JB/117/018/003: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/117/018/003: Difference between revisions

Lea Stern (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Lea Stern (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 8: Line 8:
<p>The buildings I would wish by all means <lb/>should be of wood the reasons seem conclusive <lb/>the relief would be immediate: the <add>first</add> expence would <lb/>be trifling: <add>in point of durability</add> the duration would it is true <del>not <lb/>to</del> fall very far short <del>of that</del> of stone: but it <lb/>would be at least proportionable to the expence: <lb/>fire as far as property is <del>concerned</del> is in question <lb/>would be the undertaker's concern: <add>but</add> it is provided <lb/>against not only by <del>all</del> the all powerful influence <lb/>of the inspection principle, but a variety <lb/>of particular contrivances. </p>  
<p>The buildings I would wish by all means <lb/>should be of wood the reasons seem conclusive <lb/>the relief would be immediate: the <add>first</add> expence would <lb/>be trifling: <add>in point of durability</add> the duration would it is true <del>not <lb/>to</del> fall very far short <del>of that</del> of stone: but it <lb/>would be at least proportionable to the expence: <lb/>fire as far as property is <del>concerned</del> is in question <lb/>would be the undertaker's concern: <add>but</add> it is provided <lb/>against not only by <del>all</del> the all powerful influence <lb/>of the inspection principle, but a variety <lb/>of particular contrivances. </p>  


 
<p>The relief would be immediate: this consideration <lb/>ought of itself to be decisive: a multitude of <lb/>lives, I hope I am not too sanguine in saying <lb/>some hundreds <add>are at stake <del>depend</del> upon it</add> would in all probability be saved <lb/>by it: not to mention several years of misery or <lb/>comfort to so many thousands. <add>If in wood,</add> Three months would <lb/>suffice for the creation of the number of Panopticons <lb/>required: if in stone scarce three years. On the present <lb/> <add>footing</add> </p>





Revision as of 01:33, 22 January 2014

Click Here To Edit

7 Bicetre Proposal

The buildings I would wish by all means
should be of wood the reasons seem conclusive
the relief would be immediate: the first expence would
be trifling: in point of durability the duration would it is true not
to
fall very far short of that of stone: but it
would be at least proportionable to the expence:
fire as far as property is concerned is in question
would be the undertaker's concern: but it is provided
against not only by all the all powerful influence
of the inspection principle, but a variety
of particular contrivances.

The relief would be immediate: this consideration
ought of itself to be decisive: a multitude of
lives, I hope I am not too sanguine in saying
some hundreds are at stake depend upon it would in all probability be saved
by it: not to mention several years of misery or
comfort to so many thousands. If in wood, Three months would
suffice for the creation of the number of Panopticons
required: if in stone scarce three years. On the present
footing












































Identifier: | JB/117/018/003"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 117.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

117

Main Headings

panopticon

Folio number

018

Info in main headings field

bicetre proposal

Image

003

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f5 / f6 / f7 / f8

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::gr [crown motif] [britannia with shield motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

38635

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in