★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''[{{fullurl:JB/096/036/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | '''[{{fullurl:JB/096/036/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
Line 12: | Line 9: | ||
<del>Consciences, then" the multitude of penal</del> | <del>Consciences, then" the multitude of penal</del> | ||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
<add>of our penal laws is an evil: but a much | <add>of our penal laws is an evil: but a much greater evil, & which is | ||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
much more likely to ensnare us, is their want<!-- symbol above letter w --> of precision in</add> | much more likely to ensnare us, is their want<!-- symbol above letter w --> of precision in</add> | ||
Line 22: | Line 19: | ||
want of publicity is <unclear>promulying</unclear> them. Let the Legislature</add> | want of publicity is <unclear>promulying</unclear> them. Let the Legislature</add> | ||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
<del>"an | <del>"an impolitic, but would also be a very wicked</del> | ||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
<add>measure the degree by the ends of punishment: let it explain | <add>measure the degree by the ends of punishment: let it explain | ||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
itself with | itself with precision: let it not notify it's will with sufficient</add> | ||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
<del>thing, if every such law were a <del>Subject</del></del> | <del>thing, if every such law were a <del>Subject</del></del> | ||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
<add>publicity, & there will be no thing impolitic or wicked in our | <add>publicity, & there will be no thing impolitic or wicked in our | ||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
penal laws: no fear <add><gap/></add> of their multitudes honed ensnare</add> | penal laws: no fear <add><gap/></add> of their multitudes honed ensnare</add> | ||
Line 44: | Line 38: | ||
<del>— He says, what I profess I do not understand.</del> | <del>— He says, what I profess I do not understand.</del> | ||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
<add>The | <add><del>The Author seems to imagine, that the moral sanction has</del> | ||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
<del>The n</del> The Author saw <del>th</del> or thought he saw some difference</add> | <del>The n</del> The Author saw <del>th</del> or thought he saw some difference</add> | ||
Line 52: | Line 46: | ||
<add><!-- pen marks or symbol? -->in what he calls the natural & municipal Law: this | <add><!-- pen marks or symbol? -->in what he calls the natural & municipal Law: this | ||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
difference <add>lies</ | difference <add>lies</add> <del>was this, that his natural law had only the</del></add> | ||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
<del>itself with precision, and notifys it's</del> | <del>itself with precision, and notifys it's</del> | ||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
<add><del>moral, & not the legal Sanction: he mistook</del> | |||
<lb/> | |||
not in the<del>ir</del> directory but in sanctionary part: for the rule</add> | |||
<lb/> | |||
<del>will with sufficient publicity, I cannot</del> | <del>will with sufficient publicity, I cannot</del> | ||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
<add>of conduct for a good man & a good Citizen must be the | |||
<lb/> | |||
same: the Characters are inseparable. Here was the</add> | |||
<lb/> | |||
<del>understand, how it can ensnare the</del> | <del>understand, how it can ensnare the</del> | ||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
<add>Author's first mistake: Because the sanctions are different | |||
<lb/> | |||
he supposed the end to be so too. He saw likewise or thought</add> | |||
<lb/> | |||
<del>conscience of the Subject. I do not mean</del> | <del>conscience of the Subject. I do not mean</del> | ||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
<add>he saw some difference in the sanctionary part & | |||
<del>to justify the multiplicity of our penal <add>Laws</add></del><lb/></ | <lb/> | ||
the difference is, that his natural law has only the moral</add> | |||
<lb/> | |||
<del>to justify the multiplicity of our penal <add>Laws</add></del> | |||
<lb/> | |||
<add>sanction, not the legal: here again he mistook: & because | |||
<lb/> | |||
municipal law has the legal sanction, concluded it could | |||
<lb/> | |||
not have the moral: & therefore supposing Conscience | |||
<lb/> | |||
to let know not what, & affected only the the moral <add>sanction</add></add> | |||
<lb/></p> | |||
<head>97</head> | <head>97</head> | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} |
To be copied human laws to be binding upon mens
multitude of penal laws I neither know: no doubt the multiplicity
Consciences, then" the multitude of penal
of our penal laws is an evil: but a much greater evil, & which is
much more likely to ensnare us, is their want of precision in
"laws would not only be looked upon as
enouncing them: s the want of proportion of fixing them: & the
want of publicity is promulying them. Let the Legislature
"an impolitic, but would also be a very wicked
measure the degree by the ends of punishment: let it explain
itself with precision: let it not notify it's will with sufficient
thing, if every such law were a Subject
publicity, & there will be no thing impolitic or wicked in our
penal laws: no fear <add> of their multitudes honed ensnare</add>
"snare for the conscience of the Subject".
men's consciences.
The mistake of our Author seems
— He says, what I profess I do not understand.
The Author seems to imagine, that the moral sanction has
The n The Author saw th or thought he saw some difference
If the Legislature explains
in what he calls the natural & municipal Law: this
difference <add>lies was this, that his natural law had only the</add>
itself with precision, and notifys it's
moral, & not the legal Sanction: he mistook
not in their directory but in sanctionary part: for the rule
will with sufficient publicity, I cannot
of conduct for a good man & a good Citizen must be the
same: the Characters are inseparable. Here was the
understand, how it can ensnare the
Author's first mistake: Because the sanctions are different
he supposed the end to be so too. He saw likewise or thought
conscience of the Subject. I do not mean
he saw some difference in the sanctionary part &
the difference is, that his natural law has only the moral
to justify the multiplicity of our penal Laws
sanction, not the legal: here again he mistook: & because
municipal law has the legal sanction, concluded it could
not have the moral: & therefore supposing Conscience
to let know not what, & affected only the the moral <add>sanction</add>
97
Identifier: | JB/096/036/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 96. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
096 |
comment on the commentaries |
||
036 |
|||
002 |
|||
collectanea |
4 |
||
recto |
c96 / c97 / c98 / c99 |
||
168 |
[[watermarks::gr [quartered royal arms motif]]] |
||
[[notes_public::"to be copied" [note not in bentham's hand]]] |
31040 |
||