★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
11 Apr. 1802 <gap/><lb/>4<lb/><head>Dispensing powers</head><lb/><note> | 11 Apr. 1802 <gap/><lb/>4<lb/><head>Dispensing powers</head><lb/><note>Excuses<lb/>3. Crime unnecessary</note><lb/>Thus much as to the simple relinquishment of<lb/>the Penitentiary <add>system.</add> business. But for the Duke's (favour.<lb/><note>4*<lb/>A <gap/> for<lb/>the Gaol measure<lb/>would have been<lb/>still more hopeless.<lb/>The objection would<lb/>have been as above<lb/>with the additional<lb/>ones from the ab-<lb/>-surdity of the mea-<lb/>-sure.</note><lb/><gap/>. his own] (favorite) measure about the<lb/>Gaols — that measure to which he has <del>delar</del> de-<lb/>-clared his support without and against the authority<lb/>of Parliament. Your Lordship <gap/> how much<lb/>more hopeless <del>still it could not but have</del> <add><del>appeared</del></add> <del>been, than</del><lb/><del>the others</del> the task it must have appeared in this<lb/>case than in the other, to have established the same<lb/>measure by authority <add>from</add> of Parliament.<lb/><lb/><del><gap/></del> <hi rend="underline">The <gap/> system</hi> (he would have had<lb/>to say) is not a good one: and <gap/> thus far<lb/>he need not have been much in fear of gain-<lb/>-sayers. But then he would have had to say<lb/><hi rend="underline">I want a substitute <add><gap/></add> for it</hi>: <hi rend="underline">I propose this</hi> <lb/><hi rend="underline">Gaol system of mine for that purpose.</hi> — <hi rend="underline">A</hi><lb/><add><gap/></add> <hi rend="underline">substitute?</hi> would some voice or other have cried out<lb/>immediately — <hi rend="underline">why - have not you got one?</hi><lb/><del>got one</del> — <hi rend="underline">got one from Parliament already!</hi><lb/><hi rend="underline">The plan you now stand in, is it not the plan of</hi><lb/><hi rend="underline">M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> <hi rend="underline">Dundas? Did not he,</hi> <del>years ago,</del> <hi rend="underline">with M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi><lb/><hi rend="underline">Pitt, <add>at his elbow,</add> assisting and assenting, <add>at his elbow,</add> come to Parliament with</hi><lb/><hi rend="underline">a <gap/>, years ago, and obtain it? <gap/></hi><lb/><hi rend="underline">is become of it then? Is it established? if not,</hi><lb/><hi rend="underline">why not?</hi> — The answers to these questions would<lb/>have <add>been encompassed with</add> involved the same difficulties as those which<lb/>have just been noticed as not easy to be encountered and | ||
11 Apr. 1802
4
Dispensing powers
Excuses
3. Crime unnecessary
Thus much as to the simple relinquishment of
the Penitentiary system. business. But for the Duke's (favour.
4*
A for
the Gaol measure
would have been
still more hopeless.
The objection would
have been as above
with the additional
ones from the ab-
-surdity of the mea-
-sure.
. his own] (favorite) measure about the
Gaols — that measure to which he has delar de-
-clared his support without and against the authority
of Parliament. Your Lordship how much
more hopeless still it could not but have appeared been, than
the others the task it must have appeared in this
case than in the other, to have established the same
measure by authority from of Parliament.
The system (he would have had
to say) is not a good one: and thus far
he need not have been much in fear of gain-
-sayers. But then he would have had to say
I want a substitute for it: I propose this
Gaol system of mine for that purpose. — A
substitute? would some voice or other have cried out
immediately — why - have not you got one?
got one — got one from Parliament already!
The plan you now stand in, is it not the plan of
M<hi rend="superscript">r Dundas? Did not he, years ago, with M<hi rend="superscript">r
Pitt, at his elbow, assisting and assenting, at his elbow, come to Parliament with
a , years ago, and obtain it?
is become of it then? Is it established? if not,
why not? — The answers to these questions would
have been encompassed with involved the same difficulties as those which
have just been noticed as not easy to be encountered and
|
Identifier: | JB/121/379/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 121. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1802-04-11 |
4* |
||
|
121 |
Panopticon |
||
|
379 |
Dispensing power |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
Text sheet |
1 |
||
|
Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property. |
D4 |
||
|
[[notes_public::Postpone [note in Bentham's hand]]] |
001 |
||
