JB/122/328/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/122/328/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<p> <add> 20 July 1808</add> <add> + </add> <add> 9 </add> <lb/> <note>Vouchers not the best evidence</note></p> <p> <add> 9 </add> <lb/>But - though these documents were sent in, <del> <gap/> </del> <add> in contemplation of their </add> serving as <lb/>far as they would go, in the character of <hi rend="underline">vouchers</hi> - <add> in the character of </add> regular <lb/>vouchers, or in whatever other character, as <unclear>presumable</unclear> as <lb/>evidence of good faith, they might be found capable of<lb/>serving - they were not, <del> replied upon even </del> <add> even </add> within the sphere <lb/>of their <del> respective </del> application, <add> relied upon</add> as <hi rend="underline">sole or</hi> sufficient, <lb/>or <add> even ></add> preferable, evidence. the person so often spoken of, <lb/>as a person <del> capable</del> by which <del> evidence </del> <add> testimony </add> presented in <lb/> whatever shape, it might be the pleasure of the Board<lb/>to indicate a much more <hi rend="underline">particular</hi> as well as in every <lb/>other account more <del> sufficiently</del> <add> satisfactory</add> account of the goods <lb/><add> so </add> received, and the application made of them, would be <lb/> given, than any that could be given by any such <lb/> <del> <gap/> <add> <hi rend="underline"><gap/></hi> </add> list or lists, however dignified with the name of <lb/><hi rend="underline">Invoices</hi> and <hi rend="underline">Vouchers</hi>.</p> <p> Without these Vouchers - <add> without </add> these Invoices and <lb/>Bills of Exchange <add> - accepted, </add> paid, and <del> pre</del> taken into the hands of the <lb/>drawer in consequence, the <del> evidence </del> <add> testimony </add> so tendered would <lb/>have been sufficient.  Imperfect as is the collection <lb/>of them, so far as they go, if they do no good, at least <lb/<>they do no harm.  But they do good: for so far as <lb/>they go, so far they speak in confirmation of the <lb/> fresh <hi rend="underline">account</hi> obtained subsequently from the same quarter. </p> <p> As to <hi rend="underline">fraud,</hi> supposing any thing of that sort in the <lb/>case, in what imaginable supposition could any plan <lb/> of that sort have derived any advantage, either from the <lb/> sending in of those that are sent, or from the not sending in of those that are not sent? <lb/><!-- text continues at right angles --> To these questions it surely behoves those, by <del> whose fraud <gap/>  suspected, if any such <gap/> <gap/> </del> <add> any the slightest suspicion of <add> possible</add> <add> fraud is entertained, if any such there be,</add> to find and give an answer. </p>   
<p> <add> 20 July 1808</add> <add> + </add> <add> 9 </add> <lb/> <note>Vouchers not the best evidence</note></p> <p> <add> 9 </add> <lb/>But - though these documents were sent in, <del> to </del> <add> in contemplation of their </add> serving as <lb/>far as they would go, in the character of <hi rend="underline">vouchers</hi> - <add> in the character of </add> regular <lb/>vouchers, or in whatever other character, as <unclear>presumable</unclear> as <lb/>evidence of good faith, they might be found capable of<lb/>serving - they were not, <del> replied upon even </del> <add> even </add> within the sphere <lb/>of their <del> respective </del> application, <add> relied upon</add> as <hi rend="underline">sole or</hi> sufficient, <lb/>or <add> even </add> preferable, evidence. the person so often spoken of, <lb/>(Mr Lloyd) <del> <gap/> </del> <add> stands </add> on the face of this Account, spoken of <lb/>as a person <del> capable</del> by which <del> evidence </del> <add> testimony </add> presented in <lb/> whatever shape, it might be the pleasure of the Board<lb/>to indicate a much more <hi rend="underline">particular</hi>, as well as in every <lb/>other account more <del> sufficiently</del> <add> satisfactory</add> account of the goods <lb/><add> so </add> received, and the application made of them, would be <lb/> given, than any that could be given by any such <lb/> <del> <gap/> </del> <add><del> <add><hi rend="underline"><gap/></hi></add> list or lists, however dignified with the name of <lb/><hi rend="underline">Invoices</hi> and <hi rend="underline">Vouchers</hi>.</p> <p> Without these Vouchers - <add> without </add> these Invoices and <lb/>Bills of Exchange <add> - accepted, </add> paid, and <del> pre</del> taken into the hands of the <lb/>drawer in consequence, the <del> evidence </del> <add> testimony </add> so tendered would <lb/>have been sufficient.  Imperfect as is the collection <lb/>of them, so far as they go, if they do no good, at least <lb/>they do no harm.  But they do good: for so far as <lb/>they go, so far they speak in confirmation of the <lb/> fresh <hi rend="underline">account</hi> obtained subsequently from the same quarter. </p> <p> As to <hi rend="underline">fraud,</hi> supposing any thing of that sort in the <lb/>case, in what imaginable supposition could any plan <lb/> of that sort have derived any advantage, either from the <lb/> sending in of those that are sent, or from the not sending in of those that are not sent? <lb/><!-- text continues at right angles --> To these questions it surely behoves those, by whom <del> fraud <gap/>  suspected, if any such <gap/> <gap/> </del> <add> any the slightest suspicion of <add> possible</add> <add> fraud is entertained, if any such there be,</add> to find and give an answer. </p>   




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 16:06, 29 December 2013

'Click Here To Edit

20 July 1808 + 9
Vouchers not the best evidence

9
But - though these documents were sent in, to in contemplation of their serving as
far as they would go, in the character of vouchers - in the character of regular
vouchers, or in whatever other character, as presumable as
evidence of good faith, they might be found capable of
serving - they were not, replied upon even even within the sphere
of their respective application, relied upon as sole or sufficient,
or even preferable, evidence. the person so often spoken of,
(Mr Lloyd) stands on the face of this Account, spoken of
as a person capable by which evidence testimony presented in
whatever shape, it might be the pleasure of the Board
to indicate a much more particular, as well as in every
other account more sufficiently satisfactory account of the goods
so received, and the application made of them, would be
given, than any that could be given by any such
<add> list or lists, however dignified with the name of
Invoices and Vouchers.

Without these Vouchers - without these Invoices and
Bills of Exchange - accepted, paid, and pre taken into the hands of the
drawer in consequence, the evidence testimony so tendered would
have been sufficient. Imperfect as is the collection
of them, so far as they go, if they do no good, at least
they do no harm. But they do good: for so far as
they go, so far they speak in confirmation of the
fresh account obtained subsequently from the same quarter.

As to fraud, supposing any thing of that sort in the
case, in what imaginable supposition could any plan
of that sort have derived any advantage, either from the
sending in of those that are sent, or from the not sending in of those that are not sent?
To these questions it surely behoves those, by whom fraud suspected, if any such any the slightest suspicion of <add> possible fraud is entertained, if any such there be, to find and give an answer.



Identifier: | JB/122/328/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 122.

Date_1

1808-07-21

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

122

Main Headings

Panopticon

Folio number

328

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property.

Page Numbering

D9 / E9

Penner

Watermarks

TH 1806

Marginals

Paper Producer

Andre Morellet

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1806

Notes public

See note to letter 1986, vol. 7

ID Number

001

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in