★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
Auto upload |
No edit summary |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
'' | <p> <add>18 July 1808</add> <add>+ Charge 7 </add><lb/><note>Charge 7 <lb/>4 Query 1<lb/>Requisition 4<lb/>Observation <lb/> 6<lb/>3. Vexation that might <lb/>have resulted from <lb/>had the irrelevant<lb/>documents thus <lb/> called <lb/> for been <gap/></note></p><p> <add> (del>6</del>7) 12<lb/><del> For <gap/> <gap/> about through it </del> Among the effect effects <lb/>these <gap/> irrelevant and unwarrantable requisitions <del> around which </del> <Add> which <lb/>tended to produce there is one which through <del> not produced</del> by the Accountant <lb/><gap/> prevented from being produced, is of two <gap/> &nature<lb/> <add> to <gap/> be proffered altogether without notice.</add> <lb/><del><gap/> it be in the <gap/> items of the effects it might </del><lb/><del> been had in relation to probate, or <gap/> <gap/> to <del/> <lb/><gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> effect <gap/> <gap/> which <gap/> </del> <lb/><del> in contemplation or not in contemplation of Mr Chief <lb/><del> Inspector, would equally have been <gap/> from a compliance</del> <lb/><del>with there has irrelevant and unwarrantable requisition</del> </p> <p><del> By </del> <add> In and by </add> a letter <del> about </del> <add> <gap> </add> dates the 14<hi rend="superscript">th</hi> of this month <add> July </add> addressed <note>24 July 1808</note><lb/>by M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> <unclear>Walls</unclear> in his character of Secretary to the Audit Office at the Adelphi<lb/>to this Accountant, and received by this Accountant on <lb/>the next day, <add> 15th July it is stated as from the Commissioners as</add> ,del> it appears that when as</del> being unusual,<note>25 July 1808</note><lb/>"and contrary to the rules of this Office, to part with <lb/> "my Vouchers that have been delivered in support of <lb/>"an account."</p><p>In and by the terms of the said <add> Mr Chief Inspector's </add> fourth requisition of <lb/>the <add> first</add> Query <del> a</del> <del> I was </del> <add> the Accountant is </add> called upon "to <sic>transmitt</sic> to this <lb/>"office" (from which <add> he (Mr Accountant) </add> presumes they would have passed <add> of course</add> into <lb/>his <add> Mr Chief Inspector's) </add> hands) <hi rend="underline">the originals so</hi> authenticated copies of <lb/>any letters or communication he "(the Accountant) may <lb/>"have received from the Treasury on the subject." By <lb/><del> sending transmit taking </del> <add> causing to be taken </add> <hi rend="underline">authenticated copies</hi> <add> for the purpose of transmitting them </add> the Accountant <lb/>would have been <add> subjected</add> <del>put</del> <add><del><gap>/del> </add> not only to considerable <lb/>expense, but <add> to very </add> considerable trouble. By transmitting the originals <lb/>without <gap/> or taking any such <gap/>, he would <add> have </add> served <lb/>not only the which of the expense but a considerable part <lb/>of the trouble. <del> If the </del> Whether the original <del><gap/></del> <add> <gap/> </add> in <gap/> <lb/>optimal terms called for would, had they been <del> called </del> <lb/>transmitted, have been deemed "<hi rend="underline">Vouchers delivered in</hi><lb/>"<hi rend="underline">support of an Account</hi>, this Accountant can not <lb/>take upon him to pronounce: it is a point <add> the determination <gap/> (he presumes)<del> that </del> risk with <add> late </del> <lb/>the authority in which this rule originated. </p> | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} |
18 July 1808 + Charge 7
Charge 7
4 Query 1
Requisition 4
Observation
6
3. Vexation that might
have resulted from
had the irrelevant
documents thus
called
for been
(del>67) 12
For about through it Among the effect effects
these irrelevant and unwarrantable requisitions around which <Add> which
tended to produce there is one which through not produced by the Accountant
prevented from being produced, is of two &nature
<add> to be proffered altogether without notice.
it be in the items of the effects it might
been had in relation to probate, or to
effect which
in contemplation or not in contemplation of Mr Chief Inspector, would equally have been from a compliance
with there has irrelevant and unwarrantable requisition
By In and by a letter about <gap> dates the 14th of this month July addressed 24 July 1808
by Mr Walls in his character of Secretary to the Audit Office at the Adelphi
to this Accountant, and received by this Accountant on
the next day, 15th July it is stated as from the Commissioners as ,del> it appears that when as being unusual,25 July 1808
"and contrary to the rules of this Office, to part with
"my Vouchers that have been delivered in support of
"an account."
In and by the terms of the said Mr Chief Inspector's fourth requisition of
the first Query a I was the Accountant is called upon "to transmitt to this
"office" (from which he (Mr Accountant) presumes they would have passed of course into
his Mr Chief Inspector's) hands) the originals so authenticated copies of
any letters or communication he "(the Accountant) may
"have received from the Treasury on the subject." By
sending transmit taking causing to be taken authenticated copies for the purpose of transmitting them the Accountant
would have been subjected put <gap>/del> not only to considerable
expense, but to very considerable trouble. By transmitting the originals
without or taking any such , he would have served
not only the which of the expense but a considerable part
of the trouble. If the Whether the original in
optimal terms called for would, had they been called
transmitted, have been deemed "Vouchers delivered in
"support of an Account, this Accountant can not
take upon him to pronounce: it is a point <add> the determination (he presumes) that risk with <add> late
the authority in which this rule originated.
Identifier: | JB/122/133/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 122. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1808-07-18 |
6 |
||
122 |
Panopticon |
||
133 |
Charge 7 |
||
001 |
|||
Text sheet |
1 |
||
Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property. |
C7 / E12 |
||
See note 3 to letter 1986, vol. 7 |
001 |
||