JB/073/053/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/073/053/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/073/053/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/073/053/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
THEFT.<lb/><lb/>same Idea in substance, only as if it were under a different grammatical Modification - the two first being used where a Verb or a participle, the latter where a Substantive is required.<lb/>The use of the word Theft is governed by the nature of the lut; and 'tis from hence as <del>she</del> shall soon see that it takes its' Definition.<lb/>The Word Larcery has its Import coextensive only with ^<hi rend='superscript'>the</hi> punishment annexed by the peculiar jurisfouederve  of our own Country to the main Body of the other Title applying in it's proper signification only leases only of Theft as are furnished with the punishment called Felony.<lb/> With Regard to this Definition,the source of which will be hereafter explained, it is sufficient at present to observe, that it is not taken from any Difference in the Nature of the Act: <del>so that</del> if <del>where</del> therefore we meet with any Oafsage in a practical Book which intimates that of such & such a subject Larceny cannot be committed, we are not to conceive that the Act of stealing ^ <hi rend='superscript'>it</hi> is deficient in any of those Qualities which if it had been committed on certain other subjects would have denominated it<lb/> Larceny
 
 


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 17:14, 4 November 2010

Click Here To Edit

THEFT.

same Idea in substance, only as if it were under a different grammatical Modification - the two first being used where a Verb or a participle, the latter where a Substantive is required.
The use of the word Theft is governed by the nature of the lut; and 'tis from hence as she shall soon see that it takes its' Definition.
The Word Larcery has its Import coextensive only with ^the punishment annexed by the peculiar jurisfouederve of our own Country to the main Body of the other Title applying in it's proper signification only leases only of Theft as are furnished with the punishment called Felony.
With Regard to this Definition,the source of which will be hereafter explained, it is sufficient at present to observe, that it is not taken from any Difference in the Nature of the Act: so that if where therefore we meet with any Oafsage in a practical Book which intimates that of such & such a subject Larceny cannot be committed, we are not to conceive that the Act of stealing ^ it is deficient in any of those Qualities which if it had been committed on certain other subjects would have denominated it
Larceny



Identifier: | JB/073/053/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 73.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

073

Main Headings

law in general

Folio number

053

Info in main headings field

theft

Image

001

Titles

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f14

Penner

Watermarks

[[watermarks::propatria [britannia motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

23893

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in