JB/122/108/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/122/108/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<!-- This page is arranged in four columns --> <p> 30 July 1808<lb/> <head>J.B., Charges against Chief Inspector Whitcomb. Marginal Contents.</head></p><p>1. <lb/>1 Charge 1 - Item 5 <lb/>Item 4 - Expenditure on Workmen's Wages - <lb/> p.1. </p> <p> 2. <lb/> Preliminary Statement <lb/> 1. Antecedent conduct of <lb/> the Account<hi rend="superscript">t</hi> in respect <lb/> of this Item.</p> <p> 3. <lb/> 2. Application made by <lb/> him to the Board respecting<lb/> the mode of <lb/> Proof<lb/>&#x2014;&#x2014;</p> 1 <hi rend="superscript">(a)</hi><lb/> Order of the Items why <lb/>departed from. p. 1 <lb/>&#x2014;&#x2014;</p> 4. <lb/> 3. Application made by <lb/><del>Acct</del>Account<hi rend="superscript">t</hi> to elarn <lb/> the mode of proof<lb/> required. <lb/> p.2. </p><p> 5. <lb/> Conduct of the Ch. Inspector<lb/> 1. He misrepresents the <lb/> Books as if sent in <lb/> as <sic>compleat</sic> <gap/> </p> <p>6. <lb/> 2. Instead of furnishing <lb/> the information prayed <lb/> for, he puts an indirect <lb/>rejection on <lb/>the evidence tendered<lb/> calling in vague <lb/> terms for "other" evidence</p><p> 7.<lb/> 3. of the other evidence<lb/< which lay before him<lb/> he takes no notice.</p> <p> 8 <lb/>Impropriety of <gap/> <lb/> his conduct.  Of what <lb/>was tendered, what was <lb/>admissible he should have <lb/> admitted and called for.<lb/> - What was inadmissible <lb/> he should have pronounced <lb/> such- of his doing neither <lb/> the one nor the other, the <lb/> consequence was incurable <lb/>perplexity. p.3</p><pb/> <p><!-- pointing hand symbol --> <gap/>whether to <lb/> <gap/> to Charge <lb/> information witholden? </p>1<lb/> Preliminary Observations <lb/> = Duty of Board by <lb/>itself or Officers to <lb/> afford to Accountants all necessary information<lb/> unasked - <lb/> much more if asked - </p> &#x2014;</p> <p> Charge 2. <lb/>1 - <lb/>Conduct of the Account<hi rend="superscript">t</hi><lb/> in relation to the Items <lb/> in his Acc<hi rend="superscript">t</hi> - information prayed. <lb/> p.1 </p>2 <lb/> Duty of the Ch. Inspect<hi rend="superscript">r</hi><lb/>thereupon . P.2</p> <p>3. <lb/>His misconduct<lb/> therein<lb/>requisition, involving <lb/> - an insult - </p> <p> 4. <lb/> Sole possible extenuation - <lb/> gross impropriety <lb/>of expression </p> <p> 5. <lb/> Conduct of the Account<hi rend="superscript">t</hi><lb/> Under the perplexity <lb/> thus occasioned - <lb/><gap/> acknowledgment <lb/>sent in. </p> <p> No answers perplexity <lb/> unremoved. p.4. </p> <pb/>Charge 3 <lb/>3. Art.2. Query 3<lb/> 2. Ch. Inspectors <add> requisition of </add> reasons <lb/>for the production of <lb/> 3 Invoices</p> <p> 2 <lb/>This requisition as <lb/> already confirmed to <lb/> the Account<hi rend="superscript">t</hi> tendering proof viz - <lb/>1. by Query as to proof </p> <p> 3 <lb/> 2. by Item 3 noticing <lb/> receipt of cast iron <lb/> by Campbell &amp; White <lb/> p.2</p> <p>4<lb/>Misconduct of the Ch Inspector <lb/> Both lenders left unnoticed <lb/> by <del> Ch Inspector</del> <add> him</add> p.2 </p> <p> Charge 4. <lb/> 4 Query 1. <lb/> 1<lb/> Ch. Inspector's Query 1 - <lb/> Four requisitions <lb/> combined in it - some <lb/> irrelevant - all unnecessary - <lb/> thence improper &amp; <lb/> vexatious. p.1.</p> <p> 2 <lb/> 1 Requis<hi rend="superscript">n</hi> 1 <lb/> Authority for disbursements <lb/> called for. <lb/> p.1. </p> <p> 3 <lb/> The information thus <lb/> called for was already <lb/> before him from 2 <lb/> sources via - <lb/> 1. The King's Warrant itself - <lb/> matter of record - </p> <p> 4 <lb/> 2. Accountants evidence <lb/> to the Finance Commee<lb/> referred to in let. 1. <lb/> accompanying his acct. </p> <pb/><p> <!-- pointing hand symbol --> 1. Conclude with <add> general </add> <gap/> <lb/> of <unclear>information</unclear> in <lb/> the instance of cash <lb/> charge? </p> 2. Observ. a <gap/> <lb/> mode of quoting the <lb/> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <lb/> in <gap/> charges. </p>
<!-- This page is arranged in four columns --> <p> 30 July 1808<lb/> <head>J.B., Charges against Chief Inspector Whitcomb. Marginal Contents.</head></p><p>1. <lb/>1 Charge 1 - Item 5 <lb/>Item 4 - Expenditure <lb/>on Workmen's Wages - <lb/> p.1. </p> <p> 2. <lb/> Preliminary Statement <lb/> 1. Antecedent conduct of <lb/> the Account<hi rend="superscript">t</hi> in respect <lb/> of this Item.</p> <p> 3. <lb/> 2. Application made by <lb/> him to the Board respecting<lb/> the mode of <lb/> Proof<lb/>&#x2014;&#x2014;</p><p> 1 <hi rend="superscript">(a)</hi><lb/> Order of the Items why <lb/>departed from. p. 1 <lb/>&#x2014;&#x2014;</p><p> 4. <lb/> 3. Application made by <lb/><del>Acct</del> Account<hi rend="superscript">t</hi> to learn <lb/> the mode of proof<lb/> required. <lb/> p.2. </p><p> 5. <lb/> Conduct of the Ch. Inspector<lb/> 1. He misrepresents the <lb/> Books as if sent in <lb/> as <sic>compleat</sic> <gap/> </p> <p>6. <lb/> 2. Instead of furnishing <lb/> the information prayed <lb/> for, he puts an indirect <lb/>rejection on <lb/>the evidence tendered<lb/> calling in vague <lb/> terms for "other" evidence</p><p> 7.<lb/> 3. Of the other evidence<lb/> which lay before him<lb/> he takes no notice.</p> <p> 8 <lb/>Impropriety of <unclear>much</unclear> <lb/> his conduct.  Of what <lb/>was tendered, what was <lb/>admissible he should have <lb/> admitted and called for.<lb/> - What was inadmissible <lb/> he should have pronounced <lb/> such- of his doing neither <lb/> the one nor the other, the <lb/> consequence was incurable <lb/>perplexity. p.3</p><pb/> <p><!-- pointing hand symbol --> <gap/> whether to <lb/> postpone to Charge <lb/> information witholden? </p><p>1<lb/> Preliminary Observations <lb/> = Duty of Board by <lb/>itself or Officers to <lb/> afford to Accountants<lb/> all necessary information<lb/> unasked - <lb/> much more if asked - &#x2014;</p> <p> Charge 2. <lb/>1 - <lb/>Conduct of the Account<hi rend="superscript">t</hi><lb/> in relation to the Items <lb/> in his Acc<hi rend="superscript">t</hi> - information prayed. <lb/> p.1 </p><p>2 <lb/> Duty of the Ch. Inspect<hi rend="superscript">r</hi><lb/>thereupon . p.2</p> <p>3. <lb/>His misconduct<lb/> therein<lb/>requisition, involving <lb/> - an insult - </p> <p> 4. <lb/> Sole possible extenuation - <lb/> gross impropriety <lb/>of expression </p> <p> 5. <lb/> Conduct of the Account<hi rend="superscript">t</hi><lb/> Under the perplexity <lb/> thus occasioned - <lb/> Fresh acknowledgment <lb/>sent in. </p> <p>6. <lb/> No answers perplexity <lb/> unremoved. p.4. </p> <pb/><p>Charge 3 <lb/>3. Art.2. Query 3<lb/> 2. Ch. Inspectors <add> requisition of </add> reasons <lb/>for the production of <lb/> 3 Invoices</p> <p> 2 <lb/>This requisition was <lb/> already conformed to <lb/> the Account<hi rend="superscript">t</hi> tendering <lb/>proof viz - <lb/>1. by Query as to proof </p> <p> 3 <lb/> 2. by Item 3 noticing <lb/> receipt of cast iron <lb/> by Campbell &amp; White <lb/> p.2</p> <p>4<lb/>Misconduct of the Ch Inspector <lb/> Both lenders left unnoticed <lb/> by <del> Ch Inspector</del> <add> him</add> p.2 </p> <p> Charge 4. <lb/> 4 Query 1. <lb/> 1<lb/> Ch. Inspector's Query 1 - <lb/> Four requisitions <lb/> combined in it - some <lb/> irrelevant - all unnecessary - <lb/> thence improper &amp; <lb/> vexatious. p.1.</p> <p> 2 <lb/> 1 Requis<hi rend="superscript">n</hi> 1 <lb/> Authority for disbursements <lb/> called for. <lb/> p.1. </p> <p> 3 <lb/> The information thus <lb/> called for was already <lb/> before him from 2 <lb/> sources viz - <lb/> 1. The King's Warrant itself - <lb/> matter of record - </p> <p> 4 <lb/> 2. Accountants evidence <lb/> to the Finance Commee<lb/> referred to in Lett. 1. <lb/> accompanying his Acct. </p> <pb/><!-- pointing hand symbol --> <p>1. Conclude with <add> general </add> <gap/> <lb/> of <unclear>information</unclear> in <lb/> the instance of each <lb/> charge? </p><p> 2. Observ. a <gap/> <lb/> mode of quoting the <lb/> <gap/> comments <gap/> <lb/> in <gap/> charge. </p>




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 09:39, 7 October 2013

'Click Here To Edit

30 July 1808
J.B., Charges against Chief Inspector Whitcomb. Marginal Contents.

1.
1 Charge 1 - Item 5
Item 4 - Expenditure
on Workmen's Wages -
p.1.

2.
Preliminary Statement
1. Antecedent conduct of
the Accountt in respect
of this Item.

3.
2. Application made by
him to the Board respecting
the mode of
Proof
——

1 (a)
Order of the Items why
departed from. p. 1
——

4.
3. Application made by
Acct Accountt to learn
the mode of proof
required.
p.2.

5.
Conduct of the Ch. Inspector
1. He misrepresents the
Books as if sent in
as compleat

6.
2. Instead of furnishing
the information prayed
for, he puts an indirect
rejection on
the evidence tendered
calling in vague
terms for "other" evidence

7.
3. Of the other evidence
which lay before him
he takes no notice.

8
Impropriety of much
his conduct. Of what
was tendered, what was
admissible he should have
admitted and called for.
- What was inadmissible
he should have pronounced
such- of his doing neither
the one nor the other, the
consequence was incurable
perplexity. p.3


---page break---

whether to
postpone to Charge
information witholden?

1
Preliminary Observations
= Duty of Board by
itself or Officers to
afford to Accountants
all necessary information
unasked -
much more if asked - —

Charge 2.
1 -
Conduct of the Accountt
in relation to the Items
in his Acct - information prayed.
p.1

2
Duty of the Ch. Inspectr
thereupon . p.2

3.
His misconduct
therein
requisition, involving
- an insult -

4.
Sole possible extenuation -
gross impropriety
of expression

5.
Conduct of the Accountt
Under the perplexity
thus occasioned -
Fresh acknowledgment
sent in.

6.
No answers perplexity
unremoved. p.4.


---page break---

Charge 3
3. Art.2. Query 3
2. Ch. Inspectors requisition of reasons
for the production of
3 Invoices

2
This requisition was
already conformed to
the Accountt tendering
proof viz -
1. by Query as to proof

3
2. by Item 3 noticing
receipt of cast iron
by Campbell & White
p.2

4
Misconduct of the Ch Inspector
Both lenders left unnoticed
by Ch Inspector him p.2

Charge 4.
4 Query 1.
1
Ch. Inspector's Query 1 -
Four requisitions
combined in it - some
irrelevant - all unnecessary -
thence improper &
vexatious. p.1.

2
1 Requisn 1
Authority for disbursements
called for.
p.1.

3
The information thus
called for was already
before him from 2
sources viz -
1. The King's Warrant itself -
matter of record -

4
2. Accountants evidence
to the Finance Commee
referred to in Lett. 1.
accompanying his Acct.


---page break---

1. Conclude with general
of information in
the instance of each
charge?

2. Observ. a
mode of quoting the
comments
in charge.



Identifier: | JB/122/108/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 122.

Date_1

1808-07-30

Marginal Summary Numbering

1-8, 1, 1-6, 1-4, 1-4

Box

122

Main Headings

Panopticon

Folio number

108

Info in main headings field

JB's Charges against Chief Inspector Whitcombe Marginal Contents

Image

001

Titles

Category

Marginal summary sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property.

Page Numbering

D1

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

001

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in