★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
<p><note>7 <lb/>An army might <lb/>soon be brought <lb/>within the kingdom</note> The objection grounded in the confined import of the <lb/>word <hi rend="underline">kingdom</hi> is scarce deserving of much notice. An <lb/>army collected in a Colony out of the kingdom (if the <lb/>Colonies themselves are not included to this purpose in the <lb/>import of the word kingdom — might be brought within it<lb/> in a few weeks). </p> | <p><note>7 <lb/>An army might <lb/>soon be brought <lb/>within the kingdom</note> The objection grounded in the confined import of the <lb/>word <hi rend="underline">kingdom</hi> is scarce deserving of much notice. An <lb/>army collected in a Colony out of the kingdom (if the <lb/>Colonies themselves are not included to this purpose in the <lb/>import of the word kingdom — might be brought within it<lb/> in a few weeks). </p> | ||
<p><note>8 <lb/>G. Grenville according <lb/>to E. <unclear>Burton</unclear> maintained <lb/>that it was <lb/>illegal for <del>Colonies</del> <add>the Convict</add> <lb/>to accept of money from <lb/><add>the Colonies</add> even <gap/> their <lb/><gap/> government.</note> The <del>intro</del> application thus made of the principles <lb/>of the Bill of Rights to the case of Colonies is not a <lb/>new one. A similar one we learn from Edmund <lb/>Burke was much dwelt on by George Grenville: Grenville <lb/>who before he was a Minister was a lawyer and <lb/><del>to whom it had <add>been</add> so often objected</del> who had been so <lb/>severely attacked by his eloquent adversary for his <lb/>supposed bigotry <add>attachment</add> to the <del>prejudices</del> profession with all <lb/>the prejudices <add>and infirmities ascribed</add> belonging to it. | <p><note>8 <lb/>G. Grenville according <lb/>to E. <unclear>Burton</unclear> maintained <lb/>that it was <lb/>illegal for <del>Colonies</del> <add>the Convict</add> <lb/>to accept of money from <lb/><add>the Colonies</add> even <gap/> their <lb/><gap/> government.</note> The <del>intro</del> application thus made of the principles <lb/>of the Bill of Rights to the case of Colonies is not a <lb/>new one. A similar one we learn from Edmund <lb/>Burke was much dwelt on by George Grenville: Grenville <lb/>who before he was a Minister was a lawyer and <lb/><del>to whom it had <add>been</add> so often objected</del> who had been so <lb/>severely attacked by his eloquent adversary for his <lb/>supposed bigotry <add>attachment</add> to the <del>prejudices</del> profession with all <lb/>the prejudices <add>and infirmities ascribed</add> belonging to it. He (M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Grenville) says <lb/>Burke in his speech on American taxation) <hi rend="superscript">+</hi> <note><hi rend="superscript">+</hi> <gap/> April 19 1774 <lb/>3<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> edit. 1775. p. 54</note> "was of opinion, <lb/>"which he has declared in this House a hundred <lb/>"times, that the Colonies could not legally grant any <lb/>"revenue to the Crown; and that infinite mischiefs would be <lb/>"the consequence of such a power." </p> | ||
25 July 1802 N. S. Wales Conduct 3
in non-uniform period country to depend upon? Monopolies Produce of Monopolies
offices, privileges of all sorts: by these and a thousand
other devices a f seems standing fund might be established
applicable to the influencing of elections, influencing of
members when elected, and a thousand other anti-
purposes.
7
An army might
soon be brought
within the kingdom The objection grounded in the confined import of the
word kingdom is scarce deserving of much notice. An
army collected in a Colony out of the kingdom (if the
Colonies themselves are not included to this purpose in the
import of the word kingdom — might be brought within it
in a few weeks).
8
G. Grenville according
to E. Burton maintained
that it was
illegal for Colonies the Convict
to accept of money from
the Colonies even their
government. The intro application thus made of the principles
of the Bill of Rights to the case of Colonies is not a
new one. A similar one we learn from Edmund
Burke was much dwelt on by George Grenville: Grenville
who before he was a Minister was a lawyer and
to whom it had been so often objected who had been so
severely attacked by his eloquent adversary for his
supposed bigotry attachment to the prejudices profession with all
the prejudices and infirmities ascribed belonging to it. He (Mr Grenville) says
Burke in his speech on American taxation) + + April 19 1774
3d edit. 1775. p. 54 "was of opinion,
"which he has declared in this House a hundred
"times, that the Colonies could not legally grant any
"revenue to the Crown; and that infinite mischiefs would be
"the consequence of such a power."
|
Identifier: | JB/116/155/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 116. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1802-07-25 |
7-8 |
||
|
116 |
panopticon versus new south wales |
||
|
155 |
n. s. wales |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
e3 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
|||
|
37688 |
|||
