JB/096/036/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/096/036/002: Difference between revisions

Diane Folan (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Diane Folan (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/096/036/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/096/036/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
under construction ...




Line 12: Line 9:
<del>Consciences, then" the multitude of penal</del>  
<del>Consciences, then" the multitude of penal</del>  
<lb/>
<lb/>
<add>of our penal laws is an evil: but a much grater evil, &amp; which is  
<add>of our penal laws is an evil: but a much greater evil, &amp; which is  
<lb/>
<lb/>
much more likely to ensnare us, is their want<!-- symbol above letter w --> of precision in</add>
much more likely to ensnare us, is their want<!-- symbol above letter w --> of precision in</add>
Line 22: Line 19:
want of publicity is <unclear>promulying</unclear> them.  Let the Legislature</add>
want of publicity is <unclear>promulying</unclear> them.  Let the Legislature</add>
<lb/>
<lb/>
<del>"an <unclear>impolitic</unclear>, but would also be a very wicked</del>
<del>"an impolitic, but would also be a very wicked</del>
<lb/>
<lb/>
<add>measure the degree by the ends of punishment: let it explain  
<add>measure the degree by the ends of punishment: let it explain  
<lb/>
<lb/>
itself with prevision: let it not notify it's will with sufficient</add>
itself with precision: let it not notify it's will with sufficient</add>
<lb/>
<lb/>
<del>thing, if every such law were a <del>Subject</del></del>
<del>thing, if every such law were a <del>Subject</del></del>
<lb/>
<del>"<unclear>snare</unclear> for the conference of the Subject".</del>
<lb/>
<lb/>
<add>publicity, &amp; there will be no thing impolitic or wicked in our
<add>publicity, &amp; there will be no thing impolitic or wicked in our
<lb/>
<lb/>
<lb/>
penal laws: no fear <add><gap/></add> of their multitudes honed ensnare</add>
penal laws: no fear <add><gap/></add> of their multitudes honed ensnare</add>
Line 44: Line 38:
<del>&#x2014; He says, what I profess I do not understand.</del>
<del>&#x2014; He says, what I profess I do not understand.</del>
<lb/>
<lb/>
<add>The author seems to imagine, that the moral sanction has</del>
<add><del>The Author seems to imagine, that the moral sanction has</del>
<lb/>
<lb/>
<del>The n</del> The Author saw <del>th</del> or thought he saw some difference</add>
<del>The n</del> The Author saw <del>th</del> or thought he saw some difference</add>
Line 52: Line 46:
<add><!-- pen marks or symbol? -->in what he calls the natural &amp; municipal Law: this
<add><!-- pen marks or symbol? -->in what he calls the natural &amp; municipal Law: this
<lb/>
<lb/>
difference <add>lies</ad> <del>was this, that his natural law had only the</del></add>
difference <add>lies</add> <del>was this, that his natural law had only the</del></add>
<lb/>
<lb/>
<del>itself with precision, and notifys it's</del>
<del>itself with precision, and notifys it's</del>
<lb/>
<lb/>
 
<add><del>moral, &amp; not the legal Sanction: he mistook</del>
 
<lb/>
 
not in the<del>ir</del> directory but in sanctionary part: for the rule</add>
<lb/>
<del>will with sufficient publicity, I cannot</del>
<del>will with sufficient publicity, I cannot</del>
<lb/>
<lb/>
   
<add>of conduct for a good man &amp; a good Citizen must be the
<lb/>
same: the Characters are inseparable. Here was the</add> 
<lb/>
<del>understand, how it can ensnare the</del>
<del>understand, how it can ensnare the</del>
<lb/>
<lb/>
 
<add>Author's first mistake: Because the sanctions are different
<lb/>
he supposed the end to be so too.  He saw likewise or thought</add>
<lb/>
<del>conscience of the Subject.  I do not mean</del>
<del>conscience of the Subject.  I do not mean</del>
<lb/>
<lb/>
 
<add>he saw some difference in the sanctionary part &amp;
<del>to justify the multiplicity of our penal <add>Laws</add></del><lb/></p>
<lb/> 
 
the difference is, that his natural law has only the moral</add>
 
<lb/>
<del>to justify the multiplicity of our penal <add>Laws</add></del>
<lb/>
<add>sanction, not the legal: here again he mistook: &amp; because
<lb/>
municipal law has the legal sanction, concluded it could
<lb/>
not have the moral: &amp; therefore supposing Conscience
<lb/>
to let know not what, &amp; affected only the the moral <add>sanction</add></add>
<lb/></p>
<head>97</head>
<head>97</head>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 00:32, 5 December 2010

Click Here To Edit


To be copied human laws to be binding upon mens
multitude of penal laws I neither know: no doubt the multiplicity
Consciences, then" the multitude of penal
of our penal laws is an evil: but a much greater evil, & which is
much more likely to ensnare us, is their want of precision in

"laws would not only be looked upon as
enouncing them: s the want of proportion of fixing them: & the
want of publicity is promulying them. Let the Legislature

"an impolitic, but would also be a very wicked
measure the degree by the ends of punishment: let it explain
itself with precision: let it not notify it's will with sufficient

thing, if every such law were a Subject
publicity, & there will be no thing impolitic or wicked in our
penal laws: no fear <add>
of their multitudes honed ensnare</add>
"snare for the conscience of the Subject".
men's consciences.

The mistake of our Author seems
— He says, what I profess I do not understand.
The Author seems to imagine, that the moral sanction has
The n The Author saw th or thought he saw some difference

If the Legislature explains
in what he calls the natural & municipal Law: this
difference <add>lies
was this, that his natural law had only the</add>
itself with precision, and notifys it's
moral, & not the legal Sanction: he mistook
not in their directory but in sanctionary part: for the rule

will with sufficient publicity, I cannot
of conduct for a good man & a good Citizen must be the
same: the Characters are inseparable. Here was the

understand, how it can ensnare the
Author's first mistake: Because the sanctions are different
he supposed the end to be so too. He saw likewise or thought

conscience of the Subject. I do not mean
he saw some difference in the sanctionary part &
the difference is, that his natural law has only the moral

to justify the multiplicity of our penal Laws
sanction, not the legal: here again he mistook: & because
municipal law has the legal sanction, concluded it could
not have the moral: & therefore supposing Conscience
to let know not what, & affected only the the moral <add>sanction
</add>

97



Identifier: | JB/096/036/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 96.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

096

Main Headings

comment on the commentaries

Folio number

036

Info in main headings field

Image

002

Titles

Category

collectanea

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c96 / c97 / c98 / c99

Penner

168

Watermarks

[[watermarks::gr [quartered royal arms motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

[[notes_public::"to be copied" [note not in bentham's hand]]]

ID Number

31040

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in