JB/042/019/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/042/019/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
Lauraterry (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>1826. Feb<hi rend="superscript"><hi rend="underline">y</hi></hi>.. 28.<lb/>
Constitutional Code.<lb/>
<note>.1828 Aug 24<lb/>
12 1839. May 19.<lb/>
Ch. XI. Ministers Severally.<lb/>
12 S.2.11. Legislation Minister<lb/>
Rationale</note><lb/>
<del><hi rend="underline"><gap/></hi></del>
</head><lb/>
<lb/>
Art  [<unclear>Dejected.</unclear> <add><gap/></add>] Reasons for the <del>rejection</del> <hi rend="superscript"><add>dropping</add></hi> of<lb/>
amendments in any other than the the proposed symmetrical<lb/>
form.<lb/>
<lb/>
1. In the case where the proposed amendment is<lb/>
the work of a Judge, by whom, as per Ch. XII. <hi rend="underline">Judiciary<lb/>
Collectively,</hi> S.20. <hi rend="underline">Eventually emendative function,</hi><lb/>
indication of a supposed demand for amendment<lb/>
has, in the exercise of such his functions been made,-<lb/>
the task of giving expressions to the amendment, on the<lb/>
supposition of it's being desireable, is placed in hands<lb/>
best situated, for the giving to it the requisite properties<lb/>
of <unclear>clearness,</unclear> correctness, all comprehensiveness,<lb/>
and conciseness; and, on the part of the legislature,<lb/>
much waste of time <add><hi rend="superscript">is</hi></add> saved.<lb/>





Revision as of 13:40, 3 October 2013

Click Here To Edit

1826. Feb<hi rend="underline">y</hi>.. 28.
Constitutional Code.
.1828 Aug 24
12 1839. May 19.
Ch. XI. Ministers Severally.
12 S.2.11. Legislation Minister
Rationale



Art [Dejected. ] Reasons for the rejection dropping of
amendments in any other than the the proposed symmetrical
form.

1. In the case where the proposed amendment is
the work of a Judge, by whom, as per Ch. XII. Judiciary
Collectively,
S.20. Eventually emendative function,
indication of a supposed demand for amendment
has, in the exercise of such his functions been made,-
the task of giving expressions to the amendment, on the
supposition of it's being desireable, is placed in hands
best situated, for the giving to it the requisite properties
of clearness, correctness, all comprehensiveness,
and conciseness; and, on the part of the legislature,
much waste of time is saved.




Identifier: | JB/042/019/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 42.

Date_1

1826-02-28

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

042

Main Headings

constitutional code

Folio number

019

Info in main headings field

constitutional code

Image

001

Titles

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d12 / e12

Penner

john flowerdew colls

Watermarks

j whatman turkey mill 1824

Marginals

Paper Producer

admiral pavel chichagov

Corrections

jeremy bentham; sir john bowring

Paper Produced in Year

1824

Notes public

"used"

ID Number

12942

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in