★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- this page features two texts, one darker and one lighter; the lighter appear to be the note and i am beginning with the lighter --> | <!-- this page features two texts, one darker and one lighter; the lighter appear to be the note and i am beginning with the lighter --> | ||
not | not necessarily included; & and supposing the definition to<lb/> have been just (which it is not) supposing it not to<lb/> have mistaken the foundation of Law. For <del>the</del> <lb/> the Law itself what followed <sic>woned</sic> have been <lb/> | ||
consistent enough. But it was a strange attempt <lb/> indeed to back these inferences to our Author's defini-<lb/> -tion of Law. _ To make God for instance<hi rend='superscript'>+</hi> <hi rend='underline'>pres-</hi> <note>+ Vol. 1 p.B of</note> <lb/> <hi rend='underline'>-scribe</hi> <hi rend='underline'>Laws</hi> <sic>W-himself:</sic> that is, be at once <add><hi rend='underline'>his own</hi></add> Supe-<lb/> :rior & Inferior; has <unclear>questionable reading</unclear> & Man; _ To make Slaves feel<lb/> obligation; or to <del>tie</del> make man choose without choice;<lb/> will without volition._<p>paragraph</p> | consistent enough. But it was a strange attempt <lb/> indeed to back these inferences to our Author's defini-<lb/> -tion of Law. _ To make God for instance<hi rend='superscript'>+</hi> <hi rend='underline'>pres-</hi> <note>+ Vol. 1 p.B of</note> <lb/> <hi rend='underline'>-scribe</hi> <hi rend='underline'>Laws</hi> <sic>W-himself:</sic> that is, be at once <add><hi rend='underline'>his own</hi></add> Supe-<lb/> :rior & Inferior; has <unclear>questionable reading</unclear> & Man; _ To make Slaves feel<lb/> obligation; or to <del>tie</del> make man choose without choice;<lb/> will without volition._<lb/><p>paragraph</p> The <gap/> design of <del>the Commentaries</del> <hi rend='superscript'>our author</hi> is <hi rend='superscript'>to</hi> <hi rend='underline'>methodise</hi><lb/> & <hi rend='underline'>explain"</hi> a science which had been hitherto <hi rend='underline'>been</hi>but<lb/> little cultivated. _ <foreign>Quod dedit principium</foreign> <unclear>udeniens</unclear>?_<lb/> I shall leave the reader to answer this question. <del>The</del> <lb/> <del>Ancients too were fond of talking of </del> <unclear>Horace</unclear> too <del>was</del> of old talked much about<add>their</add> <hi rend='underline'><unclear>heiduscodo</unclear></hi>.<lb/> And yet it was reserved to a great Genius <del>of the present</del> <unclear>Foud</unclear><add>own to discover</add><lb/> <del>Age to discover,</del> 1800 years afterwards that there was any order at all, in <lb/> the very book where <del>this phrase occurs. <gap/> The</del> he recommends it._ Perhaps our learned<lb/> Commentator may one day meet with us able a friend.<lb/> At <gap/> He seems to be a great Admirer of the <unclear>Anerents;</unclear> <del>Sonth</del> and<lb/> 9<pb/> | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | ||
not necessarily included; & and supposing the definition to
have been just (which it is not) supposing it not to
have mistaken the foundation of Law. For the
the Law itself what followed woned have been
consistent enough. But it was a strange attempt
indeed to back these inferences to our Author's defini-
-tion of Law. _ To make God for instance+ pres- + Vol. 1 p.B of
-scribe Laws W-himself: that is, be at once his own Supe-
:rior & Inferior; has questionable reading & Man; _ To make Slaves feel
obligation; or to tie make man choose without choice;
will without volition._
paragraph
The design of the Commentaries our author is to methodise
& explain" a science which had been hitherto beenbut
little cultivated. _ Quod dedit principium udeniens?_
I shall leave the reader to answer this question. The
Ancients too were fond of talking of Horace too was of old talked much abouttheir heiduscodo.
And yet it was reserved to a great Genius of the present Foudown to discover
Age to discover, 1800 years afterwards that there was any order at all, in
the very book where this phrase occurs. The he recommends it._ Perhaps our learned
Commentator may one day meet with us able a friend.
At He seems to be a great Admirer of the Anerents; Sonth and
9
---page break---
|
Identifier: | JB/096/004/003"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 96. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
096 |
comment on the commentaries |
||
|
004 |
|||
|
003 |
|||
|
collectanea |
4 |
||
|
recto |
c7 / c8 / c9 / c10 |
||
|
168 |
[[watermarks::gr [quartered royal arms motif]]] |
||
|
[[notes_public::"to be copied" [note not in bentham's hand]]] |
31008 |
||
