JB/096/036/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/096/036/002: Difference between revisions

TimCauser (talk | contribs)
m Reverted edits by TimCauser (Talk) to last revision by TB Editor
TimCauser (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
<p><note><hi rend='underline'>To be copied</hi></note> <del>human laws to be binding upon mens</del> <add>multitude of penal laws I <del>neither know</del>: no doubt the multiplicity</add>
<p><note><hi rend='underline'>To be copied</hi></note> <del>human laws to be binding upon mens</del> <add>multitude of penal laws I <del>neither know</del>: no doubt the multiplicity</add>
<lb/>
<lb/>
<del>Consciences, then the multitude of penal</del> <add>of our penal laws is an evil: but a much greater evil, &amp; which is much more likely to ensnare us, is their want<!-- symbol above letter w --> of precision in</add>
<del>Consciences, then the multitude of penal</del> <add>of our penal laws is an evil: but a much greater evil, &amp; which is
<lb/>
<lb/>
<del>"laws would not only be looked upon as</del> <add><unclear>enouncing</unclear> them: <del><unclear>s</unclear></del> the want<!-- number 1 above letter w --> of proportion of fixing them: &amp; the  want of publicity in promulging them.  Let the Legislature</add>
much more likely to ensnare us, is their want<!-- symbol above letter w --> of precision in</add>
<lb/>
<lb/>
<del>"an impolitic, but would also be a very wicked</del> <add>measure the degree by the ends of punishment: let it explain itself with precision: let it not notify <sic>it's</sic> will with sufficient</add>
<del>"laws would not only be looked upon as</del> <add><unclear>enouncing</unclear> them: <del><unclear>s</unclear></del> the want<!-- number 1 above letter w --> of proportion of fixing them: &amp; the
<lb/> 
want of publicity in promulging them.  Let the Legislature</add>
<lb/>
<lb/>
<del>thing, if every such law were a <del>Subject</del></del> <add>publicity, &amp; there will be nothing impolitic or wicked in our penal laws: no fear <add><gap/></add> of their multitudes honed ensnare</add>
<del>"an impolitic, but would also be a very wicked</del> <add>measure the degree by the ends of punishment: let it explain
<lb/>
itself with precision: let it not notify <sic>it's</sic> will with sufficient</add>
<lb/>
<del>thing, if every such law were a <del>Subject</del></del> <add>publicity, &amp; there will be nothing impolitic or wicked in  
<lb/>
penal laws: no fear <add><gap/></add> of their multitudes honed ensnare</add>
<lb/>
<lb/>
<del>"snare for the conscience of the Subject".</del> <add>men's consciences.<lb/> <add><del>The mistake of our Author seems</del></add></add></p>
<del>"snare for the conscience of the Subject".</del> <add>men's consciences.<lb/> <add><del>The mistake of our Author seems</del></add></add></p>
Line 18: Line 26:
<del>&#x2014; He says, what I profess I do not understand.</del> <add><del>The Author seems to imagine, that the moral sanction has</del> <del>The n</del> The Author saw <del>th</del> or thought he saw some difference</add>
<del>&#x2014; He says, what I profess I do not understand.</del> <add><del>The Author seems to imagine, that the moral sanction has</del> <del>The n</del> The Author saw <del>th</del> or thought he saw some difference</add>
<lb/>
<lb/>
<del>If the Legislature explains</del> <add>in what he calls the natural &amp; municipal Law: this difference <add>lies</add> <del>was this, that his natural law had only the</del></add>
<del>If the Legislature explains</del> <add>in what he calls the natural &amp; municipal Law: this  
<lb/>
difference <add>lies</add> <del>was this, that his natural law had only the</del></add>
<lb/>
<lb/>
<del>itself with precision, and <sic>notifys</sic> <sic>it's</sic></del> <add><del>moral, &amp; not the legal Sanction: he mistook</del> not in the <del><unclear>ir</unclear></del> directory but in sanctionary part: for the rule</add>
<del>itself with precision, and <sic>notifys</sic> <sic>it's</sic></del> <add><del>moral, &amp; not the legal Sanction: he mistook</del> not in the <del><unclear>ir</unclear></del> directory but in sanctionary part: for the rule</add>
<lb/>
<lb/>
<del>will with sufficient publicity, I cannot</del> <add>of conduct for a good man &amp; a good Citizen must be the same: the Characters are inseparable.  Here was the</add>   
<del>will with sufficient publicity, I cannot</del> <add>of conduct for a good man &amp; a good Citizen must be the  
<lb/>
same: the Characters are inseparable.  Here was the</add>   
<lb/>
<lb/>
<del>understand, how it can ensnare the</del> <add>Author's first mistake: Because the sanctions are different he supposed the end to be so too.  He saw likewise or thought</add>
<del>understand, how it can ensnare the</del> <add>Author's first mistake: Because the sanctions are different
<lb/>
he supposed the end to be so too.  He saw likewise or thought</add>
<lb/>
<del>conscience of the Subject. I do not mean</del> <add>he saw some difference in the sanctionary part &amp;
<lb/>
the difference is, that his natural law has only the moral</add>
<lb/>
<del>to justify the multiplicity of our penal <add>Laws</add></del> <add>sanction, not the legal: here again he mistook: &amp; because
<lb/>
municipal law has the legal sanction, concluded it could
<lb/>  
<lb/>  
<del>conscience of the Subject. I do not mean</del> <add>he saw some difference in the sanctionary part &amp; the difference is, that his natural law has only the moral</add>
not have the moral: &amp; therefore supposing Conscience
<lb/>
<lb/>
<del>to justify the multiplicity of our penal <add>Laws</add></del> <add>sanction, not the legal: here again he mistook: &amp; because municipal law has the legal sanction, concluded it could not have the moral: &amp; therefore supposing Conscience to let know not what, &amp; affected only the the moral <add>sanction</add></add>
to let know not what, &amp; affected only the the moral <add>sanction</add></add>
</p>
</p>
<head>97</head>
<head>97</head>

Revision as of 22:21, 10 December 2010

Click Here To Edit


To be copied human laws to be binding upon mens multitude of penal laws I neither know: no doubt the multiplicity
Consciences, then the multitude of penal of our penal laws is an evil: but a much greater evil, & which is
much more likely to ensnare us, is their want of precision in

"laws would not only be looked upon as enouncing them: s the want of proportion of fixing them: & the
want of publicity in promulging them. Let the Legislature

"an impolitic, but would also be a very wicked measure the degree by the ends of punishment: let it explain
itself with precision: let it not notify it's will with sufficient

thing, if every such law were a Subject publicity, & there will be nothing impolitic or wicked in
penal laws: no fear <add>
of their multitudes honed ensnare</add>
"snare for the conscience of the Subject". men's consciences.
<add>The mistake of our Author seems
</add>

— He says, what I profess I do not understand. The Author seems to imagine, that the moral sanction has The n The Author saw th or thought he saw some difference
If the Legislature explains in what he calls the natural & municipal Law: this
difference <add>lies
was this, that his natural law had only the</add>
itself with precision, and notifys it's moral, & not the legal Sanction: he mistook not in the ir directory but in sanctionary part: for the rule
will with sufficient publicity, I cannot of conduct for a good man & a good Citizen must be the
same: the Characters are inseparable. Here was the

understand, how it can ensnare the Author's first mistake: Because the sanctions are different
he supposed the end to be so too. He saw likewise or thought

conscience of the Subject. I do not mean he saw some difference in the sanctionary part &
the difference is, that his natural law has only the moral

to justify the multiplicity of our penal Laws sanction, not the legal: here again he mistook: & because
municipal law has the legal sanction, concluded it could
not have the moral: & therefore supposing Conscience
to let know not what, & affected only the the moral <add>sanction
</add>

97



Identifier: | JB/096/036/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 96.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

096

Main Headings

comment on the commentaries

Folio number

036

Info in main headings field

Image

002

Titles

Category

collectanea

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c96 / c97 / c98 / c99

Penner

168

Watermarks

[[watermarks::gr [quartered royal arms motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

[[notes_public::"to be copied" [note not in bentham's hand]]]

ID Number

31040

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in