JB/122/306/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/122/306/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<p> <add> 13 Aug. 1808 </add> <add> + </add> <add> 6 </add> <lb/><note>Arrangements Suggested<lb/> II. Refund not Vouchers</note></p> <p><add> 4 </add> <lb/> <del> On</del> <add> In all </add> former <del> occasions</del> <add> instances </add> <del> having </del> the letters <del> that </del> dated <lb/>from that Office having come to me with the signature<lb/>of a determinate person, in the character of <unclear>Secretary</unclear><lb/>to that Office, my answers had been of course<lb/>directed to <add> be that Office indeed, but <del> <gap/> </del> in particular to that </add> the same <del> genl</del> gentleman, mentioning<lb/>at any rate his name, <add> as also, </add> if I <sic>misrecollect</sic> not, <lb/>his <sic>stile</sic> of Office.  In this same Letter <del> conv</del> <lb/>(the Letter above quoted) signed by the same gentleman, <lb/>comes a Postscript in these words. P.S. <lb/>"Please to direct your answer to the Commissioners <lb/>"of Audit." </p> <p> <del> With </del> <add> On </add> this intimation, <add> polite as it was </add> <del> notwithstanding the <add> its </add> <gap/> <gap/> </del> <lb/><del> of the terms <add> in its form </add> in which it was counted</del> I was <del> <gap/> </del> <add> perverse </add> <lb/>enough, <add> I must confess </add> not to bestow a literal compliance.</p> <p> To <hi rend="underline">me,</hi> these Commissioners, supposing them to exist, were <lb/> and still continue so many <foreign><unclear><hi rend="underline">intes ratianes</hi></unclear></foreign>.  Even <lb/>though I <add> had been </add> <del> were</del> satisfied of their existence, a direction<lb/>so worded, would not <sic>wilingly,</sic> especially after the experience<lb/>I have had, found its way from my pen. <lb/>Opening a letter is the act of some one person.  By <lb/> four pair of hands, in conjunction, (supposing for <lb/>example four Commissioners) it did not seem likely <lb/>to me that <add> any </add> such communication as I had to <lb/>make, would be opened.  It would be opened - by <del> On</del> <lb/>somebody else, by any body, <add><del> as it were </del> by this or that person as it might happen, </add> by nobody knows who - <lb/>in such manner that nobody would be responsible for <lb/>it, or for any such paper as might happen to be <lb/><sic>inclosed</sic> with it.</p?>
<p> <add> 13 Aug. 1808 </add> <add> + </add> <add> 6 </add> <lb/><note>Arrangements Suggested<lb/> II. Refund not Vouchers</note></p> <p><add> 4 </add> <lb/> <del> On</del> <add> In all </add> former <del> occasions</del> <add> instances </add> <del> having </del> the letters <del> that </del> dated <lb/>from that Office having come to me with the signature<lb/>of a determinate person, in the character of Secretary<lb/>to that Office, my answers had been of course<lb/>directed to <add> be that Office indeed, but <del> <gap/> </del> in particular to that </add> the same <del> genl</del> gentleman, mentioning<lb/>at any rate his name, <add> as also, </add> if I <sic>misrecollect</sic> not, <lb/>his <sic>stile</sic> of Office.  In this same Letter <del> conv</del> <lb/>(the Letter above quoted) signed by the same gentleman, <lb/>comes a Postscript in these words. P.S. <lb/>"Please to direct your answer to the Commissioners <lb/>"of Audit." </p>  
 
<p> <del> With </del> <add> On </add> this intimation, <add> polite as it was </add> <del> notwithstanding the <add> its </add> politeness </del> <lb/><del> of the terms <add> in its form </add> in which it was counted</del> I was <del> <gap/> </del> <add> perverse </add> <lb/>enough, <add> I must confess </add> not to bestow a literal compliance.</p>  
 
<p> To <hi rend="underline">me,</hi> these Commissioners, supposing them to exist, were <lb/> and still continue so many <foreign><unclear><hi rend="underline">intes ratianes</hi></unclear></foreign>.  Even <lb/>though I <add> had been </add> <del> were</del> satisfied of their existence, a direction<lb/>so worded, would not <sic>wilingly,</sic> especially after the experience<lb/>I have had, found its way from my pen. <lb/>Opening a letter is the act of some one person.  By <lb/> four pair of hands, in conjunction, (supposing for <lb/>example four Commissioners) it did not seem likely <lb/>to me that <add> any </add> such communication as I had to <lb/>make, would be opened.  It would be opened - by <del> On</del> <lb/>somebody else, by any body, <add><del> as it were </del> by this or that person as it might happen, </add> by nobody knows who - <lb/>in such manner that nobody would be responsible for <lb/>it, or for any such paper as might happen to be <lb/><sic>inclosed</sic> with it.</p>




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 10:58, 20 November 2013

'Click Here To Edit

13 Aug. 1808 + 6
Arrangements Suggested
II. Refund not Vouchers

4
On In all former occasions instances having the letters that dated
from that Office having come to me with the signature
of a determinate person, in the character of Secretary
to that Office, my answers had been of course
directed to be that Office indeed, but in particular to that the same genl gentleman, mentioning
at any rate his name, as also, if I misrecollect not,
his stile of Office. In this same Letter conv
(the Letter above quoted) signed by the same gentleman,
comes a Postscript in these words. P.S.
"Please to direct your answer to the Commissioners
"of Audit."

With On this intimation, polite as it was notwithstanding the its politeness
of the terms in its form in which it was counted I was perverse
enough, I must confess not to bestow a literal compliance.

To me, these Commissioners, supposing them to exist, were
and still continue so many intes ratianes. Even
though I had been were satisfied of their existence, a direction
so worded, would not wilingly, especially after the experience
I have had, found its way from my pen.
Opening a letter is the act of some one person. By
four pair of hands, in conjunction, (supposing for
example four Commissioners) it did not seem likely
to me that any such communication as I had to
make, would be opened. It would be opened - by On
somebody else, by any body, as it were by this or that person as it might happen, by nobody knows who -
in such manner that nobody would be responsible for
it, or for any such paper as might happen to be
inclosed with it.



Identifier: | JB/122/306/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 122.

Date_1

1808-08-13

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

122

Main Headings

Panopticon

Folio number

306

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property.

Page Numbering

D6 / E4

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

001

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in