★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
Auto loaded |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''[{{fullurl:JB/096/015/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | '''[{{fullurl:JB/096/015/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
'' | |||
<p>they mistook an exception to a general rule, for the | |||
<lb/> | |||
genera rule itself: & then thought themselves justified | |||
<lb/> | |||
in dispossessing the infidels of Lands <del>in</del> <add>of</add> which | |||
<lb/> | |||
they were in righful possession upon the same | |||
<lb/> | |||
principle this author in another place: that on the | |||
<lb/> | |||
conquest of an <hi rend='underline'>infidel</hi> country, the conquered have | |||
<lb/> | |||
less rights than other <del>conquer</del> <add>nations</add> in the same predicament. <note>Note The intelligent reader <del>will easily perceive <gap/></del> <add>cannot mistake nor</add> the <unclear>candid</unclear> reader misinterpret my meaning. — I am not examining the validity nor the fitness of the laws of Revelation. I am only exposing the abuses of <del>it</del> men who misapply them, & give them an extension beyond what their Author intended and the examples above cited will prove that these abuses have been productive of the <gap/> mischiefs<!-- though Bentham has got the i and e back to front. Not unusual spelling per se (more mis-spelling error), so not added to unusual spelling list! -->, & would be so again, if <unclear>Men</unclear> of the Authors turn of mind hold the reins of government in a conquering state</note></p> | |||
<pb/> | |||
they mistook an exception to a general rule, for the
genera rule itself: & then thought themselves justified
in dispossessing the infidels of Lands in of which
they were in righful possession upon the same
principle this author in another place: that on the
conquest of an infidel country, the conquered have
less rights than other conquer nations in the same predicament. Note The intelligent reader will easily perceive cannot mistake nor the candid reader misinterpret my meaning. — I am not examining the validity nor the fitness of the laws of Revelation. I am only exposing the abuses of it men who misapply them, & give them an extension beyond what their Author intended and the examples above cited will prove that these abuses have been productive of the mischiefs, & would be so again, if Men of the Authors turn of mind hold the reins of government in a conquering state
---page break---
Identifier: | JB/096/015/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 96. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
096 |
comment on the commentaries |
||
015 |
|||
002 |
addenda to sect. iii |
||
collectanea |
2 |
||
recto |
c40 / |
||
168 |
[[watermarks::[lion with crown motif]]] |
||
[[notes_public::"to be copied" [note not in bentham's hand]]] |
31019 |
||