JB/096/054/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/096/054/002: Difference between revisions

Diane Folan (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Diane Folan (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/096/054/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/096/054/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
under construction ...




Line 10: Line 7:
I find it a vain thing to seek to guard myself against
I find it a vain thing to seek to guard myself against
<lb/>
<lb/>
the charge of misrepresentation: <del>for</del> <add><del><gap/></del> <add>I</add> consider a passage,</add> <del>if I <gap/></del>  
the charge of misrepresentation: <del>for</del> <add><del><gap/></del> <add>I</add> consider a passage,</add> <del>if I <unclear>grad</unclear></del>  
<lb/>
<lb/>
according to the best of my judgment I give it the
according to the best of my judgment I give it the
Line 32: Line 29:
that he should give us this account of them; and
that he should give us this account of them; and
<lb/>
<lb/>
surely <del>there is some appearance of Laws <gap/></del> <add><unclear><del>no</del></unclear> very good account as it <add>should</add> raised, we ought</add>
surely <del>there is some appearance of Laws <unclear>having</unclear></del> <add><unclear><del>no</del></unclear> very good account as it <add>should</add> raised, we ought</add>
<lb/>
<lb/>
<del><unclear>the sight</unclear> of it</del>, <add>to have of <del>them</del> the first two of them:</add> if as he assured us, no human
<del><unclear>the sight</unclear> of it</del>, <add>to have of <del>them</del> the first two of them:</add> if as he assured us, no human
Line 51: Line 48:
<p>[It was necessary we should have a good account of
<p>[It was necessary we should have a good account of
<lb/>
<lb/>
them: <del>it was also necessary</del> <add>that is, there could be no use for it</add>  The Will of  
them: <del>it was also unnecessary</del> <add>that is, there could be no use for it</add>  The Will of man's
<lb/>
maker is this Law of Nature: this will "is inevitably
<lb/>
conformed to, not in <del><unclear>a</unclear></del> <add><unclear>wide</unclear> <add><gap/> and there a</add></add> point as <del>you</del> <add>one</add>
<lb/>
might suppose, but in "all".  To be inevitably 
<lb/>
<lb/>
maker is this Law of Nature: this <gap/> is
conformed to it must be inevitably known.
 
<lb/></p>
 
</p>




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 12:01, 22 December 2010

Click Here To Edit


tas task as that of settling it between them. making them friends again..
I find it a vain thing to seek to guard myself against
the charge of misrepresentation: for <add>I consider a passage,</add> if I grad
according to the best of my judgment I give it the
sense that's due to it. If that sense be absurd: he
may say it is not this: and whatever be that sense
if it be a sense, he may always say it is not
this.

[The Law of Nature. And the Law of Revelation.
and the Law of Nature.

It was "necessary", + + p.44 our Auther, is of opinion,
that he should give us this account of them; and
surely there is some appearance of Laws having no very good account as it <add>should raised, we ought</add>
the sight of it, to have of them the first two of them: if as he assured us, no human
Laws are to be suffer'd to contradict these them".
If in short we care if were any human Laws to "in joining" or
even "allowing" us to do any thing forbidden by either
of them, we are bound to transgress that human
Law: supposing always, which is impossible
that a Law which does nothing but as more than to allow
can be transgressed.

[It was necessary we should have a good account of
them: it was also unnecessary that is, there could be no use for it The Will of man's
maker is this Law of Nature: this will "is inevitably
conformed to, not in a wide <add> and there a</add> point as you one
might suppose, but in "all". To be inevitably
conformed to it must be inevitably known.



Identifier: | JB/096/054/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 96.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

096

Main Headings

comment on the commentaries

Folio number

054

Info in main headings field

sect. ii law of nature

Image

002

Titles

note

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f1 / / /

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[motif] [lion with crown motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

31058

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in