JB/015/592/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/015/592/001: Difference between revisions

David (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


to <gap/>  him to the conversation. And the mis- <lb/> takes should be such as lead to annoy the annoy [he repeats himself without realizing it, I think]  is & <lb/> the annoyed. It is not in <gap/> to show that we have<lb/> been hurt by what may have been a want of <gap/> &#x2014;is<lb/> a want of liberably/liberality?, &#x2014; in the part of him who has been<lb/> imitated by the expression?/repression of opinions <gap/>&#x2014; it <lb/> is not <gap/> that you should give? pain to the speaker? <lb/> who in the introduction of a disagnable? <gap/> had <lb/> perhaps had undertaken to hurt the pihsy? of his neighbor &#x2014;<lb/> Chieth? not the conversation then by impervious reproof? &#x2014; her? win? <hi rend="superscript">by any instance? of</hi>  <foreign>animastrenium</foreign> &#x2014;  
<p>to give <gap/>  him to the conversation. And the mistake <lb/>  
the <foreign>animastrenium</foreign><lb/> will not be pertipath? with other means have been <lb/> tried &#x2014; If you can service? the conversation/convention? away to <lb/> pleasurable topics, by any other than harmful agencies? &#x2014;<lb/> <hi rend="underline">that</hi> is your duty.  
should be such as lead to annoy the annoy is &amp; <lb/>  
the annoyed. It is not necessary to show that we have<lb/>  
been hurt by what may have been a want of temper &#x2014;is<lb/>  
a want of liberality, &#x2014; in the part of him who has been<lb/> irritated by the repression of opinions he took to be his own &#x2014; it<lb/>  
is not necessary that you should give pain to the speaker  <lb/>  
who in the introduction of a disagreeable <gap/> had <lb/>  
perhaps no intention to hurt the feelings of his neighbor<lb/>
<gap/> not the conversation then by impervious reproof? &#x2014; <lb/>
nor win <add>by any instance? of</add>  <foreign>animadversium</foreign> &#x2014; the <foreign>animadversium</foreign><lb/>  
will not be <gap/> till other means have been <lb/>  
tried &#x2014; If you can service the conversation away to <lb/> pleasurable topics, by any other than harmful agencies? &#x2014;<lb/> <hi rend="underline">that</hi> is your duty.</p>
 
<p>And, as a necessary consequence of this<lb/>
the arts of benevolence cannot be better  exercised <del>than</del><lb/> in occasions where we are forced as it were into the <lb/>
company of others, than by the choice of pleasurable <lb/>
topics of conversation &#x2014; a little attention will discover<lb/> <del>what in</del> those topics. To detect what are the peculiar<lb/>
<gap/> of another man's mind, &#x2014; or experience &#x2014; or <lb/> knowledge &#x2014; is among the happiest of discoveries. <lb/>
Its  exercise is <gap/> complimentary to the other party<lb/> &amp; instructive to ourselves.</p>


And, as a recupary? consequence? of this<lb/> the arts of benevolence cannot be better  exercised <del>than</del><lb/> in occasions where we are pried?/forced as it were into the <lb/> company of others, than by the  <gap/> of pleasurable <lb/> topics of conversation/convention &#x2014; a little attention will discover<lb/> <del>what in</del> strove?  topics. To detect what an/in/ are the <gap/><lb/> of another man's mind, &#x2014; or experience &#x2014; or <lb/> knowledge &#x2014; is among the happiest of discoveries. <lb/> It's  exercise is <gap/>complimentary to the other party<lb/> & instructive to ourselves.




''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''





Revision as of 10:01, 18 February 2014

Click Here To Edit

to give him to the conversation. And the mistake
should be such as lead to annoy the annoy is &
the annoyed. It is not necessary to show that we have
been hurt by what may have been a want of temper —is
a want of liberality, — in the part of him who has been
irritated by the repression of opinions he took to be his own — it
is not necessary that you should give pain to the speaker
who in the introduction of a disagreeable had
perhaps no intention to hurt the feelings of his neighbor
not the conversation then by impervious reproof? —
nor win by any instance? of animadversium — the animadversium
will not be till other means have been
tried — If you can service the conversation away to
pleasurable topics, by any other than harmful agencies? —
that is your duty.

And, as a necessary consequence of this
the arts of benevolence cannot be better exercised than
in occasions where we are forced as it were into the
company of others, than by the choice of pleasurable
topics of conversation — a little attention will discover
what in those topics. To detect what are the peculiar
of another man's mind, — or experience — or
knowledge — is among the happiest of discoveries.
Its exercise is complimentary to the other party
& instructive to ourselves.





Identifier: | JB/015/592/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 15.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

015

Main Headings

deontology

Folio number

592

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

linking material

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f278

Penner

sir john bowring

Watermarks

hall

Marginals

Paper Producer

louis francois joseph le dieu

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

5807993

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in