★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''[{{fullurl:JB/096/002/003|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | '''[{{fullurl:JB/096/002/003|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<hi rend='underline'>To be<gap/></hi><lb/> unintelligible to a man of common<lb/>understanding.<lb/><p>Our Author seems to have been led into this inaccurate use of the term law by a servile<lb/> imitation of Montesquieu. Montesquieu<lb/> had said before him. "<foreign>Tous les etres | <hi rend='underline'>To be<gap/></hi><lb/> unintelligible to a man of common<lb/>understanding.<lb/><p>Our Author seems to have been led into this inaccurate use of the term law by a servile<lb/> imitation of Montesquieu. Montesquieu<lb/> had said before him. "<foreign>Tous les etres ont leurs<lb/>"lois, la divinite a ses loix, le monde <unclear><lb/>questionable reading</unclear>"riel a ses loix, les intelligences superieurs<lb/>"a l'homme ont leurs loix, les betes only leurs<lb/>"loix, l'homme a ses loix."</foreign> But then <note><foreign>Esprit des loix. livre prem: chap prem:</foreign></note>Montesquieu had given a different<del>diff</del><lb/>definition of law: he had said, "<foreign>les loix sont les</foreign><lb/>"rapports, qui derivent de la nature des choses."<lb/> and supposing this definition to be just,<lb/>supposing it not to have mistaken the <del>this</del> foundation of Law for Law itself, then<lb/>the</p> 13<lb/><pb/> | ||
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet'' | ''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet'' | ||
To be
unintelligible to a man of common
understanding.
Our Author seems to have been led into this inaccurate use of the term law by a servile
imitation of Montesquieu. Montesquieu
had said before him. "Tous les etres ont leurs
"lois, la divinite a ses loix, le monde
questionable reading"riel a ses loix, les intelligences superieurs
"a l'homme ont leurs loix, les betes only leurs
"loix, l'homme a ses loix." But then Esprit des loix. livre prem: chap prem:Montesquieu had given a differentdiff
definition of law: he had said, "les loix sont les
"rapports, qui derivent de la nature des choses."
and supposing this definition to be just,
supposing it not to have mistaken the this foundation of Law for Law itself, then
the
13
---page break---
This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet
|
Identifier: | JB/096/002/003"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 96. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
096 |
comment on the commentaries |
||
|
002 |
|||
|
003 |
|||
|
collectanea |
4 |
||
|
recto |
c11 f2 / c12 / c13 / c14 |
||
|
168 |
[[watermarks::gr [quartered royal arms motif]]] |
||
|
[[notes_public::"to be omitted" [note not in bentham's hand]]] |
31006 |
||
