JB/121/050/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/121/050/001: Difference between revisions

Lea Stern (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Lea Stern (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
<head>§8 Establishment 7</head>
<head>§8 Establishment 7</head>


<p><note>10 <lb/>2. Audience of King <lb/>King refuses to bow <lb/>to the Statute Book <lb/>gives his own "<hi rend="underline">conceptions</hi>" <lb/> &#x2014; promises to receive <lb/>J.B.'s paper of <lb/>Observations &#x2014; <lb/>&#x2014; and not to send <lb/>his letters to the <lb/>Treasury, till <lb/>afterwards</note> <lb/>At my second audience M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> King <del><sic>display'd</sic> <lb/>those <gap/>  unpleasantly had</del> had received sufficient <lb/>instruction to display those principles which <lb/><add>Your Lordship will see</add> <del>aor</del> stamped in such illustrious characters, upon <lb/>a letter of the Duke of Portland. Finding them <lb/>as wide from my own wishes, <add>my purpose</add> as they were from <lb/>the law of the land, I ventured with becoming <lb/><unclear>deference</unclear> to propose, that the latter standard <lb/>should be <del>opened and</del> referred, <add>turned to and consulted</add> then and there, <lb/>for greater certainty. M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> King could not be <lb/>prevailed upon to see either the necessity or the <lb/>use of any such reference. His <del>oft</del> own "conceptions" <lb/>were so and so: he had no objection <lb/>to the repeating them as often as I chose <add>pleased</add> to hear <lb/>them: but as to the looking any farther, it was <lb/>a search that seemed to him <add>presented itself to him</add> altogether useless. <lb/>Finding the conversation growing warm though the <lb/>warmth was altogether <add>solely</add> on one side, <del>I tho</del> it <lb/> seemed to me that no good <add>no further good</add> could result from <lb/>the continuation of it. It had been suggested to <lb/> me as a point of prudence not to <del>open</del> <add>risk</add> <lb/><del>myself to any <gap/></del> by any unnecessary <lb/> opposition <del>to the <add>his</add> resistance</del> the exerting any <lb/> <note>I had heard him <lb/>spoken of as one <lb/>who understood <lb/>being angry, and <lb/>who was not <add>at least as</add> unready <lb/>at that as at any <lb/>thing else.</note> <lb/>
<p><note>10 <lb/>2. Audience of King <lb/>King refuses to bow <lb/>to the Statute Book <lb/>gives his own "<hi rend="underline">conceptions</hi>" <lb/> &#x2014; promises to receive <lb/>J.B.'s paper of <lb/>Observations &#x2014; <lb/>&#x2014; and not to send <lb/>his letters to the <lb/>Treasury, till <lb/>afterwards</note> <lb/>At my second audience M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> King <del><sic>display'd</sic> <lb/>those <gap/>  unpleasantly had</del> had received sufficient <lb/>instruction to display those principles which <lb/><add>Your Lordship will see</add> <del>aor</del> stamped in such illustrious characters, upon <lb/>a letter of the Duke of Portland. Finding them <lb/>as wide from my own wishes, <add>my purpose</add> as they were from <lb/>the law of the land, I ventured with becoming <lb/><unclear>deference</unclear> to propose, that the latter standard <lb/>should be <del>opened and</del> referred, <add>turned to and consulted</add> then and there, <lb/>for greater certainty. M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> King could not be <lb/>prevailed upon to see either the necessity or the <lb/>use of any such reference. His <del>oft</del> own "conceptions" <lb/>were so and so: he had no objection <lb/>to the repeating them as often as I chose <add>pleased</add> to hear <lb/>them: but as to the looking any farther, it was <lb/>a search that seemed to him <add>presented itself to him</add> altogether useless. <lb/>Finding the conversation growing warm though the <lb/>warmth was altogether <add>solely</add> on one side, <del>I tho</del> it <lb/> seemed to me that no good <add>no further good</add> could result from <lb/>the continuation of it. It had been suggested to <lb/> me as a point of prudence not to <del>open</del> <add>risk</add> <lb/><del>myself to any <gap/></del> by any unnecessary <lb/> opposition <del>to the <add>his</add> resistance</del> the exerting any <lb/> <note>I had heard him <lb/>spoken of as one <lb/>who understood <lb/>being angry, and <lb/>who was not <add>at least as</add> unready <lb/>at that as at any <lb/>thing else.</note> <lb/>sentiment of displeasure on the part of a gentleman <lb/>on whose complacency I had so much at stake <lb/>lest the effect of it should <add>harm should come from it</add> become sensible to me. <lb/>I had already known from him that his engagement <lb/>did not <sic>admitt</sic> of a full description at that time. I <lb/>
 
<add>took</add>
 
</p>
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 23:18, 16 October 2013

'Click Here To Edit

19 Feby 1802 After F8 15 Connect Observ §8 Establishment 7

10
2. Audience of King
King refuses to bow
to the Statute Book
gives his own "conceptions"
— promises to receive
J.B.'s paper of
Observations —
— and not to send
his letters to the
Treasury, till
afterwards

At my second audience Mr King display'd
those unpleasantly had
had received sufficient
instruction to display those principles which
Your Lordship will see aor stamped in such illustrious characters, upon
a letter of the Duke of Portland. Finding them
as wide from my own wishes, my purpose as they were from
the law of the land, I ventured with becoming
deference to propose, that the latter standard
should be opened and referred, turned to and consulted then and there,
for greater certainty. Mr King could not be
prevailed upon to see either the necessity or the
use of any such reference. His oft own "conceptions"
were so and so: he had no objection
to the repeating them as often as I chose pleased to hear
them: but as to the looking any farther, it was
a search that seemed to him presented itself to him altogether useless.
Finding the conversation growing warm though the
warmth was altogether solely on one side, I tho it
seemed to me that no good no further good could result from
the continuation of it. It had been suggested to
me as a point of prudence not to open risk
myself to any by any unnecessary
opposition to the his resistance the exerting any
I had heard him
spoken of as one
who understood
being angry, and
who was not at least as unready
at that as at any
thing else.

sentiment of displeasure on the part of a gentleman
on whose complacency I had so much at stake
lest the effect of it should harm should come from it become sensible to me.
I had already known from him that his engagement
did not admitt of a full description at that time. I
took



Identifier: | JB/121/050/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 121.

Date_1

1802-02-19

Marginal Summary Numbering

10

Box

121

Main Headings

Panopticon

Folio number

050

Info in main headings field

Establishment

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property.

Page Numbering

D15 / E7

Penner

Watermarks

1800

Marginals

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1800

Notes public

ID Number

001

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in