JB/073/007/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/073/007/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
TimCauser (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/073/007/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/073/007/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>DEFANCATION Words</head>
 
<p>According to the doctrine which for a long time<lb/>
prevailed <!-- white space --> a man who would vent Scandal<lb/>
against another so as to subject himself to<lb/>
the chastisement of the Laws, must <add>have</add> <sic>studyed</sic> <add>hard</add> that<lb/>
Law for words, to do it in, &amp; then it would be a <add>great</add> chance whether he would succeed.</p>
 
<p>The <sic>emphaticalness</sic> of <add>the</add> expression instead<lb/>
of heightening was formed, when subjected to<lb/>
the absurd lists which the Lawyers of those<lb/>
days, had set up, <sic>unless</sic> to have utterly destroyed<lb/>
the effect
</p>
 
<p><add>While these sanctioned</add> I was more <unclear>proud</unclear> of imposition upon the subject<lb/>
to tell him that the Law gave <add>would give</add> him<lb/>
compensation for <del>the loss of</del> <add>an injury to</add> his good name,<lb/>
when for one case in which this <del>injury</del> <add>compensation</add> could be<lb/>
<add><del>given</del> obtained</add> in ten others the injury would be aggravated<lb/>
by the <sic>expences</sic> of a fruitless application <note>Major If ever there was a perjur'd man in England, then not one: <add>Minor</add> but there has been a <sic>perjurd</sic></add> man in England; in <del><gap/></del> <add>Conclusion</add> Therefore <gap/> <gap/> one. I do not know whether <gap/> that would have satisfied all of them: they might want his name.</note>
 
 
</p>





Revision as of 17:09, 2 November 2010

Click Here To Edit

DEFANCATION Words

According to the doctrine which for a long time
prevailed a man who would vent Scandal
against another so as to subject himself to
the chastisement of the Laws, must have studyed hard that
Law for words, to do it in, & then it would be a great chance whether he would succeed.

The emphaticalness of the expression instead
of heightening was formed, when subjected to
the absurd lists which the Lawyers of those
days, had set up, unless to have utterly destroyed
the effect

While these sanctioned I was more proud of imposition upon the subject
to tell him that the Law gave would give him
compensation for the loss of an injury to his good name,
when for one case in which this injury compensation could be
given obtained in ten others the injury would be aggravated
by the expences of a fruitless application Major If ever there was a perjur'd man in England, then not one: Minor but there has been a perjurd</add> man in England; in Conclusion Therefore one. I do not know whether that would have satisfied all of them: they might want his name.




Identifier: | JB/073/007/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 73.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

073

Main Headings

law in general

Folio number

007

Info in main headings field

defamation words

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f1

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[partial motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

23847

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in