JB/073/014/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/073/014/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
Diane Folan (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/073/014/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/073/014/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>1</head>
<head>MALICIOUS MISCHIEF</head>
<head>to APHORISM 1"</head>
<p><sic>Im</sic> assessing the Punishment
<lb/></p>
<p>The Consequential mischief, when it appears
<lb/>
to have been in contemplation, <del>may</del> <add>shall</add> be added
<lb/>
to the Direct: <note>This <gap/> Brackets need not be inserted in the General Substantive Code. of</note> [of which, upon the completion
<lb/>
of the case, <del><gap/></del> whose has <gap/> of the
<lb/>
fact, without any special evidence, may
<lb/>
judge.]<lb/></p>
<p>Reason &#x2014; This must be done, because according
<lb/>
to the Rules of Punishment, no greater
<lb/>
is to be impoed than what is necessary <add>sufficient</add> for <del>the</del>
<lb/>
prevention of <add><sic>delivring</sic> from</add> of the mischief: now wht is sufficient
<lb/>
for <del>the prevention</del> <add><sic>delivring</sic></add> from a loss is <del>not</del>
<lb/>
sufficient for a greater: <del>therefore because</del> to
<lb/>
are who has a thing appetite to work mischief
<lb/>
the <del>so</del> doing of a little is <add><gap/></add> is not so high a gratification
<lb/>
as the doing of a greater:  the <gap/>
<lb/>
therefore in this latter case will be <del>the</del> greater: the
<lb/>
Punishment <add>antagonistic</add> opposed to that propensity ought
<lb/>
therefore to be <del>the grea</del> <add>in the same proportion</add> greater.
<lb/></p>
 
<pb/>
 
<head>2</head>





Revision as of 18:28, 22 December 2010

Click Here To Edit

1 MALICIOUS MISCHIEF to APHORISM 1"

Im assessing the Punishment

The Consequential mischief, when it appears
to have been in contemplation, may shall be added
to the Direct: This Brackets need not be inserted in the General Substantive Code. of [of which, upon the completion
of the case, whose has of the
fact, without any special evidence, may
judge.]

Reason — This must be done, because according
to the Rules of Punishment, no greater
is to be impoed than what is necessary sufficient for the
prevention of delivring from of the mischief: now wht is sufficient
for the prevention delivring from a loss is not
sufficient for a greater: therefore because to
are who has a thing appetite to work mischief
the so doing of a little is is not so high a gratification
as the doing of a greater: the
therefore in this latter case will be the greater: the
Punishment antagonistic opposed to that propensity ought
therefore to be the grea in the same proportion greater.


---page break---

2




Identifier: | JB/073/014/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 73.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

073

Main Headings

law in general

Folio number

014

Info in main headings field

malicious mischief

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f1 / f2

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::gr c[crown motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

23854

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in