★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
42<lb/><lb/><head>§. 7. Rates of profit in pari materia</head><lb/>This deducted, as not belonging to the present purpose, remains<lb/>for the total Cost of the Prison <hi rend="underline">this</hi> Year, Officers Salaries excepted<lb/><hi rend="superscript">D</hi>20/23. <hi rend="superscript">C:</hi> 66<lb/>Add Total Expence of Officers Salaries, as per pages 23, 25, 28 & 28<lb/>in the Account given of the prison for the last preceding year,<lb/>as above . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,025.00<lb/>Hence Total of Expence . . . . . . . . . . . .26,748.66<lb/><lb/>From this Total of Expence deduct net profit as above<lb/>remains balance on the side of Expence . . . . 5874.23<lb/><lb/>In this account, as in the <hi rend="underline">first</hi> mentioned of these illustrative<lb/>Accounts, to apply the <hi rend="underline">data</hi> to the Case of the Claimants<lb/>intended prison. —<lb/><lb/>Here again, had the receipts been exactly equal to the<lb/>Expences, the same equality being supposed to have place in the<lb/>Case of the Claimants Prison, N<hi rend="superscript">o</hi>. of Prisoners 1000, the allowance<lb/>made to him for that number, viz! at £12 a head, would have<lb/>been, the whole of it, so much net profit. —<lb/><lb/>But, instead of being equal i.e. each of them to the other<lb/>as 26,748.66 to 26,748..66 — the receipts are to the Expences<lb/>but as 21,874.43 to 26,748.66, the Expences to the Receipts but<lb/>as these two sums <hi rend="underline"><sic>inverseley</sic></hi>; therefore as 26,748..66 is to<lb/>21,874.43 so is £12,000 to the number <hi rend="underline">sought</hi>, being the<lb/>number expressive of the Annual Quantity of net profit,<lb/>which, at this rate, would have accrued to the Claimant<lb/>in his Quality of Manager, contracting on the above terms<lb/>viz . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . £9814.0.0<lb/>Multiplied by the Common Multiplier 24 1/2, expressive of the<lb/>number of Years, this gives for the compensation money due,<lb/>according to this rate . . . . . . . . . . £240,418.0.0<lb/><lb/>In the report of thi same Year, 1802, in an Account<lb/>printed on the back of p. 3 the following are among<lb/>the Statements, made in relation to the Number of the<lb/>prisoners. —<lb/>1. Remaining in prison on 12<hi rend="superscript">th</hi> month (ie 31 Dec.) 1801 — 345<lb/>2 Remaining in prison on 12<hi rend="superscript">th</hi> month (ie 31 Dec.) 1802 - 404 | 42<lb/><lb/><head>§. 7. Rates of profit in pari materia</head><lb/>This deducted, as not belonging to the present purpose, remains<lb/>for the total Cost of the Prison <hi rend="underline">this</hi> Year, Officers Salaries excepted<lb/><hi rend="superscript">D</hi>20/23. <hi rend="superscript">C:</hi> 66<lb/>Add Total Expence of Officers Salaries, as per pages 23, 25, 28 & 28<lb/>in the Account given of the prison for the last preceding year,<lb/>as above . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,025.00<lb/>Hence Total of Expence . . . . . . . . . . . .26,748.66<lb/><lb/>From this Total of Expence deduct net profit as above<lb/>remains balance on the side of Expence . . . . 5874.23<lb/><lb/>In this account, as in the <hi rend="underline">first</hi> mentioned of these illustrative<lb/>Accounts, to apply the <hi rend="underline">data</hi> to the Case of the Claimants<lb/>intended prison. —<lb/><lb/>Here again, had the receipts been exactly equal to the<lb/>Expences, the same equality being supposed to have place in the<lb/>Case of the Claimants Prison, N<hi rend="superscript">o</hi>. of Prisoners 1000, the allowance<lb/>made to him for that number, viz! at £12 a head, would have<lb/>been, the whole of it, so much net profit. —<lb/><lb/>But, instead of being equal i.e. each of them to the other<lb/>as 26,748.66 to 26,748..66 — the receipts are to the Expences<lb/>but as 21,874.43 to 26,748.66, the Expences to the Receipts but<lb/>as these two sums <hi rend="underline"><sic>inverseley</sic></hi>; therefore as 26,748..66 is to<lb/>21,874.43 so is £12,000 to the number <hi rend="underline">sought</hi>, being the<lb/>number expressive of the Annual Quantity of net profit,<lb/>which, at this rate, would have accrued to the Claimant<lb/>in his Quality of Manager, contracting on the above terms<lb/>viz . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . £9814.0.0<lb/>Multiplied by the Common Multiplier 24 1/2, expressive of the<lb/>number of Years, this gives for the compensation money due,<lb/>according to this rate . . . . . . . . . . £240,418.0.0<lb/><lb/>In the report of thi same Year, 1802, in an Account<lb/>printed on the back of p. 3 the following are among<lb/>the Statements, made in relation to the Number of the<lb/>prisoners. —<lb/>1. Remaining in prison on 12<hi rend="superscript">th</hi> month (ie 31 Dec.) 1801 — 345<lb/>2 Remaining in prison on 12<hi rend="superscript">th</hi> month (ie 31 Dec.) 1802 - 404<lb/><!-- This entire page has been marked out with an X --> | ||
42
§. 7. Rates of profit in pari materia
This deducted, as not belonging to the present purpose, remains
for the total Cost of the Prison this Year, Officers Salaries excepted
D20/23. C: 66
Add Total Expence of Officers Salaries, as per pages 23, 25, 28 & 28
in the Account given of the prison for the last preceding year,
as above . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,025.00
Hence Total of Expence . . . . . . . . . . . .26,748.66
From this Total of Expence deduct net profit as above
remains balance on the side of Expence . . . . 5874.23
In this account, as in the first mentioned of these illustrative
Accounts, to apply the data to the Case of the Claimants
intended prison. —
Here again, had the receipts been exactly equal to the
Expences, the same equality being supposed to have place in the
Case of the Claimants Prison, No. of Prisoners 1000, the allowance
made to him for that number, viz! at £12 a head, would have
been, the whole of it, so much net profit. —
But, instead of being equal i.e. each of them to the other
as 26,748.66 to 26,748..66 — the receipts are to the Expences
but as 21,874.43 to 26,748.66, the Expences to the Receipts but
as these two sums inverseley; therefore as 26,748..66 is to
21,874.43 so is £12,000 to the number sought, being the
number expressive of the Annual Quantity of net profit,
which, at this rate, would have accrued to the Claimant
in his Quality of Manager, contracting on the above terms
viz . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . £9814.0.0
Multiplied by the Common Multiplier 24 1/2, expressive of the
number of Years, this gives for the compensation money due,
according to this rate . . . . . . . . . . £240,418.0.0
In the report of thi same Year, 1802, in an Account
printed on the back of p. 3 the following are among
the Statements, made in relation to the Number of the
prisoners. —
1. Remaining in prison on 12th month (ie 31 Dec.) 1801 — 345
2 Remaining in prison on 12th month (ie 31 Dec.) 1802 - 404
|
Identifier: | JB/122/478/004"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 122. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
122 |
Panopticon |
||
|
478 |
|||
|
004 |
|||
|
Copy/fair copy sheet |
4 |
||
|
Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property. |
F39 / F40 / F41 / F42 |
||
|
C WILMOTT 1811 |
|||
|
Andreas Louriottis |
|||
|
1811 |
|||
|
004 |
|||
