> to execute it as <lb/> their preferred <gap/> <lb/> <gap/> - this would not <lb/> be justifiable of King's thoughts <lb/> is but in <gap/> </p>  
 
<p>8.  Is it worth while to <gap/> <lb/> the public <gap/> for this difference?<lb/> </p>
<p>9. Would they have <lb/> had <gap/> to a conduct <lb/> so <gap/> with <lb/>duplicity, perfidy and <lb/> inhumanity if they <lb/> <gap/> <gap/> compassed <lb/> him and by the <gap/> <lb/> exercise of their lawful <lb/> power. </p>  
 
<p> 10. Saying a few words <lb/> on each occasion in the <lb/> way of excuses. is no proof <lb/> of <hi rend="underline"><foreign>bona fides</foreign></hi>: if it was <lb/> the vilest <gap/> would <gap/> <lb/> a sure <gap/> for clearing himself<lb/> [+] <note>When they all <gap/> matter of fact by way of exercise, the question is whether they believe in it themselves?</note></p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 09:19, 10 September 2013

'Click Here To Edit

10 (Marginal Content
(Incapacity )
(Killing is murder)Connects Observs

description no
of reason ever attempted
or induced.
then but what might
equally have been done
by the worst


incapacity numbering
7. B.1. observation


1. Badly and slowly
2. Badly and quickly
3. Well and slowly
4. Well and quickly.
to find you. well
not had us look very low far
down in the H. of Commons


---page break---

Incapacity

1
Oxenstern's recognition
of the incapacity
common
among men in
office

2.
Propensity of the
public to take
any man for a
great man whom
they see in a
great place.


3.
The necessity of
a tongue for Parliament
introduces
men with little
heads. -

4.
Who fill the
under offices with
incapable hands.

5
Hence the advertisement
for places .


They
it may afford him
for
. Killing

The plot at his man's life
is made through his
reputation.

Every the cast
in order to
be cut!

Thus in Palmer's case
then the unguarded
word is the only one taken
notice of.

in the
of the Shows
a cause
of forfeiture.


---page break---

Note
Long's J.B.
expressed in the ill will
of the neighbourhood
from the Tothill Fields
Bill - and
apology -

To destroy that power of
mind was therefore the object.

Pitt &c to J.B. which
Frankland to Caleb Williams.
but they a

1. In then that man
- Long had left
his  : he takes
Opium talks as
to recall it is in
Wilberforce a course of torture under
Mr. Pitt.
Palmer before 8
months by Longs
treachery.

The triumph incapable if disposition
our most ingenious
more complicit
and in this case than in
. In man it
my case it has
only been looked for :
in Mr Halman's case
it had been proved.

A midst such a list
of abnormal <add> abomination </add>examples to which
such an administration
must have been
from birth, it would
be a rich service done to
if those who
have been victims
or to
could come forward
must give the penalty
of the information.

those pages ever been
made public, those
who may then be
disposed to contribute
their minds will
may in my view
abide it or should
be contribute confound
fund in Treasury
in which they will
not be lost.


---page break---

Killing no murder

1
The alleged conspiracy
against J.B.s
life not criminal
because not punishable

2.
His death would
have been very
desirable to them.

3
He It was an object
with them so far
as it could be
prosecuted with
compleat impunity.

4.
In this age and
nation the life of
an obnoxious individual
cannot
be attempted with
hope of impunity
otherwise than by
the slow poison
of mental injury -
otherwise in Italy.

5
In France it was
in the case of
Chalotais it was
attempted but
not with impunity.

6
Additional reasons
for supposing this
to have been the
plan.
1. Abbott judgment
on the basturity
of their conduct
in June 1798.


---page break---

Conclusion
Justification answered.

They had a right to exercise
their judgment
- if wrong, in error
in judgment - proof of
error gives no right to
J.B. to call either
the past or present Administration
to sit in the
fort against this judgment.

Answer

1. They do not pretend to
disapprove of it, notwithstanding
the call upon
them so to be in their own
justification

2. This reserve an act
out of kindness to J.B.

3. If their opinion had
ever been all and, they
could have obtained as
much publicity, to justify
their conduct. their
conduct having been so
with that offence.

4.As of him not
the cause - they look
many times and study
in considering how to repeal
it than would have been justified
for the accomplishment
of it.

5. The Act is - As Ministers they
might have applied for
the Repeal or Amendment
of it - but they never
did.

6. The Finance Committee
had approved
it in strong terms - and
censured them for the delay.
They were called
either to allow
their or to
justify it - they did
neither.

7. They propose an
to execute it as
their preferred
- this would not
be justifiable of King's thoughts
is but in

8. Is it worth while to
the public for this difference?

9. Would they have
had to a conduct
so with
duplicity, perfidy and
inhumanity if they
compassed
him and by the
exercise of their lawful
power.

10. Saying a few words
on each occasion in the
way of excuses. is no proof
of bona fides: if it was
the vilest would
a sure for clearing himself
[+] When they all matter of fact by way of exercise, the question is whether they believe in it themselves?


Identifier: | JB/121/013/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 121.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

1-5, 1-6, 1-19

Box

121

Main Headings

Panopticon

Folio number

013

Info in main headings field

Marginal Contents Incapacity Killing no murder Connectg Observs

Image

002

Titles

Incapacity / Killing no murder / Dispensing Power

Category

Marginal summary sheet

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property.

Page Numbering

A10 / F10

Penner

Watermarks

CW 1799

Marginals

Paper Producer

C. Abbit Lees

Corrections

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Produced in Year

1799

Notes public

ID Number

002

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in