JB/121/332/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/121/332/001: Difference between revisions

Jancopes (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Jancopes (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


3 Sept. 8012<lb/><lb/><gap/> W.  N. S. Wales<lb/>B. 7 or 8 Note to <gap/> <gap/><lb/><gap/> <gap/>L Pelham<lb/><lb/>M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Benthams work on L Pelham Letter N<hi rend="superscript">o</hi>    written<lb/>28 Aug. 1802.<lb/><note>Pretended anger<lb/>of J. B.<lb/><gap/> <gap/> anger<lb/>a justification<lb/>of precedent in-<lb/>-juries.</note><lb/><lb/>This <del>is exactly the same</del> <gap/>, about the risk of my<lb/>mind, (a point perfectly immaterial to the business in hand) is<lb/>the only sort of <add>notice <del><gap/></del> that</add> <del>intent</del> unless his Lordship or M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Addington<lb/>or M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Riley Addington <del><gap/></del> have ever been able to bear<lb/>to take of it. <del>On any <gap/> form M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Riley Addington</del><lb/>When <add>on Tuesday 9th of July 1801, after leaving</add> <del>after quitting</del> M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Riley Addington and M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Long together,<lb/>I <del><gap/> had</del> was <add>sitting</add> in M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Vansittart's room, according to the ap-<lb/>-pointment he had made with me, M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Riley Addington, in<lb/><gap/> through the room <gap/> <del><gap/></del> <gap/> <gap/> the <gap/> though<lb/><hi rend="underline">I was angry:</hi> although at that very <del>time</del> moment, <del>with</del> <del><add>the most</add></del> <del><gap/> <gap/></del>,<lb/>I was <add>cool enough to be discussing</add> <del>discussing</del> with M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi>Vansittart a business <del>that bore not</del><lb/>of <del>intricacy</del> of great intricacy, that bore not <gap/><lb/>the smallest reference ot it. This is the recourse of men who+
3 Sept. 8012<lb/><lb/><gap/> W.  N. S. Wales<lb/>B. 7 or 8 Note to <gap/> <gap/><lb/><gap/> <gap/>L Pelham<lb/><lb/>M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Benthams work on L Pelham Letter N<hi rend="superscript">o</hi>    written<lb/>28 Aug. 1802.<lb/><note>Pretended anger<lb/>of J. B.<lb/><gap/> <gap/> anger<lb/>a justification<lb/>of precedent in-<lb/>-juries.</note><lb/><lb/>This <del>is exactly the same</del> <gap/>, about the risk of my<lb/>mind, (a point perfectly immaterial to the business in hand) is<lb/>the only sort of <add>notice <del><gap/></del> that</add> <del>intent</del> unless his Lordship or M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Addington<lb/>or M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Riley Addington <del><gap/></del> have ever been able to bear<lb/>to take of it. <del>On any <gap/> form M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Riley Addington</del><lb/>When <add>on Tuesday 9th of July 1801, after leaving</add> <del>after quitting</del> M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Riley Addington and M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Long together,<lb/>I <del><gap/> had</del> was <add>sitting</add> in M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Vansittart's room, according to the ap-<lb/>-pointment he had made with me, M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Riley Addington, in<lb/><gap/> through the room <gap/> <del><gap/></del> <gap/> <gap/> the <gap/> though<lb/><hi rend="underline">I was angry:</hi> although at that very <del>time</del> moment, <del>with</del> <del><add>the most</add></del> <del><gap/> <gap/></del>,<lb/>I was <add>cool enough to be discussing</add> <del>discussing</del> with M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi>Vansittart a business <del>that bore not</del><lb/>of <del>intricacy</del> of great intricacy, that bore not <gap/><lb/>the smallest reference ot it. This is the recourse of men who+<lb/><note><hi rend="superscript">+</hi>knowing that <add>the</add> part<lb/>they <del>have</del> <add>are</add> taking <del><gap/></del> is<lb/>indefensible, are bent<lb/>upon persevering in it.</note><lb/><del>are running against them in <gap/></del><lb/><!-- an entire line is deleted here --><lb/><del><gap/> <gap/></del> So long as <add>the <del><gap/> <gap/></del> destined victim <gap/> keeps to</add> <del><gap/> <gap/> <gap/></del> the tour of<lb/><gap/>, they take as victim of him at all? When, for the pur-<lb/>-pose of <add>trying the <gap/> of fear upon <gap/> <gap/> to <gap/>.</add> <del>making that <gap/> by fear which is <gap/> <gap/> <gap/></del><lb/><del>in this <gap/> to <gap/>,</del> he <gap/> the time of <gap/>,<lb/><gap/> this makes they <gap/> <del>of time</del> is that he is <hi rend="underline">angry</hi>: and<lb/>thus the hope is that his anger may <del><gap/></del> <add>& will</add> to each apetite<lb/>as to afford (as in M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Palmer's case) a <add>subsequent</add> <gap/> for <del>their</del> <add>the</add><lb/><add>predetermined</add> injustice. <gap/> terrifying the confederacy,<hi rend="superscript">+</hi> I <add>did <gap/></add> <del><gap/></del> to be angry<lb/><note><hi rend="superscript">+</hi>and if possible,<lb/>frightening them into<lb/>the path og probity,</note><lb/>enough, and ever angry enough, <add>and am angry enough and always will be angry enough</add> and they were and are frightened<lb/>accordingly: forgiving them any advantage over<del><gap/></del> me. I do not<lb/>choose to be angry enough, nor will they ever find me so.<lb/><lb/>If on an action <del>if upon an <gap/></del> upon a Contract<lb/><del>th</del> a Judge were <del>to <add>take</add> obvious <gap/></del>from the <gap/> of the <lb/>Council to make the discovery that <del>the <gap/></del> <add>the</add> Council was angry, or<lb/>from the <add>fact of the</add> bringing of the action that the <gap/> was angry, and<lb/>so give judgtment for the defendent, his regard for justice<lb/>could be an exact copy of that which has been<gap/><lb/>now for this year and a half by the Miss<hi rend="superscript">es</hi> Addington and Lord<lb/>Pelham. Whether their <gap/> corruption is to be wasted than by<lb/>my <gap/> anger in the eyes of the public and Parliament, is<lb/>an experiment to be tried.<hi rend="superscript">+</hi><hi rend="superscript">+</hi>Though my anger,<lb/>real or supposed, is<lb/><del>working</del> <add><del><gap/></del> working</add> to the purpose<lb/>that is very far from being<lb/><!-- line deleted --><lb/>the case with the certain<lb/><!-- line deleted --><lb/>they are pleased to <gap/><lb/><!-- line deleted --><lb/>of it. It <gap/> before per-<lb/><!-- line deleted --><lb/>-fectly itself &#x2014; corrupted.<lb/><!-- line deleted --><lb/>Here are <gap/> <gap/><lb/><!-- line deleted --><lb/>by questions &#x2014; now unable<lb/><!-- line deleted --><lb/>to find so <gap/> at the<lb/><!-- line deleted --><lb/><gap/> of <gap/> <gap/><lb/><!-- line deleted --><lb/><!-- line deleted -->in the <del><gap/> and</del> to which distress they and <gap/> for <del><gap/> <gap/> <gap/> and <gap/></del>





Revision as of 17:45, 26 September 2013

'Click Here To Edit

3 Sept. 8012

W. N. S. Wales
B. 7 or 8 Note to
L Pelham

Mr Benthams work on L Pelham Letter No written
28 Aug. 1802.
Pretended anger
of J. B.
anger
a justification
of precedent in-
-juries.


This is exactly the same , about the risk of my
mind, (a point perfectly immaterial to the business in hand) is
the only sort of notice that intent unless his Lordship or Mr Addington
or Mr Riley Addington have ever been able to bear
to take of it. On any form Mr Riley Addington
When on Tuesday 9th of July 1801, after leaving after quitting Mr Riley Addington and Mr Long together,
I had was sitting in Mr Vansittart's room, according to the ap-
-pointment he had made with me, Mr Riley Addington, in
through the room the though
I was angry: although at that very time moment, with the most ,
I was cool enough to be discussing discussing with MrVansittart a business that bore not
of intricacy of great intricacy, that bore not
the smallest reference ot it. This is the recourse of men who+
+knowing that the part
they have are taking is
indefensible, are bent
upon persevering in it.

are running against them in

So long as the destined victim keeps to the tour of
, they take as victim of him at all? When, for the pur-
-pose of trying the of fear upon to . making that by fear which is
in this to , he the time of ,
this makes they of time is that he is angry: and
thus the hope is that his anger may & will to each apetite
as to afford (as in Mr Palmer's case) a subsequent for their the
predetermined injustice. terrifying the confederacy,+ I did to be angry
+and if possible,
frightening them into
the path og probity,

enough, and ever angry enough, and am angry enough and always will be angry enough and they were and are frightened
accordingly: forgiving them any advantage over me. I do not
choose to be angry enough, nor will they ever find me so.

If on an action if upon an upon a Contract
th a Judge were to take obvious from the of the
Council to make the discovery that the the Council was angry, or
from the fact of the bringing of the action that the was angry, and
so give judgtment for the defendent, his regard for justice
could be an exact copy of that which has been
now for this year and a half by the Misses Addington and Lord
Pelham. Whether their corruption is to be wasted than by
my anger in the eyes of the public and Parliament, is
an experiment to be tried.++Though my anger,
real or supposed, is
working working to the purpose
that is very far from being

the case with the certain

they are pleased to

of it. It before per-

-fectly itself — corrupted.

Here are

by questions — now unable

to find so at the

of

in the and to which distress they and for and




Identifier: | JB/121/332/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 121.

Date_1

1802-09-03

Marginal Summary Numbering

Not numbered

Box

121

Main Headings

Panopticon versus New South Wales

Folio number

332

Info in main headings field

Panopticon v N. S. Wales

Image

001

Titles

[[titles::Note to Introductory note / private[?] to Ld Pelham]]

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property.

Page Numbering

Penner

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[monogram] 1800]]

Marginals

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1800

Notes public

ID Number

001

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in