★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
|||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
<p><note><hi rend='underline'>To be copied</hi></note> <del>human laws to be binding upon mens</del> <add>multitude of penal laws I <del>neither know</del>: no doubt the multiplicity</add> | <p><note><hi rend='underline'>To be copied</hi></note> <del>human laws to be binding upon mens</del> <add>multitude of penal laws I <del>neither know</del>: no doubt the multiplicity</add> | ||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
<del>Consciences, then the multitude of penal</del> <add>of our penal laws is an evil: but a much greater evil, & which is | <del>Consciences, then the multitude of penal</del> <add>of our penal laws is an evil: but a much greater evil, & which is | ||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
much more likely to ensnare us, is their want<!-- symbol above letter w --> of precision in</add> | |||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
<del>" | <del>"laws would not only be looked upon as</del> <add><unclear>enouncing</unclear> them: <del><unclear>s</unclear></del> the want<!-- number 1 above letter w --> of proportion of fixing them: & the | ||
<lb/> | |||
want of publicity in promulging them. Let the Legislature</add> | |||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
<del>thing, if every such law were a <del>Subject</del></del> <add>publicity, & there will be nothing impolitic or wicked in | <del>"an impolitic, but would also be a very wicked</del> <add>measure the degree by the ends of punishment: let it explain | ||
<lb/> | |||
itself with precision: let it not notify <sic>it's</sic> will with sufficient</add> | |||
<lb/> | |||
<del>thing, if every such law were a <del>Subject</del></del> <add>publicity, & there will be nothing impolitic or wicked in | |||
<lb/> | |||
penal laws: no fear <add><gap/></add> of their multitudes honed ensnare</add> | |||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
<del>"snare for the conscience of the Subject".</del> <add>men's consciences.<lb/> <add><del>The mistake of our Author seems</del></add></add></p> | <del>"snare for the conscience of the Subject".</del> <add>men's consciences.<lb/> <add><del>The mistake of our Author seems</del></add></add></p> | ||
Line 18: | Line 26: | ||
<del>— He says, what I profess I do not understand.</del> <add><del>The Author seems to imagine, that the moral sanction has</del> <del>The n</del> The Author saw <del>th</del> or thought he saw some difference</add> | <del>— He says, what I profess I do not understand.</del> <add><del>The Author seems to imagine, that the moral sanction has</del> <del>The n</del> The Author saw <del>th</del> or thought he saw some difference</add> | ||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
<del>If the Legislature explains</del> <add>in what he calls the natural & municipal Law: this difference <add>lies</add> <del>was this, that his natural law had only the</del></add> | <del>If the Legislature explains</del> <add>in what he calls the natural & municipal Law: this | ||
<lb/> | |||
difference <add>lies</add> <del>was this, that his natural law had only the</del></add> | |||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
<del>itself with precision, and <sic>notifys</sic> <sic>it's</sic></del> <add><del>moral, & not the legal Sanction: he mistook</del> not in the <del><unclear>ir</unclear></del> directory but in sanctionary part: for the rule</add> | <del>itself with precision, and <sic>notifys</sic> <sic>it's</sic></del> <add><del>moral, & not the legal Sanction: he mistook</del> not in the <del><unclear>ir</unclear></del> directory but in sanctionary part: for the rule</add> | ||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
<del>will with sufficient publicity, I cannot</del> <add>of conduct for a good man & a good Citizen must be the same: the Characters are inseparable. Here was the</add> | <del>will with sufficient publicity, I cannot</del> <add>of conduct for a good man & a good Citizen must be the | ||
<lb/> | |||
same: the Characters are inseparable. Here was the</add> | |||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
<del>understand, how it can ensnare the</del> <add>Author's first mistake: Because the sanctions are different he supposed the end to be so too. He saw likewise or thought</add> | <del>understand, how it can ensnare the</del> <add>Author's first mistake: Because the sanctions are different | ||
<lb/> | |||
he supposed the end to be so too. He saw likewise or thought</add> | |||
<lb/> | |||
<del>conscience of the Subject. I do not mean</del> <add>he saw some difference in the sanctionary part & | |||
<lb/> | |||
the difference is, that his natural law has only the moral</add> | |||
<lb/> | |||
<del>to justify the multiplicity of our penal <add>Laws</add></del> <add>sanction, not the legal: here again he mistook: & because | |||
<lb/> | |||
municipal law has the legal sanction, concluded it could | |||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
not have the moral: & therefore supposing Conscience | |||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
to let know not what, & affected only the the moral <add>sanction</add></add> | |||
</p> | </p> | ||
<head>97</head> | <head>97</head> |
To be copied human laws to be binding upon mens multitude of penal laws I neither know: no doubt the multiplicity
Consciences, then the multitude of penal of our penal laws is an evil: but a much greater evil, & which is
much more likely to ensnare us, is their want of precision in
"laws would not only be looked upon as enouncing them: s the want of proportion of fixing them: & the
want of publicity in promulging them. Let the Legislature
"an impolitic, but would also be a very wicked measure the degree by the ends of punishment: let it explain
itself with precision: let it not notify it's will with sufficient
thing, if every such law were a Subject publicity, & there will be nothing impolitic or wicked in
penal laws: no fear <add> of their multitudes honed ensnare</add>
"snare for the conscience of the Subject". men's consciences.
<add>The mistake of our Author seems</add>
— He says, what I profess I do not understand. The Author seems to imagine, that the moral sanction has The n The Author saw th or thought he saw some difference
If the Legislature explains in what he calls the natural & municipal Law: this
difference <add>lies was this, that his natural law had only the</add>
itself with precision, and notifys it's moral, & not the legal Sanction: he mistook not in the ir directory but in sanctionary part: for the rule
will with sufficient publicity, I cannot of conduct for a good man & a good Citizen must be the
same: the Characters are inseparable. Here was the
understand, how it can ensnare the Author's first mistake: Because the sanctions are different
he supposed the end to be so too. He saw likewise or thought
conscience of the Subject. I do not mean he saw some difference in the sanctionary part &
the difference is, that his natural law has only the moral
to justify the multiplicity of our penal Laws sanction, not the legal: here again he mistook: & because
municipal law has the legal sanction, concluded it could
not have the moral: & therefore supposing Conscience
to let know not what, & affected only the the moral <add>sanction</add>
97
Identifier: | JB/096/036/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 96. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
096 |
comment on the commentaries |
||
036 |
|||
002 |
|||
collectanea |
4 |
||
recto |
c96 / c97 / c98 / c99 |
||
168 |
[[watermarks::gr [quartered royal arms motif]]] |
||
[[notes_public::"to be copied" [note not in bentham's hand]]] |
31040 |
||