JB/096/001/003: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/096/001/003: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/096/001/003|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/096/001/003|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
  Or perhaps we mistake our Author's meaning. <del>by</del> We<lb/> suppose<del>ng</del><!-- <!-- he wrote over the i and turned it into an e when he made it suppose instead of supposing -->the idea of obligation to imply <del>a power of choice
  Or perhaps we mistake our Author's meaning. <del>by</del> We<lb/> suppose <del>ng</del><!-- he wrote over the i and turned it into an e when he made it suppose instead of supposing -->the idea of obligation to imply <del>a power of choice
</del>, a<lb/> power of doing or not doing; whereas our author means all the while<lb/> that we are not <sic>bounden</sic> by the Laws of another <sic>unlefs</sic> they do by<lb/> some natural violence to constrain us, as to render it <sic>impofsible</sic><lb/> for us to act otherwise than as they direct us. And indeed<lb/> in another place, <note>Vol.1.p.57.</note> <del>our Author
</del>, a<lb/> power of doing or not doing; whereas our author means all the while<lb/> that we are not <sic>bounden</sic> by the Laws of another <sic>unlefs</sic> they do by<lb/> some natural violence to constrain us, as to render it <sic>impofsible</sic><lb/> for us to act otherwise than as they direct us. And indeed<lb/> in another place, <note>Vol.1.p.57.</note> <del>our Author
</del> <add>he</add> declares this to be<lb/> the strict sense of obligation.  
</del> <add>he</add> declares this to be<lb/> the strict sense of obligation.  


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''





Revision as of 01:58, 28 October 2010

Click Here To Edit

Or perhaps we mistake our Author's meaning. by We
suppose ngthe idea of obligation to imply a power of choice

, a
power of doing or not doing; whereas our author means all the while
that we are not bounden by the Laws of another unlefs they do by
some natural violence to constrain us, as to render it impofsible
for us to act otherwise than as they direct us. And indeed
in another place, Vol.1.p.57. our Author he declares this to be
the strict sense of obligation.




Identifier: | JB/096/001/003"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 96.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

096

Main Headings

comment on the commentaries

Folio number

001

Info in main headings field

Image

003

Titles

section i / account of laws in general

Category

collectanea

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c1 f1 / c2 / c3 / c4

Penner

168

Watermarks

[[watermarks::gr [quartered royal arms motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

31005

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in