JB/096/053/004: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/096/053/004: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
Diane Folan (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/096/053/004|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/096/053/004|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
 
<!-- horizontal line -->
<head>Sect. I. Law in General  12</head>
<!-- horizontal line -->
<p> <note>Unerring rules.</note> rules themselves unerring, rules that do not err, from <sic>somthing</sic> they
<lb/>
might be thought liable to err from; or rules unerred from.<unclear>?</unclear><!-- ? mark or speech marks? --> rules that
<lb/>
the creatures they are given to do not err from. rules that do not themselves
<lb/>
err from any thing, or rules that nothing errs from.<lb/></p>
<p>If the rules he means, are rules that do not err themselves, what it
<lb/>
is, supposing for argument sake they did err, what is it he imagines they would err from.<unclear>?</unclear>  If rules that the creatures do not err
<lb/>
from, whether he is absolutely sure that he could find or imagine
<lb/>
(for it would be too hard upon him to require him to produce, any
<lb/>
such rule.<unclear>?</unclear> or whether if he found by chance a creature erring from
<lb/>
one of these his rules, he would not make another rule to suit the
<lb/>
erring.<unclear>?</unclear> and whether he would not find out the same sort of rules
<lb/>
for creatures if there were any such, that have <hi rend='underline'>chance</hi> to govern
<lb/>
them.<lb/></p>
<p>These qustions, I say would need to be persued to an answer, we
<lb/>
we could say we understood our Author: they would need to be pursued
<lb/>
to an answer (<del>in order to our understanding</del> <add><unclear>we</unclear> we could understand</add> the subject, if understanding
<lb/>
 
<lb/></p>
 
 





Revision as of 22:37, 16 December 2010

Click Here To Edit


Sect. I. Law in General 12

Unerring rules. rules themselves unerring, rules that do not err, from somthing they
might be thought liable to err from; or rules unerred from.? rules that
the creatures they are given to do not err from. rules that do not themselves
err from any thing, or rules that nothing errs from.

If the rules he means, are rules that do not err themselves, what it
is, supposing for argument sake they did err, what is it he imagines they would err from.? If rules that the creatures do not err
from, whether he is absolutely sure that he could find or imagine
(for it would be too hard upon him to require him to produce, any
such rule.? or whether if he found by chance a creature erring from
one of these his rules, he would not make another rule to suit the
erring.? and whether he would not find out the same sort of rules
for creatures if there were any such, that have chance to govern
them.

These qustions, I say would need to be persued to an answer, we
we could say we understood our Author: they would need to be pursued
to an answer (in order to our understanding we we could understand the subject, if understanding





Identifier: | JB/096/053/004"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 96.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

not numbered

Box

096

Main Headings

comment on the commentaries

Folio number

053

Info in main headings field

sect. i law in general

Image

004

Titles

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f9 / f10 / f11 / f12

Penner

Watermarks

[[watermarks::gr [crown motif] [lion with crown motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

31057

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in