★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
<head>Supplemental hints and observations</head> | <head>Supplemental hints and observations</head> | ||
<p>be seen by all who had any intercourse with that<lb/> master: and if the <del>stigma were super</del> expedient of stigmatizing were superadded<lb/><del> | <p>be seen by all who had any intercourse with that<lb/> master: and if the <del>stigma were super</del> <add>expedient of stigmatizing</add> were superadded<lb/><del>be able</del> occasionally by all <del>his town's folks</del> the neighbourhood.</p> | ||
<p>3. In point of <hi rend="underline">disabling</hi> the convict from doing<lb/>further mischief, <add> | <p>3. In point of <hi rend="underline">disabling</hi> the convict from doing<lb/>further mischief, <add>private</add> <del>it</del> would <del>not</del> <add>hardly</add> in an equal degree<lb/>answer the purpose of public servitude. This however<lb/> is <del>hardly</del><add>scarcely</add> to be <sic>consider'd</sic> as an objection to it:<lb/>since <del>in cases where there appeared</del> <add>upon the supposition of there being</add> any reasonable<lb/>ground of apprehending <del>that</del> the continuance of the<lb/>mischievous propensity, it would not be adopted. Whether<lb/>it be safe <add>or no</add>to let a man out upon these terms<lb/>the Committee are to judge. If <add>it be</add> not, the presumption<lb/>must be that <add>they</add> will not let him out. <del>It is</del>It <del><gap/></del> is a<lb/> <unclear>life</unclear> power to trust them with than that of recommending<lb/> for a pardon.</p> | ||
<p>4. Neither is it in an equal degree calculated<lb/>to answer the purpose of <hi rend="underline">reformation</hi>. But <del><unclear>to</unclear></del><lb/><del>this objection there is the same answer as to the<lb/>preceding,</del> by the supposition the convict does not<lb/>stand so much in need of <del>it</del> being reformed.</p> | <p>4. Neither is it in an equal degree calculated<lb/>to answer the purpose of <hi rend="underline">reformation</hi>. But <del><unclear>to</unclear></del><lb/><del>this objection there is the same answer as to the<lb/>preceding,</del> by the supposition the convict does not<lb/>stand so much in need of <del>it</del> being reformed.</p> | ||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
5. It is not so <gap/></del> <add><del>divisible managable</del></add> ; I mean<lb/>so susceptible of being increased or diminished at<lb/>pleasure as the other. In point of duration indeed<lb/>it is: in point of intensity however it is not. This<lb/>will depend <add>in a good measure</add> upon the temper of the master; and cannot<lb/>as in the labour-houses be modified by settled<lb/> rules.</p> | 5. It is not so <gap/></del> <add><del>divisible managable</del></add> ; I mean<lb/>so susceptible of being increased or diminished at<lb/>pleasure as the other. In point of duration indeed<lb/>it is: in point of intensity however it is not. This<lb/>will depend <add>in a good measure</add> upon the temper of the master; and cannot<lb/>as in the labour-houses be modified by settled<lb/> rules.</p> | ||
6. Neither does it stand <del><gap/></del> upon a footing altogether<lb/>so advantageous in point of <hi rend="underline"> | <p>6. Neither does it stand <del><gap/></del> upon a footing altogether<lb/>so advantageous in point of <hi rend="underline">remissibility</hi>. A man <add>convict</add> <del>indeed</del> <add>who</add></p> | ||
79
Supplemental hints and observations
be seen by all who had any intercourse with that
master: and if the stigma were super expedient of stigmatizing were superadded
be able occasionally by all his town's folks the neighbourhood.
3. In point of disabling the convict from doing
further mischief, private it would not hardly in an equal degree
answer the purpose of public servitude. This however
is hardlyscarcely to be consider'd as an objection to it:
since in cases where there appeared upon the supposition of there being any reasonable
ground of apprehending that the continuance of the
mischievous propensity, it would not be adopted. Whether
it be safe or noto let a man out upon these terms
the Committee are to judge. If it be not, the presumption
must be that they will not let him out. It isIt is a
life power to trust them with than that of recommending
for a pardon.
4. Neither is it in an equal degree calculated
to answer the purpose of reformation. But to
this objection there is the same answer as to the
preceding, by the supposition the convict does not
stand so much in need of it being reformed.
5. It is not so divisible managable ; I mean
so susceptible of being increased or diminished at
pleasure as the other. In point of duration indeed
it is: in point of intensity however it is not. This
will depend in a good measure upon the temper of the master; and cannot
as in the labour-houses be modified by settled
rules.
6. Neither does it stand upon a footing altogether
so advantageous in point of remissibility. A man convict indeed who
|
Identifier: | JB/119/012/003"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 119. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
119 |
panopticon |
||
|
012 |
supplemental hints and observations a view of the hard-labour bill |
||
|
003 |
|||
|
text sheet |
4 |
||
|
recto |
f77 / f78 / f79 / f80 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::l v g propatria [britannia motif]]] |
||
|
caroline vernon |
|||
|
39523 |
|||
