JB/117/043/004: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/117/043/004: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
Petergh (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p><note>12</note><lb/>
though the plan itself should not have the honour of his<lb/>
approbation, especially as I understand it has already<lb/>
that of M<hi rend="superscript">r.</hi> Hobart's. And independently of the Penitentiary<lb/>
business, which is the only new concern, would<lb/>
not those others which I suppose have already obtained his<lb/>
sanction, the House of - Industry business I mean and the<lb/>
Model which is the thing that presses.</p>
 
<p>If you think proper to make use of the margin of this<lb/>
paper for your answer it may save you trouble. I will<lb/>
not tax your politeness for circumlocutory expressions.<lb/>
Single words such as approved or disapproved &amp;c, defining<lb/>
by brackets or otherwise the extent of the matter to which<lb/>
such an answer is meant to comprise, will answer every purpose<lb/>
and a Copy of it in that state shall be returned to you.</p>
 
<p>I must defer to another day what concerns the question<lb/>
between an Irish &amp; an English Architect, as likewise a few other<lb/>
matters. But of these there is nothing that need detain you in<lb/>
London.</p>
 
<p>In my letter of yesterday <hi rend="superscript">‖</hi> I gave you reason to expect this<lb/>
in the course of the present day. On second thoughts I thought it<lb/>
better to defer the sending of it till early tomorrow morning<lb/>
as by that means my messenger may if you think proper bring<lb/>
me back an Answer which by the post I could not have before<lb/>
Tuesday, and I found by him there were no signs of your departure<lb/>
as to day <hi rend="superscript">‡</hi> &#x2014; I have the honour to be<lb/>
with the truest respect<lb/>
Sir, Your most obed:<hi rend="superscript">t</hi> humble Serv.<hi rend="superscript">t</hi><lb/>
Jeremy Bentham<lb/>
R:<hi rend="superscript">t</hi> Hon: S:<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> John Parnell,<lb/>
&amp;c, &amp;c, &amp;c &#x2014;</p>
 
<p><hi rend="superscript">‖</hi> Only for the purpose of announcing this.<lb/>
<hi rend="superscript">‡</hi> This was a mistake, S:<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Jon was already gone</p>





Revision as of 12:05, 10 March 2014

Click Here To Edit

12
though the plan itself should not have the honour of his
approbation, especially as I understand it has already
that of Mr. Hobart's. And independently of the Penitentiary
business, which is the only new concern, would
not those others which I suppose have already obtained his
sanction, the House of - Industry business I mean and the
Model which is the thing that presses.

If you think proper to make use of the margin of this
paper for your answer it may save you trouble. I will
not tax your politeness for circumlocutory expressions.
Single words such as approved or disapproved &c, defining
by brackets or otherwise the extent of the matter to which
such an answer is meant to comprise, will answer every purpose
and a Copy of it in that state shall be returned to you.

I must defer to another day what concerns the question
between an Irish & an English Architect, as likewise a few other
matters. But of these there is nothing that need detain you in
London.

In my letter of yesterday I gave you reason to expect this
in the course of the present day. On second thoughts I thought it
better to defer the sending of it till early tomorrow morning
as by that means my messenger may if you think proper bring
me back an Answer which by the post I could not have before
Tuesday, and I found by him there were no signs of your departure
as to day — I have the honour to be
with the truest respect
Sir, Your most obed:t humble Serv.t
Jeremy Bentham
R:t Hon: S:r John Parnell,
&c, &c, &c —

Only for the purpose of announcing this.
This was a mistake, S:r Jon was already gone




Identifier: | JB/117/043/004"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 117.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

117

Main Headings

panopticon

Folio number

043

Info in main headings field

Image

004

Titles

Category

correspondence

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f9 / f10 / f11 / f12

Penner

Watermarks

[[watermarks::edmeads & pine [britannia with shield emblem]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

edward cooke

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

letter 711, vol. 4

ID Number

38660

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in