JB/122/514/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/122/514/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<p> ff.7.17 + </add> <add>53</add><lb/>Rate IV. Sir George Paul and the Rev<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Becher's<lb/>Rate, as per Estimate - - - - - - - £251:125: 0<hi rend="superscript">s</hi> : 0<hi rend="superscript">d</hi>.</p> <head>Grounds of this Estimate</head><lb/><p>1.  In his Evidence, delivered to the aforesaid Penitentiary <lb/>Committee " I need not hesitate to say " (says Sir George Paul <hi rend="superscript">+</hi> ) that <lb/><note>+ Penitentiary Committee Report - 31. may 1811. Appendix, p.46.</note><lb/>"the labour of penitentiary prisoners, tajen exclusively, will exceed<lb/>"the cost of their clothing and maintenance, and will probably <lb/>"supply <hi rend="underline">some part</hi> of the <sic>expence</sic> of the <hi rend="underline">Establishment</hi>." </p><p>2.  Supposing it to supply the <hi rend="underline">whole</hi> of that expence, then <lb/>the £12,000 a year in question, would to me have been the whole <lb/>of it net profit, <add> as above</add>.</p> <p>3.  remains to be estimated the <hi rend="underline">expence</hi> of an <hi rend="underline">Establishment</hi>.<lb/>this estimate, M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Becher above mentioned has in his Evidence <lb/>made for me.  I say <hi rend="underline">for me</hi>: since it is with express reference to <lb/> the intended <hi rend="underline">Panopticon</hi> establishment (the establishment here<lb/>in question) that it is <hi rend="underline">declaredly</hi> made.</p><p>4.  After having spoken of it for some length, by the <lb/>description of "the Contract with M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Bentham" to evince "(continues <lb/>he)" that such an agreement does not promise any pecuniary <lb/>"advantages to Government" - Suppose the Governor, Chaplain, <lb/>"and Suregeon of the Penitentiary to receive the same salaries as at <lb/>"Newgate, and allowing for a Secretary with a suitable number <lb/>"of Turnkeys and Taskmasters, the yearly <sic>expence</sic> of such an <lb/>"establishment, apportioned among 1000 prisoners, will be only <lb/>£ " 15 " 0" "besides this (he adds) it is manifest that Penitentiary <lb/>Convicts, under judicial regulations, can scarcely fail to earn <lb/>proportionately more than can be derived from the employment <lb/>of those who <add> are </add> subjected to short periods of imprisonment.</p> <p> <add> 5. <hi rend="underline">Observation</hi>. - </add> </p>
<p> <add>§.7.17 + </add> <add>53</add><lb/>Rate IV. Sir George Paul and the Rev<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Becher's<lb/>Rate, as per Estimate - - - - - - - £251:125: 0<hi rend="superscript">s</hi> : 0<hi rend="superscript">d</hi>.</p> <head>Grounds of this Estimate</head><lb/><p>1.  In his Evidence, delivered to the aforesaid Penitentiary <lb/>Committee " I need not hesitate to say " (says Sir George Paul <hi rend="superscript">+</hi> ) that <lb/><note>+ Penitentiary Committee Report - 31. May 1811. Appendix, p.46.</note><lb/>"the labour of Penitentiary prisoners, taken exclusively, will exceed<lb/>"the cost of their clothing and maintenance, and will probably <lb/>"supply <hi rend="underline">some part</hi> of the <sic>expence</sic> of the <hi rend="underline">Establishment</hi>." </p><p>2.  Supposing it to supply the <hi rend="underline">whole</hi> of that expence, then <lb/>the £12,000 a year in question, would to me have been the whole <lb/>of it net profit, <add> as above</add>.</p> <p>3.  Remains to be estimated the <hi rend="underline">expence</hi> of an <hi rend="underline">Establishment</hi>.<lb/>This estimate, M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Becher above mentioned has in his Evidence <lb/>made for me.  I say <hi rend="underline">for me</hi>: since it is with express reference to <lb/> the intended <hi rend="underline">Panopticon</hi> establishment (the establishment here<lb/>in question) that it is <hi rend="underline">declaredly</hi> made.</p><p>4.  After having spoken of it for some length, by the <lb/>description of "the Contract with M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Bentham" to evince "(continues <lb/>he)" that such an agreement does not promise any pecuniary <lb/>"advantages to Government" - Suppose the Governor, Chaplain, <lb/>"and Surgeon of the Penitentiary to receive the same salaries as at <lb/>"Newgate, and allowing for a Secretary with a suitable number <lb/>"of Turnkeys and Taskmasters, the yearly <sic>expence</sic> of such an <lb/>"establishment, apportioned among 1000 prisoners, will be only <lb/>£1 " 15 " 0" " Besides this (he adds) it is manifest that Penitentiary <lb/>Convicts, under judicious regulations, can scarcely fail to earn <lb/>proportionately more than can be derived from the employment <lb/>of those who <add> are </add> subjected to short periods of imprisonment.</p> <p> <add> 5. <hi rend="underline">Observation</hi>. - </add> </p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 10:52, 28 September 2013

'Click Here To Edit

§.7.17 + 53
Rate IV. Sir George Paul and the Revd Mr Becher's
Rate, as per Estimate - - - - - - - £251:125: 0s : 0d.

Grounds of this Estimate

1. In his Evidence, delivered to the aforesaid Penitentiary
Committee " I need not hesitate to say " (says Sir George Paul + ) that
+ Penitentiary Committee Report - 31. May 1811. Appendix, p.46.
"the labour of Penitentiary prisoners, taken exclusively, will exceed
"the cost of their clothing and maintenance, and will probably
"supply some part of the expence of the Establishment."

2. Supposing it to supply the whole of that expence, then
the £12,000 a year in question, would to me have been the whole
of it net profit, as above.

3. Remains to be estimated the expence of an Establishment.
This estimate, Mr Becher above mentioned has in his Evidence
made for me. I say for me: since it is with express reference to
the intended Panopticon establishment (the establishment here
in question) that it is declaredly made.

4. After having spoken of it for some length, by the
description of "the Contract with Mr Bentham" to evince "(continues
he)" that such an agreement does not promise any pecuniary
"advantages to Government" - Suppose the Governor, Chaplain,
"and Surgeon of the Penitentiary to receive the same salaries as at
"Newgate, and allowing for a Secretary with a suitable number
"of Turnkeys and Taskmasters, the yearly expence of such an
"establishment, apportioned among 1000 prisoners, will be only
£1 " 15 " 0" " Besides this (he adds) it is manifest that Penitentiary
Convicts, under judicious regulations, can scarcely fail to earn
proportionately more than can be derived from the employment
of those who are subjected to short periods of imprisonment.

5. Observation. -



Identifier: | JB/122/514/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 122.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

122

Main Headings

Panopticon

Folio number

514

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

Copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property.

Page Numbering

F53 / F54

Penner

Watermarks

JOHN DICKINSON & Co 1809

Marginals

Paper Producer

A. Levy

Corrections

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Produced in Year

1809

Notes public

ID Number

001

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in