JB/119/013/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/119/013/001: Difference between revisions

David (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
David (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 7: Line 7:
<head>Supplemental hints and observations</head><lb/>
<head>Supplemental hints and observations</head><lb/>


proposed expedients, to distinguish between <sic>removeable</sic><lb/>
<p>proposed expedients, to distinguish between <sic>removeable</sic><lb/>
difficulties and radical objections:
difficulties and radical objections:</p>
 
<note>1 Liable to be exaggerated on both sides
2. <unclear>Familiarizing <gap/></unclear> crimes
3. <unclear>Corruption/Compliance of familiars/families.</unclear></note>
 
(Add full cross out here later)
FIX ALL MISTAKES AT NEXT SITTING.
 
 
 
I thought so as well to introduced the<lb/>
mention of the mode plan of punishment in question on<lb/>
the personal occasion as it bears so close on ontology<lb/> to the punishment <add>proposed to be</add> established in the labor-houses<lb/>and is so proposed to be so ordered if at all<lb/> as to depend upon that establishment for its execution.<lb/> It may perhaps at some future time be a proper<lb/>subject for excitement: the only <del><gap/></del> point that seems<lb/>clear at present is that it is not fit to be admitted<lb/>as an <del><gap/></del>original punishment of itself but only as<lb/> an <del>occasiona</del>l indulgence to be substitued isntead occasionally<lb/>to the other.
 
 
 
 
 
 





Revision as of 05:03, 20 February 2014

Click Here To Edit

81

Supplemental hints and observations

proposed expedients, to distinguish between removeable
difficulties and radical objections:

1 Liable to be exaggerated on both sides 2. Familiarizing crimes 3. Corruption/Compliance of familiars/families.

(Add full cross out here later) FIX ALL MISTAKES AT NEXT SITTING.


I thought so as well to introduced the
mention of the mode plan of punishment in question on
the personal occasion as it bears so close on ontology
to the punishment proposed to be established in the labor-houses
and is so proposed to be so ordered if at all
as to depend upon that establishment for its execution.
It may perhaps at some future time be a proper
subject for excitement: the only point that seems
clear at present is that it is not fit to be admitted
as an original punishment of itself but only as
an occasional indulgence to be substitued isntead occasionally
to the other.





This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet




Identifier: | JB/119/013/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 119.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

119

Main Headings

panopticon

Folio number

013

Info in main headings field

supplemental hints and observations

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f81

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::l v g propatria [britannia motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

caroline vernon

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

39524

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in