★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
Auto upload |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<p> <add> 16 July 1808</add><add> + Charge 1 </add> <lb/><note>Charge 1 <lb/> 1. Art. 4 Query 5</note></p> <p> <add> 3 </add> <lb/> <!-- symbol ? --><lb/><!-- indistinct pencil annotation --><note>6 <lb/> 2. <gap/> if <gap/> the information prayed for, he <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <gap> as the evidence <gap/></note><lb/><add>In the same Query,</add> Instead of <del> printing out</del> <add> <del>D</del> distinct terms printing out </add> the mode by which whatever <lb/><unclear>defining</unclear>, <del> according to </del> <add> in </add> his view of the matter the proof laboured<lb/>under, might <del> as if obtain</del> be supplied, the terms <lb/>he used were such as, supposing them designed to <del> effect </del> <add> involve </add> <lb/>the Accountant <del> with <gap/> </del> <add> in irremediable </add> perplexity, were even <unclear>well</unclear> <lb/>adapted to that purpose; but <del> for the perform</del> <add> with respect to any sub purpose as that of <unclear>malling</unclear> <lb/>a <foreign><hi rend="underline">bona fide</hi></foreign> Accountant to obtain his discharge, <lb/>in respect of many <foreign><hi rend="underline">bona fide</hi></foreign> disbursed and applied <lb/>altogether <del> as appli</del> <add> unconducive and even </add> repugnent <del> <gap/></del>. <del> <gap/> <del><add> By <hi rend="underline">infliction</hi> the </add> receipts of <lb/> the proper evidence, and put as an Inspector was <add> warranted </add> <del> entitled</del> <lb/>in expecting: but, it being apparent that in the <lb/>present instance no such evidence was to be had, <lb/>he calls either for that or "<hi rend="underline">other evidence of contract</hi> <lb/>"<hi rend="underline">payment</hi>".<lb/><!-- pencil annotation --><note>7 <lb/> 3. Of the <hi rend="underline">other evidence</hi><lb/> where <gap/> before <lb/> he takes as <gap/> </note></p> <p><add> That in relation to this <gap/> article</add> "other evidence" <del> of actual payment</del> was to be<lb/><add> viz. on being called for <del> had</del> </add> had, he knows already: for <gap/> of it being before him. [+]<lb/><note>[+] what he also knows<lb/> was that the "other evidence"<lb/> was "<hi rend="underline">evidence of actual <lb/>"payment</hi></note><lb/> for <add> in a case like this </add> money can not be <hi rend="underline">received</hi> by one person without <lb/>being <hi rend="underline">paid</hi> to him by another.<lb/><!-- pencil annotation --><note>6<lb/> The propriety of <lb/><gap.> his conduct <lb/> of this <gap/> <gap/> <lb/> what was inadmissible<lb/> he should have admitted <lb/> and called for: <lb/> what was inadmissible<lb/> he should have <gap/> <lb/> such </note></p><p> If in the judgment of M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Chief Inspector this<lb/> reduces this <unclear>trident</unclear> <gap/> <add> with propriety</add> <hi rend="underline"><gap/></hi> so was his duty <lb/><del> to <gap/> <gap/> and to call for it</del> <add> <del> have called</del> </add> <add> to have called for it accordingly <add><del> being called</del></add>to have called for it </add> in such <gap/> as <add> the structure of the <gap/> admitted and </add> the <del> case</del><lb/> required: <add> nature of the case</add> of inadmissible, it was his duty to have <lb/>said so, and on what grounds he required it as inadmissible: <lb/> to the end that the Accountant might either <lb/>maximise the propriety of that evidence, or <unclear>turns</unclear> other <lb/>evidence, or submit to the <unclear>disclosure</unclear> of the article [+]<lb/><note>[+] of this <add> two </add> only proper <add> <del> possible</del> </add> <lb/> courses <del> was con</del> <add> neither </add> was taken<lb/> by M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Chief Inspector:</lb/>the consequence was that <lb/> in respect of this Article <lb/> the Accountant was <del>left</del><lb/>at his <gap/>, left ina <lb/> state of irredemiable <del>perplexity</del> <lb/> <del> and</del> uncertainty <lb/> and perplexity, <del> of </del> <add> to </add> which <lb/><del>at the rate of proceeding <!-- text continues at right angles --> those <gap/ <gap/> <gap/></del> under this mode of proceeding, he can exercise no end </note><!-- illegible pencil comment --></p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | ||
16 July 1808 + Charge 1
Charge 1
1. Art. 4 Query 5
3
6
2. if the information prayed for, he <gap> as the evidence
In the same Query, Instead of printing out D distinct terms printing out the mode by which whatever
defining, according to in his view of the matter the proof laboured
under, might as if obtain be supplied, the terms
he used were such as, supposing them designed to effect involve
the Accountant with in irremediable perplexity, were even well
adapted to that purpose; but for the perform with respect to any sub purpose as that of malling
a bona fide Accountant to obtain his discharge,
in respect of many bona fide disbursed and applied
altogether as appli <add> unconducive and even repugnent . By infliction the receipts of
the proper evidence, and put as an Inspector was warranted entitled
in expecting: but, it being apparent that in the
present instance no such evidence was to be had,
he calls either for that or "other evidence of contract
"payment".
7
3. Of the other evidence
where before
he takes as
That in relation to this article "other evidence" of actual payment was to be
viz. on being called for had had, he knows already: for of it being before him. [+]
[+] what he also knows
was that the "other evidence"
was "evidence of actual
"payment
for in a case like this money can not be received by one person without
being paid to him by another.
6
The propriety of
<gap.> his conduct
of this
what was inadmissible
he should have admitted
and called for:
what was inadmissible
he should have
such
If in the judgment of Mr Chief Inspector this
reduces this trident with propriety so was his duty
to and to call for it have called to have called for it accordingly <add> being calledto have called for it </add> in such as the structure of the admitted and the case
required: nature of the case of inadmissible, it was his duty to have
said so, and on what grounds he required it as inadmissible:
to the end that the Accountant might either
maximise the propriety of that evidence, or turns other
evidence, or submit to the disclosure of the article [+]
[+] of this two only proper possible
courses was con neither was taken
by Mr Chief Inspector:</lb/>the consequence was that
in respect of this Article
the Accountant was left
at his , left ina
state of irredemiable perplexity
and uncertainty
and perplexity, of to which
at the rate of proceeding those <gap/ under this mode of proceeding, he can exercise no end
|
Identifier: | JB/122/115/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 122. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1808-07-16 |
[[marginal_summary_numbering::6-7, 6[?]]] |
||
|
122 |
Panopticon |
||
|
115 |
Charge 1 |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
Text sheet |
1 |
||
|
Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property. |
E3 |
||
|
See note 3 to letter 1986, vol. 7 |
001 |
||
