JB/119/013/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/119/013/001: Difference between revisions

David (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
David (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 11: Line 11:


<note>1 Liable to be exaggerated on both sides
<note>1 Liable to be exaggerated on both sides
2. <unclear>Familiarizing <gap/></unclear> crimes
2. <unclear>Familiarizing with</unclear> <del><unclear>of</unclear></del> crimes
3. <unclear>Corruption/Compliance of familiars/families.</unclear></note>
3. <unclear>Corruption/<unclear>Compliance of familiars/families.</unclear></note>


(Add full cross out here later)
FIX ALL MISTAKES AT NEXT SITTING.




<p><del><gap/></del></p>


I thought so as well to introduced the<lb/>
 
mention of the mode plan of punishment in question on<lb/>
<p>I thought so as well to introduced the<lb/>
the personal occasion as it bears so close on ontology<lb/> to the punishment <add>proposed to be</add> established in the labor-houses<lb/>and is so proposed to be so ordered if at all<lb/> as to depend upon that establishment for its execution.<lb/> It may perhaps at some future time be a proper<lb/>subject for excitement: the only <del><gap/></del> point that seems<lb/>clear at present is that it is not fit to be admitted<lb/>as an <del><gap/></del>original punishment of itself but only as<lb/> an <del>occasiona</del>l indulgence to be substitued isntead occasionally<lb/>to the other.
mention of the <del>mode</del> <add>plan</add> of punishment in question on<lb/>
the present occasion as it bears so close an analogy<lb/>
to the punishment <add>proposed to be</add> established in the labour-<lb/>
houses and is <del>so</del> proposed to be so <sic>order'd</sic> if at all<lb/>
as to depend upon that establishment for <sic>it's</sic> execution.<lb/>
It may perhaps at some future time be a proper<lb/>
subject for experiment: this only <del><unclear>the</unclear></del> point that seems<lb/>
clear at present is that it is not fit to be admitted<lb/>
as an <del>independent</del><add>original</add> punishment of itself but only as<lb/>
an <del>occasional</del>l indulgence to be substituted <del>instead</del> occasionally<lb/>
to the other.</p>





Revision as of 13:38, 20 February 2014

Click Here To Edit

81

Supplemental hints and observations

proposed expedients, to distinguish between removeable
difficulties and radical objections:

1 Liable to be exaggerated on both sides 2. Familiarizing with of crimes 3. Corruption/<unclear>Compliance of familiars/families.



I thought so as well to introduced the
mention of the mode plan of punishment in question on
the present occasion as it bears so close an analogy
to the punishment proposed to be established in the labour-
houses and is so proposed to be so order'd if at all
as to depend upon that establishment for it's execution.
It may perhaps at some future time be a proper
subject for experiment: this only the point that seems
clear at present is that it is not fit to be admitted
as an independentoriginal punishment of itself but only as
an occasionall indulgence to be substituted instead occasionally
to the other.





This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet




Identifier: | JB/119/013/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 119.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

119

Main Headings

panopticon

Folio number

013

Info in main headings field

supplemental hints and observations

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f81

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::l v g propatria [britannia motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

caroline vernon

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

39524

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in