JB/107/233/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/107/233/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
Two other objects which on this same occasion appear<lb/>
 
to have been <add>stood</add> confounded in his mind are the same<lb/>
 
two objects which at the outset <del>he</del> it had been necessary<lb/>
for him to distinguish and which at that period he<lb/>
accordingly did not distinguish <del>.viz</del>. the two parts of <add><unclear>antagonizing</unclear> parts (I mean)</add><lb/>
which his <del><gap/></del> considered his supposed system of "<hi rend="underline"><gap/></hi>"<lb/>
as composed, viz. the "<unclear>Laws</unclear>" themselves viz.
the <hi rend="underline">statutes</hi><lb/>
themselves, and the mode in which they  were administered:<lb/> <add>administered</add> i.e. in nine instances out of ten, defeated<lb/>
by those when provision, <add>according to the constitution</add> it was and is to execute<lb/>
them. Here then two<add>Here in <add>the</add><add>conclusion</add> two objects at first so carefully<lb/>
distinguished, become confounded: the quality of <hi rend="underline">"<unclear>Comity</unclear>"</hi>  <lb/>
which if ascribable to <del><gap/></del> either part of the system<lb/>
will<add>is</add> be ascribable to the administration, i.e. to<lb/> 
the <hi rend="underline">non-execution</hi> of these "<hi rend="underline">sanguinary</hi>" laws, is ascribabed<lb/>
by him to these sanguinary laws themselves:


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 15:00, 9 November 2013

Click Here To Edit

Two other objects which on this same occasion appear
to have been stood confounded in his mind are the same
two objects which at the outset he it had been necessary
for him to distinguish and which at that period he
accordingly did not distinguish .viz. the two parts of antagonizing parts (I mean)
which his considered his supposed system of ""
as composed, viz. the "Laws" themselves viz. the statutes
themselves, and the mode in which they were administered:
administered i.e. in nine instances out of ten, defeated
by those when provision, according to the constitution it was and is to execute
them. Here then twoHere in <add>theconclusion two objects at first so carefully
distinguished, become confounded: the quality of "Comity"
which if ascribable to either part of the system
willis be ascribable to the administration, i.e. to
the non-execution of these "sanguinary" laws, is ascribabed
by him to these sanguinary laws themselves:



Identifier: | JB/107/233/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 107.

Date_1

1809-01-30

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

107

Main Headings

law versus arbitrary power (a hatchet for dr paley's net)

Folio number

233

Info in main headings field

peines

Image

001

Titles

note (a) ?

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e32

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

"quere whether to insert this sheet?"

ID Number

35224

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in