★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet'' | ''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet'' | ||
of conduct, and the doctrines only, are<lb/>the rule of faith: the one are intended to <lb/>teach us what we ought to do: the other hold<lb/>out to us, motives for so doing. + We <del>might have</del><add>have first</add> noticed this mistake of our author<del>'s</del><lb/>in the preceding section: <del>for he had before</del><add>where he told</add><lb/>us, that the <hi rend='underline'>doctrines</hi> delivered by imme<lb/>diate revelation were called the <hi rend='underline'>divine law:</hi><lb/> He might have learned clearer ideas even from<lb/> <del>whereas every sensible</del><unclear>corilerson</unclear>theology <del>far</del><lb/>confused as they generally are, <del>yet</del>they do <add>distinguish</add><lb/><del>carefully distinguished</del>the doctrines from the <lb/>precepts.<p>He has distinguished the rule of civil con<lb/>duct from the rule of moral conduct</p> | of conduct, and the doctrines only, are<lb/>the rule of faith: the one are intended to <lb/>teach us what we ought to do: the other hold<lb/>out to us, motives for so doing. + We <del>might have</del><add>have first</add> noticed this mistake of our author<del>'s</del><lb/>in the preceding section: <del>for he had before</del><add>where he told</add><lb/>us, that the <hi rend='underline'>doctrines</hi> delivered by imme<lb/>diate revelation were called the <hi rend='underline'>divine law:</hi><lb/> He might have learned clearer ideas even from<lb/> <del>whereas every sensible</del><unclear>corilerson</unclear>theology <del>far</del><lb/>confused as they generally are, <del>yet</del>they do <add>distinguish</add><lb/><del>carefully distinguished</del>the doctrines from the <lb/>precepts.<p>He has distinguished the rule of civil con<lb/>duct from the rule of moral conduct</p> <del>whereas</del><lb/> As our author draws some very curious consequences from this distinc<lb/>tion <del>must examine it with some attention</del> <add>it must not be slightly past over </add><lb/><del>had he understood the nature of morality he</del><lb/>Morality considered as a Science, is the doctrine of <del>would </del><add>social</add><lb/>duties a Rule of moral <del>duties</del>conduct would be a rule directing us<lb/>how<pb/> | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} |
This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet
of conduct, and the doctrines only, are
the rule of faith: the one are intended to
teach us what we ought to do: the other hold
out to us, motives for so doing. + We might havehave first noticed this mistake of our author's
in the preceding section: for he had beforewhere he told
us, that the doctrines delivered by imme
diate revelation were called the divine law:
He might have learned clearer ideas even from
whereas every sensiblecorilersontheology far
confused as they generally are, yetthey do distinguish
carefully distinguishedthe doctrines from the
precepts.
He has distinguished the rule of civil con
duct from the rule of moral conduct
whereas
As our author draws some very curious consequences from this distinc
tion must examine it with some attention it must not be slightly past over
had he understood the nature of morality he
Morality considered as a Science, is the doctrine of would social
duties a Rule of moral dutiesconduct would be a rule directing us
how
---page break---
Identifier: | JB/096/033/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 96. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
096 |
comment on the commentaries |
||
033 |
|||
001 |
|||
collectanea |
4 |
||
recto |
c84 / c85 / c86 / c87 |
||
168 |
[[watermarks::gr [quartered royal arms motif]]] |
||
[[notes_public::"to be copied" [note not in bentham's hand]]] |
31037 |
||